TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

3413 posts
WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5639
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 16 Mar 2024 09:20

I know I should be skeptical, but this does feel like the one. Not much room for Dai to move the goalposts as the stadium needs a club with it. It seems like Pang and Dai are involved given the training ground sale, plus I trust Earnshaw not to report it without covering off this point.

The main blockers I see are Wokingham council rejecting the change in planning permission as we all wanted them to yesterday, and on the pitch performances threatening relegation.

Win today and get the deal done to stave off additional points deductions and you'd say relegation risk is 5% max.

User avatar
Sutekh
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18705
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Undiscovered pyramid somewhere in Egypt

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Sutekh » 16 Mar 2024 09:25

WestYorksRoyal I know I should be skeptical, but this does feel like the one. Not much room for Dai to move the goalposts as the stadium needs a club with it. It seems like Pang and Dai are involved given the training ground sale, plus I trust Earnshaw not to report it without covering off this point.

The main blockers I see are Wokingham council rejecting the change in planning permission as we all wanted them to yesterday, and on the pitch performances threatening relegation.

Win today and get the deal done to stave off additional points deductions and you'd say relegation risk is 5% max.


Apparently the separate Bearwood sale came out of nowhere and caught NH on the hop as much as everyone else. Really can't wait to get these two serial communication failures finally out of the club.

User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6443
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by PieEater » 16 Mar 2024 09:34

Sutekh
WestYorksRoyal I know I should be skeptical, but this does feel like the one. Not much room for Dai to move the goalposts as the stadium needs a club with it. It seems like Pang and Dai are involved given the training ground sale, plus I trust Earnshaw not to report it without covering off this point.

The main blockers I see are Wokingham council rejecting the change in planning permission as we all wanted them to yesterday, and on the pitch performances threatening relegation.

Win today and get the deal done to stave off additional points deductions and you'd say relegation risk is 5% max.


Apparently the separate Bearwood sale came out of nowhere and caught NH on the hop as much as everyone else. Really can't wait to get these two serial communication failures finally out of the club.


It seems pretty clear to me that the leak about the sale/exclusivity next week on Friday was specifically done to avert fan protests at the game today.

I guess they are hoping fans wouldn't be stupid enough to do another pitch invasion and jeopardise the sale. I expect another call for patience from the club shortly.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39959
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 16 Mar 2024 09:58

WestYorksRoyal People have been crying out for us to be sustainable. Now a potential buyer is trying to buy us in a form with affordable costs, everyone is questioning it. If you buy Reading with Bearwood and everything, you need to stabilise as a Championship club quickly to make sense. Do we want owners who make that the cornerstone of their strategy, given a season can be ruin by injuries, referee performances and many other non controllables?

There's generally been a trend of unremittingly bad news.

Selling off and replacing Bearwood, which is ultimately unaffordable for us at this level isn't inherently bad.

What is bad is that we all know Dai is thoroughly untrustworthy. It's come out the blue, and there appears to be no plan for first team training, or what to do with the Academy. Again, the Academy is unaffordable at this level in its current form, and can't operate without Bearwood at the level it is. But Bearwood and the Academy are the two main assets with value we had. The Academy has produced a near endless supply of professional talent over the last 15 years. We've got thousands of first team appearances out of it, and tens of millions in fees. And that's having squandered a considerable number of players from it.

So this all could be positive news, if we had an owner we could trust and evidence there's some sort of longer term strategy. But we don't. So it's worrying and we assume the worst, because the worst has consistently been surpassed year on year.

User avatar
rabidbee
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3006
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 17:51
Location: Like a dog to vomit

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by rabidbee » 16 Mar 2024 10:01

No plan has been communicated to us, who are not actually party to the deal. It may be that the final deal includes provisions for us to continue training there until we find a new training ground.


User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39959
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 16 Mar 2024 10:04

rabidbee No plan has been communicated to us, who are not actually party to the deal. It may be that the final deal includes provisions for us to continue training there until we find a new training ground.

The statements and previous experience don't particularly lend themselves to that view.

andrew1957
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4338
Joined: 29 Sep 2006 14:40
Location: Reading

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by andrew1957 » 16 Mar 2024 10:07

Some are talking about Bearwood and the Academy being too expensive in L1 but I disagree. Surely the Academy can be a very profitable entity if you have owners with money. The likes of Nelson Abbey could have been sold in a couple of years for millions if he kept progressing as he was let alone Vickers and Harris. We let them all go for pence because the owner had no money. I honestly believe that we would get back to Championship status far quicker with the Academy continuing than by just buying or loaning other clubs cast offs. A well run Academy can be a great financial success.

Reading FC without a Cat 1 Academy just becomes another small struggling club whereas with a strong Academy and patient owners you can see us getting back to the PL eventually.

Where it all went wrong for Dai was not spending money on Bearwood and the Academy (which were investments) but spanking millions on Aluko, Jaoa, Pusca and a huge contract for Moore + others in a desperate gamble to get to the PL in a couple of seasons. If instead Dai had sold the likes of Moore when he had the chance and built the team with Academy youngsters and free transfers we would likely still be in the Championship and not in this awful mess.
Last edited by andrew1957 on 16 Mar 2024 10:19, edited 1 time in total.

