TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

3412 posts
WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5639
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 14 Dec 2023 15:01

genome Administration probably

But it's not logical. Who in their right mind would reject a bid, put us into administration, lose control of the sale process and in all likelihood receive a lot less?

If none of the bids are up to his asking price, the only logical response would be to fund the club again, get it on firmer footing and then be in a stronger negotiating position. But we know that won't happen.

The worry is that he's just given up on a sale, and we continue the current way for years. Late HMRC payments, payday uncertainty, players leaving on frees. Who knows where that would end.

blythspartan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2261
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 20:50

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by blythspartan » 14 Dec 2023 15:12

WestYorksRoyal
genome Administration probably

But it's not logical. Who in their right mind would reject a bid, put us into administration, lose control of the sale process and in all likelihood receive a lot less?

If none of the bids are up to his asking price, the only logical response would be to fund the club again, get it on firmer footing and then be in a stronger negotiating position. But we know that won't happen.

The worry is that he's just given up on a sale, and we continue the current way for years. Late HMRC payments, payday uncertainty, players leaving on frees. Who knows where that would end.


Sadly, I think it’ll end in liquidation.

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 19700
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Stranded » 14 Dec 2023 15:14

If it is true, not sure how anyone gets enticed to the table esp if it is clear that the negotiating partner is likely to shift the goalposts as you move close to a deal.

Feels like we may be a tiny bit more fcuked. But naturally not all clear this is true.

User avatar
genome
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25261
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 13:29
Location: Universe

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by genome » 14 Dec 2023 15:16

WestYorksRoyal
genome Administration probably

But it's not logical. Who in their right mind would reject a bid, put us into administration, lose control of the sale process and in all likelihood receive a lot less?

If none of the bids are up to his asking price, the only logical response would be to fund the club again, get it on firmer footing and then be in a stronger negotiating position. But we know that won't happen.

The worry is that he's just given up on a sale, and we continue the current way for years. Late HMRC payments, payday uncertainty, players leaving on frees. Who knows where that would end.


a slow death

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5639
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 14 Dec 2023 15:16

blythspartan
WestYorksRoyal
genome Administration probably

But it's not logical. Who in their right mind would reject a bid, put us into administration, lose control of the sale process and in all likelihood receive a lot less?

If none of the bids are up to his asking price, the only logical response would be to fund the club again, get it on firmer footing and then be in a stronger negotiating position. But we know that won't happen.

The worry is that he's just given up on a sale, and we continue the current way for years. Late HMRC payments, payday uncertainty, players leaving on frees. Who knows where that would end.


Sadly, I think it’ll end in liquidation.

Again, why? Let's reject £30m and then let the club be liquidated so I get fcuk all.

The most likely explanation is he likes the gaming mindset, and he'd rather liquidation rather than "lose" in negotiations. But even then, he and many others lose out big time in a liquidation scenario.


blythspartan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2261
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 20:50

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by blythspartan » 14 Dec 2023 15:29

WestYorksRoyal
blythspartan
WestYorksRoyal But it's not logical. Who in their right mind would reject a bid, put us into administration, lose control of the sale process and in all likelihood receive a lot less?

If none of the bids are up to his asking price, the only logical response would be to fund the club again, get it on firmer footing and then be in a stronger negotiating position. But we know that won't happen.

The worry is that he's just given up on a sale, and we continue the current way for years. Late HMRC payments, payday uncertainty, players leaving on frees. Who knows where that would end.


Sadly, I think it’ll end in liquidation.

Again, why? Let's reject £30m and then let the club be liquidated so I get fcuk all.

The most likely explanation is he likes the gaming mindset, and he'd rather liquidation rather than "lose" in negotiations. But even then, he and many others lose out big time in a liquidation scenario.


He’s done it to two other clubs and I could see him just writing off his losses. As much as that doesn’t make sense he’s not a rational man. I’d also imagine the demonstrations have hurt his pride/feelings and I could see him doing it out of pure spite. Obviously, I hope I am wrong, but I don’t see a happy ending.

El Diablo
Member
Posts: 244
Joined: 03 Oct 2012 13:20

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by El Diablo » 14 Dec 2023 16:13

blythspartan
WestYorksRoyal
blythspartan
Sadly, I think it’ll end in liquidation.

Again, why? Let's reject £30m and then let the club be liquidated so I get fcuk all.

The most likely explanation is he likes the gaming mindset, and he'd rather liquidation rather than "lose" in negotiations. But even then, he and many others lose out big time in a liquidation scenario.


He’s done it to two other clubs and I could see him just writing off his losses. As much as that doesn’t make sense he’s not a rational man. I’d also imagine the demonstrations have hurt his pride/feelings and I could see him doing it out of pure spite. Obviously, I hope I am wrong, but I don’t see a happy ending.


I work with clients who are extremely rich, and live in a world where rational thinking as we'd see it is totally devoid. For Dai, its not about the money. Its about the deal. If he doesn't get the deal he wants, he'll just shrug his shoulders and move on. £30m to him is nothing. It has no impact on his life or his lifestyle.
And we all know that he doesn't give a shit about the club , the town or its fans.
I fear the worse.

User avatar
rabidbee
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3006
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 17:51
Location: Like a dog to vomit

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by rabidbee » 14 Dec 2023 16:26

The reality is that none of us really know anything concrete, and the vacuum is being filled by rumour, misinformation and conjecture.

Mid Sussex Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3289
Joined: 02 Nov 2008 17:56

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Mid Sussex Royal » 14 Dec 2023 16:26

blythspartan
WestYorksRoyal
blythspartan
Sadly, I think it’ll end in liquidation.

Again, why? Let's reject £30m and then let the club be liquidated so I get fcuk all.

The most likely explanation is he likes the gaming mindset, and he'd rather liquidation rather than "lose" in negotiations. But even then, he and many others lose out big time in a liquidation scenario.


He’s done it to two other clubs and I could see him just writing off his losses. As much as that doesn’t make sense he’s not a rational man. I’d also imagine the demonstrations have hurt his pride/feelings and I could see him doing it out of pure spite. Obviously, I hope I am wrong, but I don’t see a happy ending.


Agree with this, the culture in China/SE Asia is different to here....its similar to Chansiri at Sheffield


WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5639
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 14 Dec 2023 16:28

Mid Sussex Royal
blythspartan
WestYorksRoyal Again, why? Let's reject £30m and then let the club be liquidated so I get fcuk all.

The most likely explanation is he likes the gaming mindset, and he'd rather liquidation rather than "lose" in negotiations. But even then, he and many others lose out big time in a liquidation scenario.


He’s done it to two other clubs and I could see him just writing off his losses. As much as that doesn’t make sense he’s not a rational man. I’d also imagine the demonstrations have hurt his pride/feelings and I could see him doing it out of pure spite. Obviously, I hope I am wrong, but I don’t see a happy ending.


Agree with this, the culture in China/SE Asia is different to here....its similar to Chansiri at Sheffield

Everyone talks about the culture, saving face, not being shamed etc.,. This is a man who has acted with no shame. He clearly doesn't give a shit about his reputation, and if he does he should pay his staff.

User avatar
Franchise FC
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11034
Joined: 22 May 2007 16:24
Location: Relocated to LA

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Franchise FC » 14 Dec 2023 16:31

Greatwesternline
WestYorksRoyal Anybody else starting to get seriously concerned that Dai's not going this season?


If there are 4 parties interested in buying Reading, there will be 4 sets of du diligence, 4 sets of negotiations.

The owner will be playing these offers against one another, its an auction of sorts.

Depending on who the winner is, it could be a number of weeks until they meet the Fit n Propa test, due to the number of parties involved and their source of funds, especially if they live abroad.

I would expect were a deal to be done before Xmas that if its a foreign consortium we might see fit n propa passed by late Feb?

If it was Mike Ashley for real, it might be quicker, given his source of wealth is very public and very well known.

Tbh i dont think Mike Ashley would see us as a venture he'd be interested in, he's more interest in buying assets with no other buyers interested, and picking them up for close to zero so that there is almost no down side risk. If he's having to compete with 3 other buyers he isn't getting it for next to nothing and it represents significant risk.

I've never been involved in any deal where due diligence was performed BEFORE becoming the preferred bidder
DD is extremely expensive and to do it 'on spec' is ridiculously unlikely
Besides, it would mean opening up the books for more than one entity at a time. More likely now than it used to be because of the use of technology but still pretty unlikely

Maybe some of the other Nobbers that remain in the industry can update my experience if this isn't the case

Greatwesternline
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6335
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 14:36

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Greatwesternline » 14 Dec 2023 16:40

Franchise FC
Greatwesternline
WestYorksRoyal Anybody else starting to get seriously concerned that Dai's not going this season?


If there are 4 parties interested in buying Reading, there will be 4 sets of du diligence, 4 sets of negotiations.

The owner will be playing these offers against one another, its an auction of sorts.

Depending on who the winner is, it could be a number of weeks until they meet the Fit n Propa test, due to the number of parties involved and their source of funds, especially if they live abroad.

I would expect were a deal to be done before Xmas that if its a foreign consortium we might see fit n propa passed by late Feb?

If it was Mike Ashley for real, it might be quicker, given his source of wealth is very public and very well known.

Tbh i dont think Mike Ashley would see us as a venture he'd be interested in, he's more interest in buying assets with no other buyers interested, and picking them up for close to zero so that there is almost no down side risk. If he's having to compete with 3 other buyers he isn't getting it for next to nothing and it represents significant risk.

I've never been involved in any deal where due diligence was performed BEFORE becoming the preferred bidder
DD is extremely expensive and to do it 'on spec' is ridiculously unlikely
Besides, it would mean opening up the books for more than one entity at a time. More likely now than it used to be because of the use of technology but still pretty unlikely

Maybe some of the other Nobbers that remain in the industry can update my experience if this isn't the case


Yeh i got carried aware when adding up all the delays. But i do think Dai is in no rush and would be happy to let as many people as possible take as long as possible to make bids, to drum up demand.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5639
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 14 Dec 2023 16:44

Seeing some real hatred for Howe online, with nobody really specifying why. This is a man who was CEO over our most successful era, and a time when the club had values we were proud of. I'd be very surprised if he is trying to screw us over. And if he is bringing less than ideal candidates to the table, perhaps he has reasonably concluded that none would be worse than Dai staying?


User avatar
morganb
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2449
Joined: 31 Jul 2017 12:30

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by morganb » 14 Dec 2023 16:54

I wonder if, deep down, Dai still 'enjoys' owning Reading and doesn't want to let us go. Perhaps a part of him hopes he will soon be able to get his riches out of China and everything will be fine again. As people have said it doesn't look to be all about the money if he is willing to gamble on administration rather than take an inferior offer.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5639
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 14 Dec 2023 17:08

Franchise FC
Greatwesternline
WestYorksRoyal Anybody else starting to get seriously concerned that Dai's not going this season?


If there are 4 parties interested in buying Reading, there will be 4 sets of du diligence, 4 sets of negotiations.

The owner will be playing these offers against one another, its an auction of sorts.

Depending on who the winner is, it could be a number of weeks until they meet the Fit n Propa test, due to the number of parties involved and their source of funds, especially if they live abroad.

I would expect were a deal to be done before Xmas that if its a foreign consortium we might see fit n propa passed by late Feb?

If it was Mike Ashley for real, it might be quicker, given his source of wealth is very public and very well known.

Tbh i dont think Mike Ashley would see us as a venture he'd be interested in, he's more interest in buying assets with no other buyers interested, and picking them up for close to zero so that there is almost no down side risk. If he's having to compete with 3 other buyers he isn't getting it for next to nothing and it represents significant risk.

I've never been involved in any deal where due diligence was performed BEFORE becoming the preferred bidder
DD is extremely expensive and to do it 'on spec' is ridiculously unlikely
Besides, it would mean opening up the books for more than one entity at a time. More likely now than it used to be because of the use of technology but still pretty unlikely

Maybe some of the other Nobbers that remain in the industry can update my experience if this isn't the case

Agree entirely. You ask initial questions up front and try to identify red flags. But full blown DD involves a shed load of money to legal and accountancy firms. You would never go down that route without exclusivity.

User avatar
tmesis
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2796
Joined: 16 Aug 2013 20:26

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by tmesis » 14 Dec 2023 17:12

WestYorksRoyal
blythspartan
WestYorksRoyal But it's not logical. Who in their right mind would reject a bid, put us into administration, lose control of the sale process and in all likelihood receive a lot less?

If none of the bids are up to his asking price, the only logical response would be to fund the club again, get it on firmer footing and then be in a stronger negotiating position. But we know that won't happen.

The worry is that he's just given up on a sale, and we continue the current way for years. Late HMRC payments, payday uncertainty, players leaving on frees. Who knows where that would end.


Sadly, I think it’ll end in liquidation.

Again, why? Let's reject £30m and then let the club be liquidated so I get fcuk all.

The most likely explanation is he likes the gaming mindset, and he'd rather liquidation rather than "lose" in negotiations. But even then, he and many others lose out big time in a liquidation scenario.

It depends how much he's being offered.

If it's less than he thinks he can get for selling the stadium and training ground (+ any other assets?) he probably wouldn't take it.

User avatar
maffff
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5458
Joined: 25 Nov 2010 09:22

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by maffff » 14 Dec 2023 17:20

WestYorksRoyal Seeing some real hatred for Howe online, with nobody really specifying why. This is a man who was CEO over our most successful era, and a time when the club had values we were proud of. I'd be very surprised if he is trying to screw us over. And if he is bringing less than ideal candidates to the table, perhaps he has reasonably concluded that none would be worse than Dai staying?


All will come out in the wash.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39955
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 14 Dec 2023 21:34

Sutekh The club itself made a statement to confirm what was happening therefore I would expect the club to do the same with any significant changes to their statement but this is Reading and they just can't be arsed to speak to the hoi poloi. MB won't even speak to Tim despite numerous requests for a chat (in essence MB just responds with "what am I meant to say about it all"). God I hate club's that think communication vacuums are a good idea.


He's spot on tbf.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39955
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 14 Dec 2023 21:37

genome
WestYorksRoyal
genome Administration probably

But it's not logical. Who in their right mind would reject a bid, put us into administration, lose control of the sale process and in all likelihood receive a lot less?

If none of the bids are up to his asking price, the only logical response would be to fund the club again, get it on firmer footing and then be in a stronger negotiating position. But we know that won't happen.

The worry is that he's just given up on a sale, and we continue the current way for years. Late HMRC payments, payday uncertainty, players leaving on frees. Who knows where that would end.


a slow death

No way it carries on for years. He's already got the sponsors paying wages. It's deal or liquidation.

He's also not going to refuse a deal only to put us in Adminstration and have the Administrators accept a worse deal he gets a smaller share of.

User avatar
tmesis
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2796
Joined: 16 Aug 2013 20:26

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by tmesis » 14 Dec 2023 22:05

Snowflake Royal
genome
WestYorksRoyal But it's not logical. Who in their right mind would reject a bid, put us into administration, lose control of the sale process and in all likelihood receive a lot less?

If none of the bids are up to his asking price, the only logical response would be to fund the club again, get it on firmer footing and then be in a stronger negotiating position. But we know that won't happen.

The worry is that he's just given up on a sale, and we continue the current way for years. Late HMRC payments, payday uncertainty, players leaving on frees. Who knows where that would end.


a slow death

No way it carries on for years. He's already got the sponsors paying wages. It's deal or liquidation.

He's also not going to refuse a deal only to put us in Adminstration and have the Administrators accept a worse deal he gets a smaller share of.

I wonder how much SCL are actually paying, as a % of the total salaries. If it's all then that can't be sustainable for long for them, as a business - and would indicate Dai has completely given up.

Is the money from China all Dai's money, or do club funds go over to China, to be paid back from there?

3412 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fluff and 560 guests

It is currently 27 Apr 2024 08:44