by sandman » 02 Sep 2013 22:23
by blueroyals » 02 Sep 2013 22:23
Sydneyroyal Reads like a lot of frenzied despair by people who are upset that Reading were unable to sort out deals. Hammond's fault? Chairman's fault? Maybe the despair is caused by the supporters for expecting far too much and putting out silly posts on HNA. With so many rumours we were only ever going to disappoint ourselves. Let's get excited by the possibility of a good loan signing.... Then something at Christmas, then next year's summer market. I'm going to sit back and support the team we have. BM did a lot with not much. Made it all the sweeter. NA has, in my opinion, a better team without any signings today, and a better style of playing.
by rfc58 » 03 Sep 2013 07:38
by Waylenstreet » 03 Sep 2013 07:53
by glass half full » 03 Sep 2013 08:18
by Waylenstreet » 03 Sep 2013 08:31
glass half full Personally. I would be happy with hovering around the champions league.....
by Gordons Cumming » 03 Sep 2013 08:40
by melonhead » 03 Sep 2013 12:53
sandman He can't... It's broken.
by melonhead » 03 Sep 2013 12:55
Tamworth_Royalmelonhead 8/10 for lackwits, but what in gods name is doombrains?take a long hard look at yourself
Yea Melonhead 26000 + comments in only 3 years, look in the mirror son look in the mirror Get a life
by Scutterbucketz » 03 Sep 2013 12:56
Gordons Cumming Reading Fc have always been poor communicators and this is just another example.....................
by TBM » 03 Sep 2013 13:09
ScutterbucketzGordons Cumming Reading Fc have always been poor communicators and this is just another example.....................
Who or what is the reason for it.......
by Elm Park Pasty » 03 Sep 2013 13:16
by FridaysGhost » 03 Sep 2013 21:15
Elm Park Pasty Friday's Ghost, just curious, how long have you been supporting Reading?
by Ian Royal » 03 Sep 2013 23:55
Waylenstreet Call me naive....but as it struck anyone else that maybe it suits someone if we stay just where we are..hovering around the Champions League ? That actually promotion would not suit the wider agenda at all ?
by southbank1871 » 04 Sep 2013 07:04
FridaysGhost There is a big problem on this site that people do not seem to understand the financials that run alongside success.
FridaysGhost Taking the last time we were promoted, had I been in charge of the squad ins and outs, we would have spent perhapd 25m more than we did. That may have kept us up which would have generated 100M, however, were we still relegated, our good players would actually have been worth more than we paid for them (unlike he Pog), they would have been cherry-picked at high prices by the new Prem teams and RFC would have made a profit both ways.
by Ian Royal » 06 Sep 2013 17:43
by Nameless » 06 Sep 2013 17:50
by Ian Royal » 06 Sep 2013 17:59
Nameless Ian the last time we were promoted was 2 seasons ago, you obviously missed it !
I think Friday's Ghost is referring to players like Rhodes as being investments that would have appreciated even if we had a bad season.
Doesn't alter the fact that he's talking rubbish. Would love to see his views on running the UK economy or sorting out Syria becasue I'm sure in his mind those are both dead easy......
by Nameless » 06 Sep 2013 18:03
Ian Royal
I don't see how we'd recoup more than £8m on Rhodes after a failed PL season with only League One pedigree, when his value had gone down £2m after a quality Championship season. And he's about the best case scenario you're likely to get for recouping money on a signing.
by FridaysGhost » 06 Sep 2013 21:49
Nameless Ian the last time we were promoted was 2 seasons ago, you obviously missed it !
I think Friday's Ghost is referring to players like Rhodes as being investments that would have appreciated even if we had a bad season.
Doesn't alter the fact that he's talking rubbish. Would love to see his views on running the UK economy or sorting out Syria becasue I'm sure in his mind those are both dead easy......
Users browsing this forum: Norfolk Royal and 49 guests