TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

3413 posts
WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5640
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 14 Mar 2024 23:02

tmesis
72 bus
blueroyals For those saying protests don't work, I'm fairly certain if we got every game abandoned from now until the end of the season, bringing the entire competition into disrepute, things would start to move very quickly


Yes, we would very quickly be ejected from the Football League.

Sadly there are still plenty of fans who seem to think the football league can do something to force Dai to sell.

I know they don't have the power, but they can definitely do more. If a club in their competition is going to die and they can't stop it, they should be the ones leading the effort to get government involvement and working with bodies such as councils to provide any protection possible. Instead it's business as usual and living by the rulebook so they can keep their power.

Bury folded in 2019 and Parry said "never again", the super league and its attempt to destroy the pyramid 2021. We also saw Derby on the brink but we still don't have an independent regulator. Why have the EFL not been at the forefront of pushing for this with a sense of urgency? Instead of looking at us as an inconvenience? They obviously don't take their role as custodians seriously enough.

So they can't force Dai to sell or block the training ground deal, but don't say they're blameless. It's very clear that saving us is not a priority

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5640
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 15 Mar 2024 07:12

I obviously don't agree with death threats or threats of violence, but football fans notoriously have a dark side. One day a situation like this may end very badly for a crooked owner. Pang and Dai will probably be fine as Reading fans aren't so bad, but Imagine how this would end if someone was doing this to a club like Leeds or Sunderland. I don't think these owners have a clue about the strength of feeling.

blythspartan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2261
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 20:50

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by blythspartan » 15 Mar 2024 07:37

There was some random poster on twitter last night saying that we were being sold next Thursday and that the training ground is still ours. I am not sure why people feel the need to makeup stuff like that.

Honestly I don’t know what to make of it anymore. The mass hysteria on Twitter seems OTT. There’s part of me that thinks Dai paid for it so he can do what he wants with Bearwood and at the same time I get annoyed as he appears to be asset stripping the club. Oh the joys of supporting RFC.

Orion1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3057
Joined: 14 Jul 2020 09:08
Location: Shut up, Dick

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Orion1871 » 15 Mar 2024 07:43

WestYorksRoyal I obviously don't agree with death threats or threats of violence, but football fans notoriously have a dark side. One day a situation like this may end very badly for a crooked owner. Pang and Dai will probably be fine as Reading fans aren't so bad, but Imagine how this would end if someone was doing this to a club like Leeds or Sunderland. I don't think these owners have a clue about the strength of feeling.


Pang reckons he can't be intimidated. Maybe we'll see if that is the case if they keep going like this.
Last edited by Orion1871 on 15 Mar 2024 07:53, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39975
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 15 Mar 2024 07:50

WestYorksRoyal
tmesis
72 bus
Yes, we would very quickly be ejected from the Football League.

Sadly there are still plenty of fans who seem to think the football league can do something to force Dai to sell.

I know they don't have the power, but they can definitely do more. If a club in their competition is going to die and they can't stop it, they should be the ones leading the effort to get government involvement and working with bodies such as councils to provide any protection possible. Instead it's business as usual and living by the rulebook so they can keep their power.

Bury folded in 2019 and Parry said "never again", the super league and its attempt to destroy the pyramid 2021. We also saw Derby on the brink but we still don't have an independent regulator. Why have the EFL not been at the forefront of pushing for this with a sense of urgency? Instead of looking at us as an inconvenience? They obviously don't take their role as custodians seriously enough.

So they can't force Dai to sell or block the training ground deal, but don't say they're blameless. It's very clear that saving us is not a priority

Parry literally sat in front of a parliamentary committee and said words to the effect of 'set it up now'.

It's those PL pcunts trying to block it and useless Tory pcunts not setting it up


Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 19700
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Stranded » 15 Mar 2024 08:00

tmesis
72 bus
blueroyals For those saying protests don't work, I'm fairly certain if we got every game abandoned from now until the end of the season, bringing the entire competition into disrepute, things would start to move very quickly


Yes, we would very quickly be ejected from the Football League.

Sadly there are still plenty of fans who seem to think the football league can do something to force Dai to sell.


Exactly, they can't - all they can do is try and change their rules so that when the next Dai comes along, which he will, they have more power to even stop the purchase.

All they can do is ban him, which gives him 28 day to sell the club, which he won't and then leaves everyone in uncharted territory.

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 19700
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Stranded » 15 Mar 2024 08:04

Greatwesternline One thing that is puzzling me is, whoever it is that is fronting up the money for this training ground purchase, why don't they want to buy RFC plus training ground instead?

Mention of some Georgian billionaire. Ok, if this person wants a training ground for £22m, why don't they want a training ground plus a club big enough to make use of it as well, for £35m.

