by Forbury Lion » 07 Sep 2006 11:19
by Stranded » 07 Sep 2006 11:42
Forbury Lion According to the ticket office there were just 450 left yesterday.
Just booked a couple online for a friend who had to wait until today to order as his kid only has 55 Royalty points and they want to sit together.
by southbank1871 » 07 Sep 2006 11:46
StrandedForbury Lion According to the ticket office there were just 450 left yesterday.
Just booked a couple online for a friend who had to wait until today to order as his kid only has 55 Royalty points and they want to sit together.
So, one would assume there's only 450 Charlton tickets left as well then.
by West Stand Man » 07 Sep 2006 12:07
by Spotters Badge » 07 Sep 2006 12:44
West Stand Man How many Charlton seats will remain unoccupied (from people who don't want them but had to buy in order to get a Man Utd ticket)? Probably loads- which might indicate that the club fcuked up again?
This linking system is being used because we want to ensure that tickets for the most popular games go to supporters who are also prepared to support the team in less high-profile fixtures.
We are also very keen to ensure the team are cheered on by full houses in all the games leading up to Christmas.
by Forbury Lion » 07 Sep 2006 12:52
by southbank1871 » 07 Sep 2006 13:04
Forbury Lion Surely Royalty points are proof that fans have attended less attractive fixtures and supported the team?
Forcing fans to buy tickets to two games when they may not be able to attend the second one isn't much of a reward.
by Stranded » 07 Sep 2006 13:09
Forbury Lion Surely Royalty points are proof that fans have attended less attractive fixtures and supported the team?
Forcing fans to buy tickets to two games when they may not be able to attend the second one isn't much of a reward.
by West Stand Man » 07 Sep 2006 13:28
Spotters BadgeWest Stand Man How many Charlton seats will remain unoccupied (from people who don't want them but had to buy in order to get a Man Utd ticket)? Probably loads- which might indicate that the club fcuked up again?This linking system is being used because we want to ensure that tickets for the most popular games go to supporters who are also prepared to support the team in less high-profile fixtures.
We are also very keen to ensure the team are cheered on by full houses in all the games leading up to Christmas.
by Spotters Badge » 07 Sep 2006 13:33
West Stand Man
And your point is ....?
by Spirit of Elm Park » 07 Sep 2006 13:50
by West Stand Man » 07 Sep 2006 13:57
Spotters BadgeWest Stand Man
And your point is ....?
You need to work harder at school
by Platypuss » 07 Sep 2006 14:13
StrandedForbury Lion Surely Royalty points are proof that fans have attended less attractive fixtures and supported the team?
Forcing fans to buy tickets to two games when they may not be able to attend the second one isn't much of a reward.
Whilst I agree the system is flawed, no-one's been forced to buy tickets for both?
The club made it pretty clear that the games will be un-linked on the 19th. If people were so up in arms about this they could have waited until then to purchase tickets.
by Platypuss » 07 Sep 2006 14:15
Spirit of Elm Park If tickets had gone on sale non linked, how many posters would have been complaining that they couldn't get a ticket because of some plastic?
by Stranded » 07 Sep 2006 14:18
PlatypussStrandedForbury Lion Surely Royalty points are proof that fans have attended less attractive fixtures and supported the team?
Forcing fans to buy tickets to two games when they may not be able to attend the second one isn't much of a reward.
Whilst I agree the system is flawed, no-one's been forced to buy tickets for both?
The club made it pretty clear that the games will be un-linked on the 19th. If people were so up in arms about this they could have waited until then to purchase tickets.
How many do you think will actually still be available on the 19th?
by West Stand Man » 07 Sep 2006 14:47
StrandedPlatypussStrandedForbury Lion Surely Royalty points are proof that fans have attended less attractive fixtures and supported the team?
Forcing fans to buy tickets to two games when they may not be able to attend the second one isn't much of a reward.
Whilst I agree the system is flawed, no-one's been forced to buy tickets for both?
The club made it pretty clear that the games will be un-linked on the 19th. If people were so up in arms about this they could have waited until then to purchase tickets.
How many do you think will actually still be available on the 19th?
That's the point I was making. If people were so up in arms about the linking then the easiest way to make a point would have been to wait until this date. If none had sold prior to the 19th then it would have been a clear message to the club that this system was not acceptable.
As it happens, 1,500+ people have chosen to buy and as such get tickets for both fixtures which would appear to show that the club weren't far off in the marketing for this.
by Hoop Blah » 07 Sep 2006 16:26
West Stand ManStrandedPlatypussStrandedForbury Lion Surely Royalty points are proof that fans have attended less attractive fixtures and supported the team?
Forcing fans to buy tickets to two games when they may not be able to attend the second one isn't much of a reward.
Whilst I agree the system is flawed, no-one's been forced to buy tickets for both?
The club made it pretty clear that the games will be un-linked on the 19th. If people were so up in arms about this they could have waited until then to purchase tickets.
How many do you think will actually still be available on the 19th?
That's the point I was making. If people were so up in arms about the linking then the easiest way to make a point would have been to wait until this date. If none had sold prior to the 19th then it would have been a clear message to the club that this system was not acceptable.
As it happens, 1,500+ people have chosen to buy and as such get tickets for both fixtures which would appear to show that the club weren't far off in the marketing for this.
Precisely, but don't expect Spotters Badge to agree !!
by Forbury Lion » 07 Sep 2006 16:41
With 450 tickets left as at yesterday do you think there will be any left by the 19th?StrandedForbury Lion Surely Royalty points are proof that fans have attended less attractive fixtures and supported the team?
Forcing fans to buy tickets to two games when they may not be able to attend the second one isn't much of a reward.
Whilst I agree the system is flawed, no-one's been forced to buy tickets for both?
The club made it pretty clear that the games will be un-linked on the 19th. If people were so up in arms about this they could have waited until then to purchase tickets.
by Forbury Lion » 07 Sep 2006 16:44
Maybe next season they'll link all the games then so you have to be a season ticket holder to attend? or how about linking the Arsenal game to every game after xmas so you have to pay for all those games in advance?West Stand ManStrandedPlatypussStrandedForbury Lion Surely Royalty points are proof that fans have attended less attractive fixtures and supported the team?
Forcing fans to buy tickets to two games when they may not be able to attend the second one isn't much of a reward.
Whilst I agree the system is flawed, no-one's been forced to buy tickets for both?
The club made it pretty clear that the games will be un-linked on the 19th. If people were so up in arms about this they could have waited until then to purchase tickets.
How many do you think will actually still be available on the 19th?
That's the point I was making. If people were so up in arms about the linking then the easiest way to make a point would have been to wait until this date. If none had sold prior to the 19th then it would have been a clear message to the club that this system was not acceptable.
As it happens, 1,500+ people have chosen to buy and as such get tickets for both fixtures which would appear to show that the club weren't far off in the marketing for this.
Precisely, but don't expect Spotters Badge to agree !!
by savage 4 england » 07 Sep 2006 18:06
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 219 guests