by Maguire » 17 Jun 2010 17:48
by Seal » 17 Jun 2010 17:48
floyd__streete ^ LOL @ HD, the Emperor's New Clothes of television. Do you get free magic beans if you buy an HD tv?Maguire Murked myself a bit here as i've just tried to watch NIG v GRE with Radio 5 commentary and it turned out to be a bird
I don't think that Jacqui Oatley is all that bad tbh. Oatley > Drury > Tyldesley.
by PEARCEY » 17 Jun 2010 18:11
floyd__streete ^ LOL @ HD, the Emperor's New Clothes of television. Do you get free magic beans if you buy an HD tv?Maguire Murked myself a bit here as i've just tried to watch NIG v GRE with Radio 5 commentary and it turned out to be a bird
I don't think that Jacqui Oatley is all that bad tbh. Oatley > Drury > Tyldesley.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 17 Jun 2010 18:36
ScottishRoyal However I disagree with Rev A in that this level of journalism is the same across all sports media, it can improve. Take the following examples;
As for the crux of the issue discussed, the lack of research, it really is quite embarrassing. In any form of consultancy, research or academic work this is a pre-requisite for good work. If you don't do it you don't get repeat business or a good grade. Sadly ITV is so bad that the BBC don't feel the need to up their game either.
by TFF » 17 Jun 2010 22:16
by floyd__streete » 17 Jun 2010 23:37
Rev Algenon Stickleback H what also grates with me is when you get a world cup match between two lesser nations, particularly on the BBC, they smugly sit around with a "who cares about this shitty game?" attitude as if it's beneath them to even discuss it. They somehow fail to grasp that even though they couldn't give a toss about the match, the people who have tuned in specifically to watch the game, might.
by ScottishRoyal » 17 Jun 2010 23:55
floyd__streeteRev Algenon Stickleback H what also grates with me is when you get a world cup match between two lesser nations, particularly on the BBC, they smugly sit around with a "who cares about this shitty game?" attitude as if it's beneath them to even discuss it. They somehow fail to grasp that even though they couldn't give a toss about the match, the people who have tuned in specifically to watch the game, might.
The BBC are so massively smug and self-congratulatory in each and every way, how can their condescending coverage come as surprise as anyone?
by Dirk Gently » 23 Jun 2010 13:53
by Terminal Boardom » 23 Jun 2010 14:29
by Silver Fox » 23 Jun 2010 14:56
by Silver Fox » 23 Jun 2010 15:03
by rfcjoe » 23 Jun 2010 15:04
by Once were Biscuitmen » 23 Jun 2010 17:18
by T.R.O.L.I. » 23 Jun 2010 17:20
by Whore Jackie » 23 Jun 2010 17:25
by Kitsondinho » 23 Jun 2010 18:59
Whore Jackie BBC have got last 16 and QF I believe.
by Dirk Gently » 23 Jun 2010 20:33
KitsondinhoWhore Jackie BBC have got last 16 and QF I believe.
Correct and should we get to the Semi Finals (stop sniggering....it could happen![]()
) then BOTH channels show it......as they will the final, whoever is in it.
by 6ft Kerplunk » 23 Jun 2010 20:36
by TFF » 23 Jun 2010 21:05
6ft Kerplunk Why is Drury finding it so difficult to understand that by having a Ghanaian father and not having played a senior international for Germany means that he can play for Ghana?
by Arch » 24 Jun 2010 00:51
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests