by Riseley » 15 Nov 2007 11:50
by Schards#2 » 15 Nov 2007 11:57
Woodcote RoyalSchards#2SkylineRoyal LadyLOL How sad!Skyline According to this page on the official site, the capacity is actually 24161. The figure that is normally used (and that I used in my calcs) is 24200.
Interestingly that page also lists the 'normal away allocation' as 2327, which is 67 higher than the figure of 2260 that Andy West gave me and that I've been using for my calculations above.
What, sad that someone actually bothered to check the numbers rather than basing an entire argument on highly unreliable anecdotal evidence?
But why let the facts get in the way of a good old-fashioned rant, eh?
Pretty sad to spend your life churning out stats that don't demonstrate what you want them to demonstrate. Assuming you are trying to demonstrate the extent of the fall in demand.
Err, no.
What his stats demonstrate beyond all doubt is that the home stands are being filled to almost full capacity and, for most fixtures, to the point where only single seats remain.
In the real world, that means we need to expand the stadium should we wish to expand the fan base.
On other hand, in the world inhabited by Terry and June, any perceived drop in demand, however small, has to be clung to as if their very lives depend upon it, because there lies just the remotest chance that attendances will fall through the floor.
There's more chance of them being struck by lightening but it's the last chance saloon for their narrow minded views and the only alternative would be to admit that they were wrong.....................and if that isn't sad, I don't know what is.
by T.R.O.L.I. » 15 Nov 2007 12:14
by Schards#2 » 15 Nov 2007 12:21
by Wycombe Royal » 15 Nov 2007 12:24
Schards#2 Just as an aside, does anyone know how many 30,000+ crowds there have been in the Championship so far this season?
by Woodcote Royal » 15 Nov 2007 12:27
Schards#2Woodcote RoyalSchards#2SkylineRoyal LadyLOL How sad!Skyline According to this page on the official site, the capacity is actually 24161. The figure that is normally used (and that I used in my calcs) is 24200.
Interestingly that page also lists the 'normal away allocation' as 2327, which is 67 higher than the figure of 2260 that Andy West gave me and that I've been using for my calculations above.
What, sad that someone actually bothered to check the numbers rather than basing an entire argument on highly unreliable anecdotal evidence?
But why let the facts get in the way of a good old-fashioned rant, eh?
Pretty sad to spend your life churning out stats that don't demonstrate what you want them to demonstrate. Assuming you are trying to demonstrate the extent of the fall in demand.
Err, no.
What his stats demonstrate beyond all doubt is that the home stands are being filled to almost full capacity and, for most fixtures, to the point where only single seats remain.
In the real world, that means we need to expand the stadium should we wish to expand the fan base.
On other hand, in the world inhabited by Terry and June, any perceived drop in demand, however small, has to be clung to as if their very lives depend upon it, because there lies just the remotest chance that attendances will fall through the floor.
There's more chance of them being struck by lightening but it's the last chance saloon for their narrow minded views and the only alternative would be to admit that they were wrong.....................and if that isn't sad, I don't know what is.
His statistics demonstrate the gap between capacity and tickets sold, that is not the same as illustrating the fall in demand.
I've long ago accepted that you don't have the intelligence to understand this and that your capacity to discuss this doesn't extend beyond posting the sort of embarrasingly infantile rubbish that you just have.
by starbug » 15 Nov 2007 12:33
by Behindu » 15 Nov 2007 12:36
by Royal Lady » 15 Nov 2007 12:42
by Schards#2 » 15 Nov 2007 12:44
Woodcote RoyalSchards#2Woodcote RoyalSchards#2SkylineRoyal LadyLOL How sad!Skyline According to this page on the official site, the capacity is actually 24161. The figure that is normally used (and that I used in my calcs) is 24200.
Interestingly that page also lists the 'normal away allocation' as 2327, which is 67 higher than the figure of 2260 that Andy West gave me and that I've been using for my calculations above.
What, sad that someone actually bothered to check the numbers rather than basing an entire argument on highly unreliable anecdotal evidence?
But why let the facts get in the way of a good old-fashioned rant, eh?
Pretty sad to spend your life churning out stats that don't demonstrate what you want them to demonstrate. Assuming you are trying to demonstrate the extent of the fall in demand.
Err, no.
What his stats demonstrate beyond all doubt is that the home stands are being filled to almost full capacity and, for most fixtures, to the point where only single seats remain.
In the real world, that means we need to expand the stadium should we wish to expand the fan base.
On other hand, in the world inhabited by Terry and June, any perceived drop in demand, however small, has to be clung to as if their very lives depend upon it, because there lies just the remotest chance that attendances will fall through the floor.
There's more chance of them being struck by lightening but it's the last chance saloon for their narrow minded views and the only alternative would be to admit that they were wrong.....................and if that isn't sad, I don't know what is.
His statistics demonstrate the gap between capacity and tickets sold, that is not the same as illustrating the fall in demand.
I've long ago accepted that you don't have the intelligence to understand this and that your capacity to discuss this doesn't extend beyond posting the sort of embarrasingly infantile rubbish that you just have.
Thanks for underlining my point in typical fashion.
As everyone with a reading age of 5 and over will realise, you and June are the only ones still talking about demand (for the reasons previously stated)
Both Skyline and I have pointed out that his stats were not intended to demonstrate the strength of demand, merely to show that we have very few, if any, spare home seats and, therefore, we will need a bigger stadium should we avoid relegation and quite possibly if we don't........................but, as ever, you only read what you want to read.
FWIW, I long ago came to the conclusion that you lack the maturity to admit you are wrong, whilst hypocritally accusing others of personalisiing debates with insults, when the latest "SAD" incident is one of a long line employed by you and your side kick.