Loafer
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11177
Joined: 30 Dec 2021 15:28

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Loafer » 16 Mar 2024 10:09

i have heard on the grapevine that a takeover is imminent from somebody who goes to the same hairdresser as ruben selles

traff
Member
Posts: 182
Joined: 16 Jun 2005 00:08

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by traff » 16 Mar 2024 10:16

Loafer i have heard on the grapevine that a takeover is imminent from somebody who goes to the same hairdresser as ruben selles


Is it Finn Hair in Woodley? as I heard they both enjoy the occasional Saveloy and a spam fritter from the chippy next door.


windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8065
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by windermereROYAL » 16 Mar 2024 10:18

Loafer i have heard on the grapevine that a takeover is imminent from somebody who goes to the same hairdresser as ruben selles


Must be true then if you posted it, break out the champers.

Loafer
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11177
Joined: 30 Dec 2021 15:28

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Loafer » 16 Mar 2024 10:52

windermereROYAL
Loafer i have heard on the grapevine that a takeover is imminent from somebody who goes to the same hairdresser as ruben selles


Must be true then if you posted it, break out the champers.

Wait and see

Unlike Brogue I am actually reputable and have knowledge of these things

I said years ago we would get relegated and everybody laughed at me and called me out... alas, whose laughing now?!

User avatar
rabidbee
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3006
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 17:51
Location: Like a dog to vomit

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by rabidbee » 16 Mar 2024 10:52

andrew1957 Some are talking about Bearwood and the Academy being too expensive in L1 but I disagree. Surely the Academy can be a very profitable entity if you have owners with money. The likes of Nelson Abbey could have been sold in a couple of years for millions if he kept progressing as he was let alone Vickers and Harris. We let them all go for pence because the owner had no money. I honestly believe that we would get back to Championship status far quicker with the Academy continuing than by just buying or loaning other clubs cast offs. A well run Academy can be a great financial success.

Reading FC without a Cat 1 Academy just becomes another small struggling club whereas with a strong Academy and patient owners you can see us getting back to the PL eventually.

Where it all went wrong for Dai was not spending money on Bearwood and the Academy (which were investments) but spanking millions on Aluko, Jaoa, Pusca and a huge contract for Moore + others in a desperate gamble to get to the PL in a couple of seasons. If instead Dai had sold the likes of Moore when he had the chance and built the team with Academy youngsters and free transfers we would likely still be in the Championship and not in this awful mess.

I do broadly agree, especially as I seem to recall that spending on the academy isn’t counted towards FFP. However, opting not to maintain the expense of a cat 1 academy is not the same as opting to have no academy. They go right down to cat 4.

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8065
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by windermereROYAL » 16 Mar 2024 10:54

This guy supposedly Thailand based has been breaking stories, he`s had a few stinkers but he correctly forecast bad news incoming last week. posted this a little while ago.

Hi #readingfc fans, been checking in with people since last night and a name that keeps popping up is Martin whitaker. Not fully sure of his involvement in this investment company as yet but understand he has been heavily involved is some capacity. Will try and find out more


https://twitter.com/HuangKad/status/1768948233353720222

Claims to work at the sports desk at the Bangkok news, when it`s actually the Bangkok post. an international correspondent with 574 followers.

Have to take it with a pinch I`m afraid.

JUST IN :D
I can exclusively reveal exclusivity has been agreed this morning. Deal to be completed this week. With announcements Thursday. #Readingfc
Last edited by windermereROYAL on 16 Mar 2024 11:41, edited 2 times in total.


The Royal Forester
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1485
Joined: 25 Dec 2015 13:53

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by The Royal Forester » 16 Mar 2024 10:56

This latest news has come from a Nigel Howe statement, I believe. I now expect a statement to be issued by Pang on Monday "Mr Dai can confirm that he has sold the Stadium to a mate, and is now looking to secure a buyer for the Club."

Orion1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3055
Joined: 14 Jul 2020 09:08
Location: Shut up, Dick

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Orion1871 » 16 Mar 2024 11:39

rabidbee
andrew1957 Some are talking about Bearwood and the Academy being too expensive in L1 but I disagree. Surely the Academy can be a very profitable entity if you have owners with money. The likes of Nelson Abbey could have been sold in a couple of years for millions if he kept progressing as he was let alone Vickers and Harris. We let them all go for pence because the owner had no money. I honestly believe that we would get back to Championship status far quicker with the Academy continuing than by just buying or loaning other clubs cast offs. A well run Academy can be a great financial success.

Reading FC without a Cat 1 Academy just becomes another small struggling club whereas with a strong Academy and patient owners you can see us getting back to the PL eventually.