If you have £20m for a few buildings and football pitches, you have the money for the other bits. What gives?

It is a lot more work and money to develop Wycombe into a club that needs a £20m academy, when you can pick up the ready meal variety in Reading instead.

The way it is going, you'll have a small club in a small town and small stadium and small fan base with a massive training facility, and down the road you'll have a big stadium big fan base but no club. It's a completely daft turn of events. And the money men would quickly work out that a big training ground makes a lot more sense to go with a big stadium and fan base.

If you want a big training ground, you would want the big fan base and stadium to go with it, not a pokey stadium with little chance to fill a bigger one.


This is a question I would be asking if I were a Wycombe fan as well. Why if this benefactor, this Georgian guy apparently, would be happy to spend 22m on the training ground but not either a) just buy us or b) complete a takeover of them.

The only answers are that

a) he doesn't give two tosses about football or who trains there and just wants to own the land/real estate - if so, and he has enough money, he'll probably find a way to get permission to turn it into something that earns a lot more money for him.

or

b) he stands absolutely no chance of ever passing the O&DT - which given the incredibly low bar it sets, should be firing off an incredible amount of alarms.

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6617
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Wycombe Royal » 15 Mar 2024 08:13

Do Wycombe even understand the cost of running this facility? It is way above what they need and has been draining money out of our club. The cost compared to their current training ground are going to be at least 10 times higher which I don't believe will be sustainable for them. It is absolutely crazy and if I was a Wycombe fan I would be very concerned.

Also their players aren't on huge wages, but now they have a 20 mile commute taking around 30 minutes every day. They aren't going to be over the moon at that. Same goes for their staff.

None of it make sense, both for RFC or Wycombe.

It's like my company with 80 staff, going and taking out a lease on 200,000 sq ft office, with a social club on the side with a pool and tennis courts.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5640
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 15 Mar 2024 08:14

Stranded
Greatwesternline One thing that is puzzling me is, whoever it is that is fronting up the money for this training ground purchase, why don't they want to buy RFC plus training ground instead?

Mention of some Georgian billionaire. Ok, if this person wants a training ground for £22m, why don't they want a training ground plus a club big enough to make use of it as well, for £35m.

If you have £20m for a few buildings and football pitches, you have the money for the other bits. What gives?

It is a lot more work and money to develop Wycombe into a club that needs a £20m academy, when you can pick up the ready meal variety in Reading instead.

The way it is going, you'll have a small club in a small town and small stadium and small fan base with a massive training facility, and down the road you'll have a big stadium big fan base but no club. It's a completely daft turn of events. And the money men would quickly work out that a big training ground makes a lot more sense to go with a big stadium and fan base.

If you want a big training ground, you would want the big fan base and stadium to go with it, not a pokey stadium with little chance to fill a bigger one.


This is a question I would be asking if I were a Wycombe fan as well. Why if this benefactor, this Georgian guy apparently, would be happy to spend 22m on the training ground but not either a) just buy us or b) complete a takeover of them.

The only answers are that

a) he doesn't give two tosses about football or who trains there and just wants to own the land/real estate - if so, and he has enough money, he'll probably find a way to get permission to turn it into something that earns a lot more money for him.

or

b) he stands absolutely no chance of ever passing the O&DT - which given the incredibly low bar it sets, should be firing off an incredible amount of alarms.

The club is losing money. That will be why too. Though one of the reasons we're losing money is that we can't afford to run Bearwood on a L1 budget, so not sure what Wycombe's plan is there.


Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 19700
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Stranded » 15 Mar 2024 08:20

WestYorksRoyal
Stranded
Greatwesternline One thing that is puzzling me is, whoever it is that is fronting up the money for this training ground purchase, why don't they want to buy RFC plus training ground instead?

Mention of some Georgian billionaire. Ok, if this person wants a training ground for £22m, why don't they want a training ground plus a club big enough to make use of it as well, for £35m.

If you have £20m for a few buildings and football pitches, you have the money for the other bits. What gives?

It is a lot more work and money to develop Wycombe into a club that needs a £20m academy, when you can pick up the ready meal variety in Reading instead.

The way it is going, you'll have a small club in a small town and small stadium and small fan base with a massive training facility, and down the road you'll have a big stadium big fan base but no club. It's a completely daft turn of events. And the money men would quickly work out that a big training ground makes a lot more sense to go with a big stadium and fan base.

If you want a big training ground, you would want the big fan base and stadium to go with it, not a pokey stadium with little chance to fill a bigger one.


This is a question I would be asking if I were a Wycombe fan as well. Why if this benefactor, this Georgian guy apparently, would be happy to spend 22m on the training ground but not either a) just buy us or b) complete a takeover of them.

The only answers are that

a) he doesn't give two tosses about football or who trains there and just wants to own the land/real estate - if so, and he has enough money, he'll probably find a way to get permission to turn it into something that earns a lot more money for him.

or

b) he stands absolutely no chance of ever passing the O&DT - which given the incredibly low bar it sets, should be firing off an incredible amount of alarms.

The club is losing money. That will be why too. Though one of the reasons we're losing money is that we can't afford to run Bearwood on a L1 budget, so not sure what Wycombe's plan is there.


But it depends on the deal this benefactor gives them - will he be covering the running costs and they pay minimal to zero rent. Will they just mothball or the things they don't need. Will then find someone to rent pitches/out buildings from them.

If Wycombe just end up as glorified tenants, then unless they have a watertight contract, I would be worried that they will also be out on their ear when someone else fancies a lovely top flight ready training ground. After all Bearwood isn't exactly a million miles from London, could easily appeal to a club there whose players all live in Surrey and are having trouble building new or improving existing facilities.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5640
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 15 Mar 2024 08:26

Stranded
WestYorksRoyal
Stranded
This is a question I would be asking if I were a Wycombe fan as well. Why if this benefactor, this Georgian guy apparently, would be happy to spend 22m on the training ground but not either a) just buy us or b) complete a takeover of them.

The only answers are that

a) he doesn't give two tosses about football or who trains there and just wants to own the land/real estate - if so, and he has enough money, he'll probably find a way to get permission to turn it into something that earns a lot more money for him.

or

b) he stands absolutely no chance of ever passing the O&DT - which given the incredibly low bar it sets, should be firing off an incredible amount of alarms.

The club is losing money. That will be why too. Though one of the reasons we're losing money is that we can't afford to run Bearwood on a L1 budget, so not sure what Wycombe's plan is there.


But it depends on the deal this benefactor gives them - will he be covering the running costs and they pay minimal to zero rent. Will they just mothball or the things they don't need. Will then find someone to rent pitches/out buildings from them.

If Wycombe just end up as glorified tenants, then unless they have a watertight contract, I would be worried that they will also be out on their ear when someone else fancies a lovely top flight ready training ground. After all Bearwood isn't exactly a million miles from London, could easily appeal to a club there whose players all live in Surrey and are having trouble building new or improving existing facilities.

I would be concerned as a Wycombe fan. Something just feels off. They have no need for a massive state of the art training ground. Has the feeling of some of Dai's early dealings. Though at least if it goes to shit for them there should be a regulator set up in time.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24984
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Hound » 15 Mar 2024 08:29

I think they have to monetise it in some way - I think they may hire the facilities out locally etc as well. That could be to us. Otherwise most of it just won’t be used

Even if they do this, I’m sure they’ll lose a load of money over it. Maybe the guy funding doesn’t care if that’s the case

Not sure on who else would want it - QPR? Doubt it, think their training grounds are quite nice anyway. Chelsea - nope. Only team I can think of is Brentford but it’s a trek from there still.

It is an odd one

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24984
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Hound » 15 Mar 2024 08:30

Smacks of buying something you can’t afford because you’ve been blinded by the fact it’s 50%. We’ve all done it


User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39975
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 15 Mar 2024 08:32

Hound I think they have to monetise it in some way - I think they may hire the facilities out locally etc as well. That could be to us. Otherwise most of it just won’t be used

Even if they do this, I’m sure they’ll lose a load of money over it. Maybe the guy funding doesn’t care if that’s the case

Not sure on who else would want it - QPR? Doubt it, think their training grounds are quite nice anyway. Chelsea - nope. Only team I can think of is Brentford but it’s a trek from there still.

It is an odd one

It would seem to be either a naive bet on loaning it back to us as shared facilities and that a state of the art training ground will help Wycombe grow and stick the Champ next time they get there. With maybe a sell back for profit element.

Which clearly is going to fall flat the second we go bust.

Or some sort of partial sell off for redevelopment. Which seems frought with planning issues.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24984
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Hound » 15 Mar 2024 08:33

Orion1871
WestYorksRoyal I obviously don't agree with death threats or threats of violence, but football fans notoriously have a dark side. One day a situation like this may end very badly for a crooked owner. Pang and Dai will probably be fine as Reading fans aren't so bad, but Imagine how this would end if someone was doing this to a club like Leeds or Sunderland. I don't think these owners have a clue about the strength of feeling.


Pang reckons he can't be intimidated. Maybe we'll see if that is the case if they keep going like this.