Frankly, I couldn't give a fcuk what you think about me but, for all the Stevie Wonder references and pictures of men wearing blindfolds, Riseley won't be the only one making sure this thread runs to it's logical conclusion.
by cmonurz » 15 Nov 2007 12:45
starbug Now I hear Mr Mad radio 5 before the Arsenal game talking about how it was for "someone else" to take over the club and start the stadium expansion. Then today we have Nigel Howe on the official site saying 'along with the potential development of Madejski Stadium into a 38,000 capacity'
It sounds like unless we find a buyer then there wont be any expansion, in fact I'd go as far to cynically say it was always going to be this way and getting the planning permission was a key factor in making the club a more attractive proposition to a buyer.
by Woodcote Royal » 15 Nov 2007 12:47
Schards#2Woodcote RoyalSchards#2Woodcote RoyalSchards#2SkylineRoyal LadyLOL How sad!Skyline According to this page on the official site, the capacity is actually 24161. The figure that is normally used (and that I used in my calcs) is 24200.
Interestingly that page also lists the 'normal away allocation' as 2327, which is 67 higher than the figure of 2260 that Andy West gave me and that I've been using for my calculations above.
What, sad that someone actually bothered to check the numbers rather than basing an entire argument on highly unreliable anecdotal evidence?
But why let the facts get in the way of a good old-fashioned rant, eh?
Pretty sad to spend your life churning out stats that don't demonstrate what you want them to demonstrate. Assuming you are trying to demonstrate the extent of the fall in demand.
Err, no.
What his stats demonstrate beyond all doubt is that the home stands are being filled to almost full capacity and, for most fixtures, to the point where only single seats remain.
In the real world, that means we need to expand the stadium should we wish to expand the fan base.
On other hand, in the world inhabited by Terry and June, any perceived drop in demand, however small, has to be clung to as if their very lives depend upon it, because there lies just the remotest chance that attendances will fall through the floor.
There's more chance of them being struck by lightening but it's the last chance saloon for their narrow minded views and the only alternative would be to admit that they were wrong.....................and if that isn't sad, I don't know what is.
His statistics demonstrate the gap between capacity and tickets sold, that is not the same as illustrating the fall in demand.
I've long ago accepted that you don't have the intelligence to understand this and that your capacity to discuss this doesn't extend beyond posting the sort of embarrasingly infantile rubbish that you just have.
Thanks for underlining my point in typical fashion.
As everyone with a reading age of 5 and over will realise, you and June are the only ones still talking about demand (for the reasons previously stated)
Both Skyline and I have pointed out that his stats were not intended to demonstrate the strength of demand, merely to show that we have very few, if any, spare home seats and, therefore, we will need a bigger stadium should we avoid relegation and quite possibly if we don't........................but, as ever, you only read what you want to read.
FWIW, I long ago came to the conclusion that you lack the maturity to admit you are wrong, whilst hypocritally accusing others of personalisiing debates with insults, when the latest "SAD" incident is one of a long line employed by you and your side kick.
Frankly, I couldn't give a fcuk what you think about me but, for all the Stevie Wonder references and pictures of men wearing blindfolds, Riseley won't be the only one making sure this thread runs to it's logical conclusion.
Evidently
by Schards#2 » 15 Nov 2007 12:48
Wycombe RoyalSchards#2 Just as an aside, does anyone know how many 30,000+ crowds there have been in the Championship so far this season?
I didn't know that we were planning for relegation?
by RoyalBlue » 15 Nov 2007 12:48
starbug maybe I've missed the discussion but has anyone else noticed the clubs shift in policy as regards the expansion, from talking about when to an IF ?
When first raised, the expansion was supposed to start at the end of the 06-07 season, then put back due to its potential impact on current seating capacity.
Now I hear Mr Mad radio 5 before the Arsenal game talking about how it was for "someone else" to take over the club and start the stadium expansion. Then today we have Nigel Howe on the official site saying 'along with the potential development of Madejski Stadium into a 38,000 capacity'
It sounds like unless we find a buyer then there wont be any expansion, in fact I'd go as far to cynically say it was always going to be this way and getting the planning permission was a key factor in making the club a more attractive proposition to a buyer.
by Schards#2 » 15 Nov 2007 12:50
Woodcote Royal Well done, that's 11 words you've read from one post, but not a bad choice, if I may say so..........................
by cmonurz » 15 Nov 2007 12:52
by Stranded » 15 Nov 2007 12:58
Royal Lady I know this has gone round in circles - but just for the hard of reading let me re-iterate where Schard and I happen to be coming from: We have stated that we're NOT against expansion per se, but feel it would be more prudent if we waited another couple of seasons at least. If we spend another 2/3 season in the Prem, we should expand as it would seem likely we could be in the Prem for a few more to come, if we struggle this year and just avoid relegation and do the same or are relegated next season, then we feel that a 30,000+ seater stadium for a Championship club would be madness. To try and support our thoughts, we have pointed out that, as it is, demand for tickets has fallen, to the extent that it is now possible to get tickets for some games even if you don't have a member card. As this would appear to indicate that many of those who wanted to go last year, are not so keen this year, then we felt that the club should be very wary of ploughing ahead with an expansion which could see us with swathes of empty seats at the majority of games. I do hope this helps.
by Royal Lady » 15 Nov 2007 12:58
cmonurz The decision is fairly simple for me, and as such should be delayed, for now. Are we a stable Premiership club? We will not use 1/3 of a 38,000 ground in the Championship - it would be a complete and utter waste of money and time, and a complete embarassment.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests