TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

3424 posts
User avatar
rabidbee
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3022
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 17:51
Location: Like a dog to vomit

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by rabidbee » 12 Apr 2024 10:19

bcubed I was in the town end at EP, with another 4000 die hards.


Wasn't the Town End the away end?

User avatar
rabidbee
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3022
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 17:51
Location: Like a dog to vomit

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by rabidbee » 12 Apr 2024 10:22

Crusader Royal
under the tin
rabidbee But why wouldn't you just go to Stockport or Tranmere?


This is something that's close to my heart.
It must be so, so tempting just to follow the "big boys" in urban areas like Greater Manchester. I have a lot of time for folk who actually choose to forego the United's, City's and follow the Stockport's, Orient's, Tranmere's, Port Vale's, Rochdale's of this world. One of my customers, a very old boy in Lower Earley still regularly travels up to watch his lifelong love, Oldham Athletic.
I feel that people like that are my brethren, as in the early 1970's this nobber used to photograph and note down the numbers of locomotives at Reading General, and on a Saturday morning those days, platform 5 was always very well populated with those spending a mere 25 minutes or so on a train for the choice of Arsenal, Chelsea, Spurs, et al. That same Saturday afternoon, I was in the town end at EP, with another 4000 die hards.



There is a whole ecosystem of fans
Last weekend Plymouth Parkway played Swindon Supermarine. Both teams had die hard fans who had chosen their team rather than the bigger ( but hardly glamorous) teams in their city/town.
I was gutted Bracknell missed out in the play-offs last year, as I would definitely have made the effort to see them at Twerton Park, maybe even at Chippenham and Weston. I haven't seen a Bracknell match for almost 30 years. Not sure I can drag my family to Southern League matches.

Tinpot Royal
Member
Posts: 596
Joined: 30 May 2017 10:48
Location: RG1

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Tinpot Royal » 12 Apr 2024 10:49

rabidbee
bcubed I was in the town end at EP, with another 4000 die hards.


Wasn't the Town End the away end?


Yes it was

Clyde1998
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1817
Joined: 04 Mar 2010 16:27

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Clyde1998 » 12 Apr 2024 11:34

WestYorksRoyal The Athletic estimates their revenue will hit c. £20m this season due to the US presence and sponsors that the TV series has generated. That's a mid table Championship budget. If they can hit those sort of levels, promotion from L1 is definitely achievable, but probably beyond them next season given the bulk of the squad was national league recently.

If they are up at £20m revenue, then they can get to the Championship. That's somewhat more than we were getting in the Championship.

Just reading the Athletic article now and it suggests their most recent sponsorship deals with United Airlines and SToK Coffee Brew came into effect in July of the current financial year. I wonder what the typical sponsorship is for a team of Wrexham's fanbase? I wouldn't be surprised if it was ten times lower than what Wrexham are getting.

Crusader Royal
Member
Posts: 72
Joined: 24 Dec 2023 14:07

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Crusader Royal » 12 Apr 2024 11:50

Tinpot Royal
rabidbee
bcubed I was in the town end at EP, with another 4000 die hards.


Wasn't the Town End the away end?


Yes it was


Only once segregation became a thing.
I have been to games when the Tilehurst End was the away end (official) and where everyone was just mixed in. Some games the South Bank was pretty much the away end !


Crusader Royal
Member
Posts: 72
Joined: 24 Dec 2023 14:07

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Crusader Royal » 12 Apr 2024 11:57

Fox Talbot
Crusader Royal
under the tin
This is something that's close to my heart.
It must be so, so tempting just to follow the "big boys" in urban areas like Greater Manchester. I have a lot of time for folk who actually choose to forego the United's, City's and follow the Stockport's, Orient's, Tranmere's, Port Vale's, Rochdale's of this world. One of my customers, a very old boy in Lower Earley still regularly travels up to watch his lifelong love, Oldham Athletic.
I feel that people like that are my brethren, as in the early 1970's this nobber used to photograph and note down the numbers of locomotives at Reading General, and on a Saturday morning those days, platform 5 was always very well populated with those spending a mere 25 minutes or so on a train for the choice of Arsenal, Chelsea, Spurs, et al. That same Saturday afternoon, I was in the town end at EP, with another 4000 die hards.



There is a whole ecosystem of fans
Last weekend Plymouth Parkway played Swindon Supermarine. Both teams had die hard fans who had chosen their team rather than the bigger ( but hardly glamorous) teams in their city/town.


The missing point of this post is surely that the match was played at HUNGERFORD - or are we meant to guess that from the poster's name?!


It wasn’t the ‘point’ at all. An interesting aside perhaps. There were Plymouth fans who had travelled up for a home game played 180 miles from their own ground but the point was that they follow Parkway not Argyle. Like fans at lots of London clubs opt for Harrow, Dulwich, Hanwell, Clapton etc rather than Sutton, Wimbledon or Orient let alone Fulham, West Ham or Chelsea !

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5658
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 12 Apr 2024 12:02

Clyde1998
WestYorksRoyal The Athletic estimates their revenue will hit c. £20m this season due to the US presence and sponsors that the TV series has generated. That's a mid table Championship budget. If they can hit those sort of levels, promotion from L1 is definitely achievable, but probably beyond them next season given the bulk of the squad was national league recently.