I think they’d probably need to be very careful about their personal safety if they do drive it under

I still don’t get why you’d make yourself so hated for money which shouldn’t apparently make a dent on his wealth. If he’d sold up in the summer for a reasonable price we’d have waved him off saying you fcked up but no hard feelings pretty much.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24984
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Hound » 15 Mar 2024 08:35

Snowflake Royal
Hound I think they have to monetise it in some way - I think they may hire the facilities out locally etc as well. That could be to us. Otherwise most of it just won’t be used

Even if they do this, I’m sure they’ll lose a load of money over it. Maybe the guy funding doesn’t care if that’s the case

Not sure on who else would want it - QPR? Doubt it, think their training grounds are quite nice anyway. Chelsea - nope. Only team I can think of is Brentford but it’s a trek from there still.

It is an odd one

It would seem to be either a naive bet on loaning it back to us as shared facilities and that a state of the art training ground will help Wycombe grow and stick the Champ next time they get there. With maybe a sell back for profit element.

Which clearly is going to fall flat the second we go bust.

Or some sort of partial sell off for redevelopment. Which seems frought with planning issues.


I could actually get on board with both clubs sharing the facility long term and sharing costs. It’s too big for a champ club let alone a L1 side. Neither of us will be in the PL ever again probably

Obvs that’s not Dai’s intention though

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39975
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 15 Mar 2024 08:37

Hound
Snowflake Royal
Hound I think they have to monetise it in some way - I think they may hire the facilities out locally etc as well. That could be to us. Otherwise most of it just won’t be used

Even if they do this, I’m sure they’ll lose a load of money over it. Maybe the guy funding doesn’t care if that’s the case

Not sure on who else would want it - QPR? Doubt it, think their training grounds are quite nice anyway. Chelsea - nope. Only team I can think of is Brentford but it’s a trek from there still.

It is an odd one

It would seem to be either a naive bet on loaning it back to us as shared facilities and that a state of the art training ground will help Wycombe grow and stick the Champ next time they get there. With maybe a sell back for profit element.

Which clearly is going to fall flat the second we go bust.

Or some sort of partial sell off for redevelopment. Which seems frought with planning issues.


I could actually get on board with both clubs sharing the facility long term and sharing costs. It’s too big for a champ club let alone a L1 side. Neither of us will be in the PL ever again probably

Obvs that’s not Dai’s intention though

Yeah, there could be some sense to it as shared, although not so much if we're in the same division directly competing with each other.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24984
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Hound » 15 Mar 2024 08:44

Snowflake Royal
Hound
Snowflake Royal It would seem to be either a naive bet on loaning it back to us as shared facilities and that a state of the art training ground will help Wycombe grow and stick the Champ next time they get there. With maybe a sell back for profit element.

Which clearly is going to fall flat the second we go bust.

Or some sort of partial sell off for redevelopment. Which seems frought with planning issues.


I could actually get on board with both clubs sharing the facility long term and sharing costs. It’s too big for a champ club let alone a L1 side. Neither of us will be in the PL ever again probably

Obvs that’s not Dai’s intention though

Yeah, there could be some sense to it as shared, although not so much if we're in the same division directly competing with each other.


There is that - but sure something could be worked out

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5640
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 15 Mar 2024 08:56

Hound
Snowflake Royal
Hound
I could actually get on board with both clubs sharing the facility long term and sharing costs. It’s too big for a champ club let alone a L1 side. Neither of us will be in the PL ever again probably

Obvs that’s not Dai’s intention though

Yeah, there could be some sense to it as shared, although not so much if we're in the same division directly competing with each other.


There is that - but sure something could be worked out

Spygate every week. But agree it could definitely work. Probably large enough to segregate us properly?

Orion1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3057
Joined: 14 Jul 2020 09:08
Location: Shut up, Dick

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Orion1871 » 15 Mar 2024 09:02

Hound
Orion1871
WestYorksRoyal I obviously don't agree with death threats or threats of violence, but football fans notoriously have a dark side. One day a situation like this may end very badly for a crooked owner. Pang and Dai will probably be fine as Reading fans aren't so bad, but Imagine how this would end if someone was doing this to a club like Leeds or Sunderland. I don't think these owners have a clue about the strength of feeling.


Pang reckons he can't be intimidated. Maybe we'll see if that is the case if they keep going like this.


I think they’d probably need to be very careful about their personal safety if they do drive it under

I still don’t get why you’d make yourself so hated for money which shouldn’t apparently make a dent on his wealth. If he’d sold up in the summer for a reasonable price we’d have waved him off saying you fcked up but no hard feelings pretty much.


Agreed. The continued rubbing of the fans noses in it is maddening for even the most sane person. You only have to have one or two nutters and there could be a safety issue for them. It wouldn't reflect well on the fanbase and would lose hearts and minds from outside, but people with a screw loose rarely think much about wider repercussions.

It's not like Dai or Pang are completely anonymous either. Mayfair casino is well publicised as Dai's favourite hang out and Pang is listed on the government's website.

3413 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], super darren caskey and 528 guests

It is currently 27 Apr 2024 21:45