by The 17 Bus » 27 Dec 2008 14:19
by SLAMMED » 29 Dec 2008 20:15
southstand67SLAMMED At the end of the day, they are there for our safety.
Random question Slammed - and I don't want you to read anything into this; are you a steward?
by rabidbee » 29 Dec 2008 20:22
ankeny Im old school so I would rather see policemen standing around the ground then a lot of minimum wage legalised wannabe thugs telling us what to do.
by Dirk Gently » 29 Dec 2008 20:26
by rabidbee » 29 Dec 2008 20:31
Dirk Gently That's all a technicality, of course - in reality it's not like that at many grounds.
by Dirk Gently » 29 Dec 2008 20:34
rabidbeeDirk Gently That's all a technicality, of course - in reality it's not like that at many grounds.
Quite - it was a pair of coppers that told somebody near me to sit down early in the match yesterday, although they may also have been reacting to language being used.
Wouldn't disorderly conduct be a broad enough offence to justify a police intervening in any situation anyway?
by rabidbee » 29 Dec 2008 20:40
by RoyalBlue » 30 Dec 2008 10:50
jonboy29red there clueless had a argument with one today over the gate they use at half time for the smokers at the end of the game still closed causing a crush situation opened it and got told what was i doing!!!
by The 17 Bus » 30 Dec 2008 13:16
by jonboy29red » 31 Dec 2008 16:04
The 17 Bus Jonboy and RB, complain then direct to the club, see what they say, in all reality it is no use moaning on here then not doing anything about it.
by Gordons Cumming » 31 Dec 2008 16:44
jonboy29redThe 17 Bus Jonboy and RB, complain then direct to the club, see what they say, in all reality it is no use moaning on here then not doing anything about it.
all you will get its the same standered message back that your comments have been passed on to mr doyle and that he will look in to it i did report it to some one on the way out he said he would report it i dunno if he did or not
by bishbosh92 » 02 Jan 2009 22:14
Yh its JeffmadreadingfanThe 17 Bus Who is the Tango with the beard??
Seems to be right in the thick of all the problems, eyeballing fans all the time.
jeff i think
by SCIAG » 02 Jan 2009 22:59
jonboy29redThe 17 Bus Jonboy and RB, complain then direct to the club, see what they say, in all reality it is no use moaning on here then not doing anything about it.
your comments have been passed on to mr doyle
by jonboy29red » 03 Jan 2009 19:37
SCIAGjonboy29redThe 17 Bus Jonboy and RB, complain then direct to the club, see what they say, in all reality it is no use moaning on here then not doing anything about it.
your comments have been passed on to mr doyle
What's he got to do with it?
by Gordons Cumming » 03 Jan 2009 23:44
by working class hero » 04 Jan 2009 12:52
whos pulled me out three times for standing, even though i sit
by RoyalBlue » 10 Jan 2009 11:55
by Dirk Gently » 10 Jan 2009 12:01
RoyalBlue Whilst on the subject of stewards, top marks to the yellow coat who exercised common sense and discretion in allowing my kids to hand their flag over the wall last night. In the past some of the more jobs worths have immediately made them take it down. This guy realised that whilst it was slightly overlapping the top corner of the sponsors sign, it was in now way obsuring their name or anything else and allowed it to stay, despite the fact it was a televised match.
This was a situation of give on both sides, I think the steward saw me telling the kids to make sure that the flag covered as little of the board as possible, and shows that there are some good stewards at the Mad Stad. I think it also shows the value of trying to use the same stewards in the same areas of the stadium as much as possible so that they and the supporters get to know what each other is like.
by RoyalBlue » 10 Jan 2009 13:55
Dirk GentlyRoyalBlue Whilst on the subject of stewards, top marks to the yellow coat who exercised common sense and discretion in allowing my kids to hand their flag over the wall last night. In the past some of the more jobs worths have immediately made them take it down. This guy realised that whilst it was slightly overlapping the top corner of the sponsors sign, it was in now way obsuring their name or anything else and allowed it to stay, despite the fact it was a televised match.
This was a situation of give on both sides, I think the steward saw me telling the kids to make sure that the flag covered as little of the board as possible, and shows that there are some good stewards at the Mad Stad. I think it also shows the value of trying to use the same stewards in the same areas of the stadium as much as possible so that they and the supporters get to know what each other is like.
That's what it should be like - common-sense, flexible stewarding, with stewards having the authority to use their discretion to defuse situations (and having the intelligence to do so as well).
Agree also that continuity of stewards is a good thing - the problem is that when, every week, they are on the receiving end of the people who go to the game with a "them and us" attitude, many don't stay doing the job. Would you if you got abused every week for doing your job?
by murts_the_god » 10 Jan 2009 14:16
Dirk Gently Don't forget that the Police don't have jurisdiction over standing.
Standing is the ground regulations, which the stewards are there to enforce. The Police can only get involved to assist a steward after someone has been offensive to a steward or others or has refused to obey a steward's orders.
That's all a technicality, of course - in reality it's not like that at many grounds.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests