by Ascotexgunner » 29 Jun 2023 17:03
by Hendo » 29 Jun 2023 17:04
by Brogue » 29 Jun 2023 17:15
by Loafer » 29 Jun 2023 17:23
by Ascotexgunner » 29 Jun 2023 17:28
Hendo Ah yes, another new thread - just what was required.
by Royal_jimmy » 29 Jun 2023 17:38
by Elm Park Kid » 29 Jun 2023 18:40
by Royal_jimmy » 29 Jun 2023 20:30
by katweslowski » 29 Jun 2023 22:19
Royal_jimmy I bet we haven't submitted anything in response
by Sutekh » 30 Jun 2023 07:23
katweslowskiRoyal_jimmy I bet we haven't submitted anything in response
If that's the case then I'll look forward to the mass hysterical tweeting for days on end, each one fuelling the next one.
by Forbury Lion » 30 Jun 2023 10:56
If the person responsible for submitting it is the same person who sorts out the wages then they might get 40% of the response on time with the rest submitted at a later dateRoyal_jimmy I bet we haven't submitted anything in response
by ILoveMoonPig » 30 Jun 2023 11:59
by On Strings » 30 Jun 2023 12:05
Andy Bernal Does anyone know if they have bushes or hedges down at the efl headquarters?
by Stranded » 30 Jun 2023 12:14
by Silver Fox » 30 Jun 2023 14:20
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Jun 2023 14:40
Silver Fox Surely the main defence is that the punishment should be made in a timely manner and giving us a points deduction for something that was widely known about last season now is unjust
by Mid Sussex Royal » 30 Jun 2023 15:39
Snowflake RoyalSilver Fox Surely the main defence is that the punishment should be made in a timely manner and giving us a points deduction for something that was widely known about last season now is unjust
Don't think that will wash seeing as I think it's the third instance, which was recent, which has triggered the action.
by SCIAG » 30 Jun 2023 17:06
Royal_jimmy I bet we haven't submitted anything in response
by tidus_mi2 » 30 Jun 2023 17:09
SCIAGRoyal_jimmy I bet we haven't submitted anything in response
I understand we have submitted a response written on the back of a napkin. It is just the word “guilty”, but spelled wrong.
by RoyalBlue » 30 Jun 2023 17:17
Snowflake RoyalSilver Fox Surely the main defence is that the punishment should be made in a timely manner and giving us a points deduction for something that was widely known about last season now is unjust
Don't think that will wash seeing as I think it's the third instance, which was recent, which has triggered the action.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 257 guests