Sharpy predictable mods post
Predictable "thicker than a whale sandwich" post.
Stamp your little feet a bit harder in future, that might just work.

by Platypuss » 26 Jan 2007 21:11
Sharpy predictable mods post
by Winchester Royal » 26 Jan 2007 21:12
by The Cube » 26 Jan 2007 21:13
Yellow Jackets However, the point people seem to miss here is that a large proportion of these away fans simply wont be coming back for the next game at the Madejski
by Platypuss » 26 Jan 2007 21:14
The CubeYellow Jackets However, the point people seem to miss here is that a large proportion of these away fans simply wont be coming back for the next game at the Madejski
Completely irrelevant. I more-or-less agree with everything else you wrote, but until the problem of unfair treatment is sorted out you will have no support from me, or I suspect many others. If the club and stewards have still failed to understand this point, there is no hope EVER for a solution that all parties will find acceptable.
by shadesrwrf » 26 Jan 2007 21:38
by midlandadie » 26 Jan 2007 22:22
by working class hero » 26 Jan 2007 23:37
Winchester Royalworking class heroSeeing people slung out for standing is likely to discourage you from doing the same.
The writer was referring to away fans - but it must also be true for home fans so where is the problem????
PErhaps thae answer is for stewards to record seat numbers and the club could then rescind access for the next 5 home games and also prevent culprits from buying away tickets? Even fine persistent offenders 100 loyalty points per offence...
Frankly I get miffed at the antics of some of our so-called hard core fans. They only think of their own fun - and sod everyone else. LEt the reasonable fans take the upper hand.
What difference does it make to you if people in the back few rows are standing up?
Fining Royalty points is ludicrous. Why should a fan lose the rewards they've earned from spending shitloads of money on the club, just for standing up and supporting thier team?
What 'antics' are you referring to?
Fans could be prewarned that their area was to be made standing, and have plenty of notice to relocate if they didn't want to be in a standing area.
Given the club's extending the stadium, theres plenty of room.
by working class hero » 26 Jan 2007 23:57
Surely if you're a steward then you should expect abuse?
by AthleticoSpizz » 27 Jan 2007 00:05
by Skin » 27 Jan 2007 00:34
AthleticoSpizz too many are more bothered in watching the bullsh1t going on around them....than actually watching the game
working class heroSurely if you're a steward then you should expect abuse?
Only if you are working with mental defectives. Most people can remain civil when confronted with a steward.
by working class hero » 27 Jan 2007 00:38
SkinAthleticoSpizz too many are more bothered in watching the bullsh1t going on around them....than actually watching the game
What are you going on about? Where did that come from???
by Winchester Royal » 27 Jan 2007 02:05
working class heroSurely if you're a steward then you should expect abuse?
Only if you are working with mental defectives. Most people can remain civil when confronted with a steward.
by Forbury Lion » 27 Jan 2007 09:31
by Royal Lady » 27 Jan 2007 09:59
by zac naloen » 27 Jan 2007 11:01
Can you identify where they are, maybe you could take photos of those fans to back up your argument? In fact, scrap that, Cameras are dangerous, and if there was a fight you might hit somebody with it... I think that opinion is ridiculous. Do you not enjoy the banter between the fans? The traditional football atmosphere, its all a bit of fun... Why must you get so hung up on what other people are doing?
by Dai Brainbocs » 27 Jan 2007 11:18
zac naloenCan you identify where they are, maybe you could take photos of those fans to back up your argument? In fact, scrap that, Cameras are dangerous, and if there was a fight you might hit somebody with it... I think that opinion is ridiculous. Do you not enjoy the banter between the fans? The traditional football atmosphere, its all a bit of fun... Why must you get so hung up on what other people are doing?
The idea that you aren't allowed professional cameras because they are dangerous is ridiculous. I'd have thought it was far more likely they are banned because of contractual conflicts with bbc and sky/ newspapers. Only their lot are allowed to take high quality photo's.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests