by flintyboy73 » 06 Feb 2007 22:12
by Mozzle » 06 Feb 2007 22:23
by Huntley & Palmer » 06 Feb 2007 22:25
by flintyboy73 » 06 Feb 2007 22:26
Mozzle The table is on football365:
http://stats.football365.com/dom/ENG/PR/fsthalf.html
(probably where the independent got their info from)
Shame we aren't so good in the second half
by Platypuss » 06 Feb 2007 22:28
by londinium » 06 Feb 2007 22:34
by Greenwich Royal » 06 Feb 2007 23:30
by Rob-Royal » 07 Feb 2007 09:04
by Stranded » 07 Feb 2007 10:09
Greenwich Royal If anyhing it says more positive things about us. Our actual total is only 3 less!!!! That translates to us consistantly hanging onto leads / draws.
by Tony Le Mesmer » 07 Feb 2007 10:13
by Royalupnorth » 07 Feb 2007 10:16
Huntley & Palmer We are also joint 4th top scorers in the league with Liverpool. It's a shame we have conceeded so many but this is obviously being addressed with the signings in the window and hopefully a goalkeeper in the summer.
by Ian Royal » 07 Feb 2007 10:48
by URZZZZZZZZ » 07 Feb 2007 10:48
RoyalupnorthHuntley & Palmer We are also joint 4th top scorers in the league with Liverpool. It's a shame we have conceeded so many but this is obviously being addressed with the signings in the window and hopefully a goalkeeper in the summer.
Federici was great against birmingham, and we have that new icelandic(?) lad we bought in january.
I don't see a need to go all silly with goalkeepers
by MartinRdg » 07 Feb 2007 10:52
Royalupnorth
Federici was great against birmingham, and we have that new icelandic(?) lad we bought in january.
I don't see a need to go all silly with goalkeepers
by Tony Le Mesmer » 07 Feb 2007 12:35
by Huntley & Palmer » 07 Feb 2007 12:37
RoyalupnorthHuntley & Palmer We are also joint 4th top scorers in the league with Liverpool. It's a shame we have conceeded so many but this is obviously being addressed with the signings in the window and hopefully a goalkeeper in the summer.
Federici was great against birmingham, and we have that new icelandic(?) lad we bought in january.
I don't see a need to go all silly with goalkeepers
by Ian Royal » 07 Feb 2007 12:40
by Platypuss » 07 Feb 2007 12:55
StrandedGreenwich Royal If anyhing it says more positive things about us. Our actual total is only 3 less!!!! That translates to us consistantly hanging onto leads / draws.
And that was one game, Blackburn HT 1-0 lead turned into a 2-1 defeat.
by RobRoyal » 07 Feb 2007 13:44
PlatypussStrandedGreenwich Royal If anyhing it says more positive things about us. Our actual total is only 3 less!!!! That translates to us consistantly hanging onto leads / draws.
And that was one game, Blackburn HT 1-0 lead turned into a 2-1 defeat.
What about Newcastle?
You both seem to be forgetting that our actual points total also includes games where we have gone on to do better after half time.
"That translates to us consistantly hanging onto leads / draws."
Not borne out by the stats:
Points Lost
Lose When Winning 3
Draw When Winning 2
Points Lost 13
Rank 16
Only Charlton, Newcastle, Sheffield and Wigan are worse.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], GURoyal, Polish International, RFCMod, Snowflake Royal, Starry Blue Hooped Wonder and 235 guests