by The Quiet Man » 28 Nov 2012 15:09
by Royals-lad14 » 28 Nov 2012 15:43
by Pepe the Horseman » 28 Nov 2012 15:45
by Esteban » 28 Nov 2012 15:58
Lacoste Malky Mackay - Always has an Impact, plays good foorball
Poyet - Plays good football, a possibility
Hughes - Good with smaller clubs with less funds. Only has one bad job behind him
Dick - Record speaks for itself
Dolan - Served his time at the Academy, known for playing nice, progressive football with a passing 4231 formation
Chris Powell - Roberts would be happy
A european - Plenty of those.
Whoever we get doesn't HAVE to have had PL experience in the past. A lot of the managers managing in the Prem now didn't before and are making a good name for themselves now. Just look at Clarke, Moyes, Laudrup, Rodgers, Pardew and Houghton. As long as the philosophy is right and they know what they're doing, they can do a great job IMO.
It's all about picking the right man, charecter and philosophy regardless of PL experience.
by Upper West Ginger » 28 Nov 2012 16:04
by Alexander Litvinenko » 28 Nov 2012 16:05
by Allyh84 » 28 Nov 2012 16:09
by Alexander Litvinenko » 28 Nov 2012 16:10
Allyh84 If we had Jose Mourinho, I think we'd certainly stay up.
by Hoop Blah » 28 Nov 2012 16:16
Alexander LitvinenkoAllyh84 If we had Jose Mourinho, I think we'd certainly stay up.
Why, who would he play in midfield out of our current squad?
by Alexander Litvinenko » 28 Nov 2012 16:19
Hoop BlahAlexander LitvinenkoAllyh84 If we had Jose Mourinho, I think we'd certainly stay up.
Why, who would he play in midfield out of our current squad?
I think it's perfectly acceptable to assume he'd get a bit more out of the players we have because none of them, Shorey and Morrison apart probably, are playing as well as they can.
by Hoop Blah » 28 Nov 2012 16:36
by melonhead » 28 Nov 2012 17:13
The Quiet Man RDM failed in similar circumstances with WBA to be fair.
Don't see anyone english/scottish as credible at the moment or affordable given the cost of removing McD and prising another manager out of their contract guess about £2-3 million at championship level (if they would come)?
Perhaps Anton will appoint a Russian and we can get russian cast offs and out of season loans.
Anybody coming in half way through the season is really on a hiding to nothing with the current squad and the supposed lack of funds (Boris still hasn't given Anton any pocket money to spend on his new toy so the deep pockets are surprisingly empty). A younger more promising manager may well be destroyed in such circumstances.
by melonhead » 28 Nov 2012 17:14
Pepe the Horseman Glen Hoddle. Fo shiz.
by Pepe the Horseman » 28 Nov 2012 17:15
melonheadPepe the Horseman Glen Hoddle. Fo shiz.
id take that
would he be happy within our financial constraints though
by melonhead » 28 Nov 2012 17:18
by SPARTA » 28 Nov 2012 17:41
Esteban Hughes has spent a fortune everywhere he’s been and we don’t have a fortune to spend
by melonhead » 28 Nov 2012 17:48
SPARTAEsteban Hughes has spent a fortune everywhere he’s been and we don’t have a fortune to spend
What did he spend at Fulham? He did a very good job there without splashing the cash.
Mark Hughes left Fulham because he felt the club lacked ambition, he has revealed.
Hughes guided the south-west London club to eighth in the Premier League last season, but then quit in the summer.
His exit after just one season in charge caused dismay and anger among Fulham fans, and it was widely assumed he had quit because he thought he was going to replace Gerard Houllier at Aston Villa.
“The assumption was that I was jumping ship because I had another job to jump into," said Hughes. "People assumed I was hoping to get the Villa job, but that was never the case. It was never there for me.
“It was a point in time where I felt my ambition for where I wanted to take the club was not matched.
"Historically, Fulham was a club that was happy to be in the Premier League and that was their ambition, but it was not my ambition for them.