Where it all went wrong for Dai was not spending money on Bearwood and the Academy (which were investments) but spanking millions on Aluko, Jaoa, Pusca and a huge contract for Moore + others in a desperate gamble to get to the PL in a couple of seasons. If instead Dai had sold the likes of Moore when he had the chance and built the team with Academy youngsters and free transfers we would likely still be in the Championship and not in this awful mess.

I do broadly agree, especially as I seem to recall that spending on the academy isn’t counted towards FFP. However, opting not to maintain the expense of a cat 1 academy is not the same as opting to have no academy. They go right down to cat 4.


Which may as well be no academy at all. Even on the off chance you do get kids who are half decent they are gone long before they even get a sniff of the under 16s, and the compensation is a joke.
Last edited by Orion1871 on 16 Mar 2024 11:48, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Winston Biscuit
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 33748
Joined: 05 May 2017 07:32
Location: HNA Thought Leader & Influencer

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Winston Biscuit » 16 Mar 2024 11:42

Pang's anonymous account tweeting that it'll be announced on Thurs


User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39959
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 16 Mar 2024 11:44

rabidbee
andrew1957 Some are talking about Bearwood and the Academy being too expensive in L1 but I disagree. Surely the Academy can be a very profitable entity if you have owners with money. The likes of Nelson Abbey could have been sold in a couple of years for millions if he kept progressing as he was let alone Vickers and Harris. We let them all go for pence because the owner had no money. I honestly believe that we would get back to Championship status far quicker with the Academy continuing than by just buying or loaning other clubs cast offs. A well run Academy can be a great financial success.

Reading FC without a Cat 1 Academy just becomes another small struggling club whereas with a strong Academy and patient owners you can see us getting back to the PL eventually.

Where it all went wrong for Dai was not spending money on Bearwood and the Academy (which were investments) but spanking millions on Aluko, Jaoa, Pusca and a huge contract for Moore + others in a desperate gamble to get to the PL in a couple of seasons. If instead Dai had sold the likes of Moore when he had the chance and built the team with Academy youngsters and free transfers we would likely still be in the Championship and not in this awful mess.

I do broadly agree, especially as I seem to recall that spending on the academy isn’t counted towards FFP. However, opting not to maintain the expense of a cat 1 academy is not the same as opting to have no academy. They go right down to cat 4.

It's not so much about the financial rules it's about financial stability. And a L1 club can't afford the £2m - £5m for a Cat 1 Academy when income is about £8m. But yes, completely right that its not about getting rid of the Academy, although clubs like Brentford manage perfectly well without one with good scouting and selling. It's about (hopefully temporarily) downgrading it to make it affordable.

User avatar
SouthDownsRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 9586
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 12:48

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by SouthDownsRoyal » 16 Mar 2024 11:47

Winston Biscuit Pang's anonymous account tweeting that it'll be announced on Thurs



I can’t wait for Thursday. I might book the day off work.

andrew1957
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4338
Joined: 29 Sep 2006 14:40
Location: Reading

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by andrew1957 » 16 Mar 2024 11:52

Snowflake Royal
rabidbee
andrew1957 Some are talking about Bearwood and the Academy being too expensive in L1 but I disagree. Surely the Academy can be a very profitable entity if you have owners with money. The likes of Nelson Abbey could have been sold in a couple of years for millions if he kept progressing as he was let alone Vickers and Harris. We let them all go for pence because the owner had no money. I honestly believe that we would get back to Championship status far quicker with the Academy continuing than by just buying or loaning other clubs cast offs. A well run Academy can be a great financial success.

Reading FC without a Cat 1 Academy just becomes another small struggling club whereas with a strong Academy and patient owners you can see us getting back to the PL eventually.

Where it all went wrong for Dai was not spending money on Bearwood and the Academy (which were investments) but spanking millions on Aluko, Jaoa, Pusca and a huge contract for Moore + others in a desperate gamble to get to the PL in a couple of seasons. If instead Dai had sold the likes of Moore when he had the chance and built the team with Academy youngsters and free transfers we would likely still be in the Championship and not in this awful mess.

I do broadly agree, especially as I seem to recall that spending on the academy isn’t counted towards FFP. However, opting not to maintain the expense of a cat 1 academy is not the same as opting to have no academy. They go right down to cat 4.

It's not so much about the financial rules it's about financial stability. And a L1 club can't afford the £2m - £5m for a Cat 1 Academy when income is about £8m. But yes, completely right that its not about getting rid of the Academy, although clubs like Brentford manage perfectly well without one with good scouting and selling. It's about (hopefully temporarily) downgrading it to make it affordable.


But the point is that it will be virtually impossible to run the club sustainably below PL level. Hardly any clubs below PL make no losses each year and so any future owner will be expending money and investing in the hope of eventually reaching the PL and becoming a Brighton or a Brentford. What you need is an owner who is willing to see the Academy as a long term investment.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5639
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 16 Mar 2024 11:52

This account has got a few things right. But you'd think that if exclusivity was signed pre kick off, you'd announce today to help the atmosphere. And surely from exclusivity to completion in a week is a pipe dream?

3413 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Sutekh and 574 guests

It is currently 27 Apr 2024 12:30