If they are up at £20m revenue, then they can get to the Championship. That's somewhat more than we were getting in the Championship.

Just reading the Athletic article now and it suggests their most recent sponsorship deals with United Airlines and SToK Coffee Brew came into effect in July of the current financial year. I wonder what the typical sponsorship is for a team of Wrexham's fanbase? I wouldn't be surprised if it was ten times lower than what Wrexham are getting.

Without sounding harsh, it can't last. How many people live around Wrexham to sustain it? The publicity their owners are generating is in its nature fickle and short term; Hollywood doesn't have a long attention span.

Their involvement can give them some golden years and leave them in a much better position when they finally leave, but long term I don't see how Wrexham can sustain a Championship team in the same way we can't sustain a Premier League club.

Population, geography and being a "big club" doesn't win you games and you will always get teams overperforming and underperformed these factors. But in the long term, they matter.

themwasthedays
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: 24 Nov 2023 16:34

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by themwasthedays » 12 Apr 2024 12:14

Several games immediately spring to mind when talking about the South Bank being the 'away end'; Millwall, Pompey, Villa, & 'shared' with numerous others

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 40027
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 12 Apr 2024 12:16

WestYorksRoyal The Athletic estimates their revenue will hit c. £20m this season due to the US presence and sponsors that the TV series has generated. That's a mid table Championship budget. If they can hit those sort of levels, promotion from L1 is definitely achievable, but probably beyond them next season given the bulk of the squad was national league recently.

Midtable? It's top end Champ. Not many clubs can beat that without parachute payments


Crusader Royal
Member
Posts: 72
Joined: 24 Dec 2023 14:07

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Crusader Royal » 12 Apr 2024 12:24

Might the fact that IIRC there is a minority shareholder of the club be an issue ?
Doesn’t one of the Thai’s still have some holding ?
Obviously Dai can’t sell their shares and if a new owner wants 100 % of the club then the small shareholder has a bit of a ransom situation.
I can’t remember the rules on acquiring a company, IIRC if you are buying more than a certain % of the shares you have to offer to buy the rest but I don’t think a small shareholder can be forced to sell.
I guess you could do what SJM did and change the structure of the club so the small shareholders own shares in a defunct company.
It may be a total red herring but just wondered if it might be something adding to conversations.
And it is RFC not REP that I’m thinking of.

Tinpot Royal
Member
Posts: 596
Joined: 30 May 2017 10:48
Location: RG1

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Tinpot Royal » 12 Apr 2024 12:32

Crusader Royal
Tinpot Royal
rabidbee
Wasn't the Town End the away end?


Yes it was


Only once segregation became a thing.
I have been to games when the Tilehurst End was the away end (official) and where everyone was just mixed in. Some games the South Bank was pretty much the away end !


Which is was as far back as I can remember (first game in 1989)

User avatar
Franchise FC
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11054
Joined: 22 May 2007 16:24
Location: Relocated to LA

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Franchise FC » 12 Apr 2024 13:48

Crusader Royal Might the fact that IIRC there is a minority shareholder of the club be an issue ?
Doesn’t one of the Thai’s still have some holding ?
Obviously Dai can’t sell their shares and if a new owner wants 100 % of the club then the small shareholder has a bit of a ransom situation.
I can’t remember the rules on acquiring a company, IIRC if you are buying more than a certain % of the shares you have to offer to buy the rest but I don’t think a small shareholder can be forced to sell.
I guess you could do what SJM did and change the structure of the club so the small shareholders own shares in a defunct company.
It may be a total red herring but just wondered if it might be something adding to conversations.
And it is RFC not REP that I’m thinking of.

I may be out of touch with this but i seem to recall there’s a compulsory purchase option when a particular ownership threshold is reached
It may be that I’m confusing that with the compulsory offer if a certain level is reached

User avatar
Sutekh
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18735
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Undiscovered pyramid somewhere in Egypt

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Sutekh » 12 Apr 2024 14:48

Tinpot Royal
Crusader Royal
Tinpot Royal
Yes it was


Only once segregation became a thing.
I have been to games when the Tilehurst End was the away end (official) and where everyone was just mixed in. Some games the South Bank was pretty much the away end !


Which is was as far back as I can remember (first game in 1989)


You used to be able to pay 50p(?) or something to walk through to the South Bank from the Town End and that was late 70s/early 80s so segregation didn't strike me as much of a thing at EP until the mid 80s when suddenly fences and Bristol City fans appeared.


User avatar
Sutekh
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18735
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Undiscovered pyramid somewhere in Egypt

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Sutekh » 12 Apr 2024 15:02

rabidbee
Crusader Royal
under the tin
This is something that's close to my heart.
It must be so, so tempting just to follow the "big boys" in urban areas like Greater Manchester. I have a lot of time for folk who actually choose to forego the United's, City's and follow the Stockport's, Orient's, Tranmere's, Port Vale's, Rochdale's of this world. One of my customers, a very old boy in Lower Earley still regularly travels up to watch his lifelong love, Oldham Athletic.
I feel that people like that are my brethren, as in the early 1970's this nobber used to photograph and note down the numbers of locomotives at Reading General, and on a Saturday morning those days, platform 5 was always very well populated with those spending a mere 25 minutes or so on a train for the choice of Arsenal, Chelsea, Spurs, et al. That same Saturday afternoon, I was in the town end at EP, with another 4000 die hards.



There is a whole ecosystem of fans
Last weekend Plymouth Parkway played Swindon Supermarine. Both teams had die hard fans who had chosen their team rather than the bigger ( but hardly glamorous) teams in their city/town.
I was gutted Bracknell missed out in the play-offs last year, as I would definitely have made the effort to see them at Twerton Park, maybe even at Chippenham and Weston. I haven't seen a Bracknell match for almost 30 years. Not sure I can drag my family to Southern League matches.


Yes that was annoying esp. if they'd managed to hang onto to their lead at home to Weston in the first mach of the season instead of conceding a 96th minute equaliser they might have made it as Champions but instead got bogey team Truro (Bracknell have lost every single game against them (P6 L6)) in the play offs.

Mid Sussex Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3294
Joined: 02 Nov 2008 17:56

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Mid Sussex Royal » 12 Apr 2024 15:06

Sutekh
Tinpot Royal
Crusader Royal
Only once segregation became a thing.
I have been to games when the Tilehurst End was the away end (official) and where everyone was just mixed in. Some games the South Bank was pretty much the away end !


Which is was as far back as I can remember (first game in 1989)


You used to be able to pay 50p(?) or something to walk through to the South Bank from the Town End and that was late 70s/early 80s so segregation didn't strike me as much of a thing at EP until the mid 80s when suddenly fences and Bristol City fans appeared.


The Town End became designated away fans only in early 1980's, when the first fences were put up following issues and pitch invasions with Bristol City as above, and Portsmouth also caused a number of problems in 1977 & 1979. A few years later the stand nearest the town end (A stand I think it was) was also designated away.

under the tin
Member
Posts: 970
Joined: 15 Jan 2010 09:21

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by under the tin » 12 Apr 2024 16:51

rabidbee
bcubed I was in the town end at EP, with another 4000 die hards.


Wasn't the Town End the away end?

Very Early seventies, pre-segregation.
I can remember a game vs. Sheff Weds around that time, can't be exact about the date, but I remember their star player was called Roger Wylde. By kick off there must have been 1500+ of their fans singing under the tin. in the South Bank. :lol: :lol:

User avatar
LUX
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12737
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:38
Location: Keep this frequency clear

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by LUX » 12 Apr 2024 20:32

Dec 1976, just before Xmas iirc. Evening match.

Other teams that completely took over the Southbank in those days were Pompey twice, Oxford and, perhaps surprisingly, Northampton.

User avatar
Brogue
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10798
Joined: 02 Mar 2021 20:38

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Brogue » 12 Apr 2024 21:51

LUX Dec 1976, just before Xmas iirc. Evening match.

Other teams that completely took over the Southbank in those days were Pompey twice, Oxford and, perhaps surprisingly, Northampton.


Swansea were the worst weren’t they? completely destroyed the Oxford road. Causing thousands of pounds worth of improvements. It was them that spray painted Reading west bridge over the occy road I’m sure.

South Coast Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5737
Joined: 16 Jan 2020 17:29

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by South Coast Royal » 13 Apr 2024 11:56

Crusader Royal
Tinpot Royal
rabidbee
Wasn't the Town End the away end?


Yes it was


Only once segregation became a thing.
I have been to games when the Tilehurst End was the away end (official) and where everyone was just mixed in. Some games the South Bank was pretty much the away end !


In my early days we would swap ends depending upon which way Reading were kicking.

User avatar
Lower West
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4923
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:35
Location: Admiring Clem Morfuni at Work

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Lower West » 13 Apr 2024 12:41

Franchise FC
Crusader Royal Might the fact that IIRC there is a minority shareholder of the club be an issue ?
Doesn’t one of the Thai’s still have some holding ?
Obviously Dai can’t sell their shares and if a new owner wants 100 % of the club then the small shareholder has a bit of a ransom situation.
I can’t remember the rules on acquiring a company, IIRC if you are buying more than a certain % of the shares you have to offer to buy the rest but I don’t think a small shareholder can be forced to sell.
I guess you could do what SJM did and change the structure of the club so the small shareholders own shares in a defunct company.
It may be a total red herring but just wondered if it might be something adding to conversations.
And it is RFC not REP that I’m thinking of.

I may be out of touch with this but i seem to recall there’s a compulsory purchase option when a particular ownership threshold is reached
It may be that I’m confusing that with the compulsory offer if a certain level is reached


There maybe a shareholder agreement in place. Minority shareholders often protect themselves against being bulldozed by a majority shakeholder.

The US consortium may well have an interest in acquiring the land next to the ground. To achieve a return on their investment. The football club itself holds just under a 25% stake. Far more complex set of negotiations going on behind the scenses. With many vested interests.

3424 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 205 guests

It is currently 30 Apr 2024 18:24