“I felt Fulham were probably a little bit too honest with me. In conversations, they were saying, ‘We know exactly what you’re about Mark, but, really, we are just quite happy to stay in the Premier League.’
“The offer was there for me to stay and if I had seen the next two years were going to be steady progression and they wanted to establish themselves in the top 10, then I would have signed it. But I didn’t really get that feeling.
“There were players that I wanted to sign for the club and those negotiations weren’t going well. I had given them a couple of names and I saw a slowing down of the process.
“They were saying, ‘We will do it’ and ‘We’re speaking’ and I read that as the fact that maybe they didn’t want to do these deals.
“I read that as maybe they didn’t want to take the club and keep them in the top half of the Premier League - which was my ambition.”
There was a clause in Hughes’ contract which permitted either him or or Fulham to terminate his deal without penalty on one day - June 1, 2011.
As the date grew nearer, the former Wales boss realised he did not want to commit himself to a longer contract and decided it would be best to “shake hands and walk away”.
“Fulham have been a team that is traditionally middle to lower,” Hughes said. “My view was that with a little bit of investment and little bit of longevity in terms of my tenure, they could be middle to top half.
by SPARTA » 28 Nov 2012 18:10
melonheadSPARTAEsteban Hughes has spent a fortune everywhere he’s been and we don’t have a fortune to spend
What did he spend at Fulham? He did a very good job there without splashing the cash.
true, although left cos they wouldnt spend even more:Mark Hughes left Fulham because he felt the club lacked ambition, he has revealed.
Hughes guided the south-west London club to eighth in the Premier League last season, but then quit in the summer.
His exit after just one season in charge caused dismay and anger among Fulham fans, and it was widely assumed he had quit because he thought he was going to replace Gerard Houllier at Aston Villa.
“The assumption was that I was jumping ship because I had another job to jump into," said Hughes. "People assumed I was hoping to get the Villa job, but that was never the case. It was never there for me.
“It was a point in time where I felt my ambition for where I wanted to take the club was not matched.
"Historically, Fulham was a club that was happy to be in the Premier League and that was their ambition, but it was not my ambition for them.
“I felt Fulham were probably a little bit too honest with me. In conversations, they were saying, ‘We know exactly what you’re about Mark, but, really, we are just quite happy to stay in the Premier League.’
“The offer was there for me to stay and if I had seen the next two years were going to be steady progression and they wanted to establish themselves in the top 10, then I would have signed it. But I didn’t really get that feeling.
“There were players that I wanted to sign for the club and those negotiations weren’t going well. I had given them a couple of names and I saw a slowing down of the process.
“They were saying, ‘We will do it’ and ‘We’re speaking’ and I read that as the fact that maybe they didn’t want to do these deals.
“I read that as maybe they didn’t want to take the club and keep them in the top half of the Premier League - which was my ambition.”
There was a clause in Hughes’ contract which permitted either him or or Fulham to terminate his deal without penalty on one day - June 1, 2011.
As the date grew nearer, the former Wales boss realised he did not want to commit himself to a longer contract and decided it would be best to “shake hands and walk away”.
“Fulham have been a team that is traditionally middle to lower,” Hughes said. “My view was that with a little bit of investment and little bit of longevity in terms of my tenure, they could be middle to top half.
which suggests he wouldnt want to come here
by Gunny Fishcake » 28 Nov 2012 18:16
Rusty royal Craig levein
by SPARTA » 28 Nov 2012 18:19
melonheadThe Quiet Man RDM failed in similar circumstances with WBA to be fair.
Don't see anyone english/scottish as credible at the moment or affordable given the cost of removing McD and prising another manager out of their contract guess about £2-3 million at championship level (if they would come)?
Perhaps Anton will appoint a Russian and we can get russian cast offs and out of season loans.
Anybody coming in half way through the season is really on a hiding to nothing with the current squad and the supposed lack of funds (Boris still hasn't given Anton any pocket money to spend on his new toy so the deep pockets are surprisingly empty). A younger more promising manager may well be destroyed in such circumstances.
not a massive fan of russian players in th eprem
seem to have a shit attitude, and are more often than not big failures
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests