by Royalshow » 12 Dec 2007 17:02
by Royalshow » 04 Feb 2008 18:14
by The 17 Bus » 04 Feb 2008 19:32
by Royalshow » 04 Feb 2008 19:57
The 17 Bus so it is to be a private railway station, does this bode well for football traffic, somehow I doubt it.
by Deadlock » 05 Feb 2008 13:00
Royalshow Prudential wants to build 7,500 houses on the flood plain on the northern side of the M4.
by Skin » 05 Feb 2008 13:04
by Skyline » 05 Feb 2008 13:39
Royalshow Prudential wants to build 7,500 houses on the flood plain on the northern side of the M4.
by Reading Til I Die » 05 Feb 2008 14:31
by The Surgeon of Crowthorne » 05 Feb 2008 14:50
by The 17 Bus » 05 Feb 2008 18:41
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 05 Feb 2008 20:01
how does a private railway station differ from the rest of the privately owned rail network?The 17 Bus so it is to be a private railway station, does this bode well for football traffic, somehow I doubt it.
by The 17 Bus » 05 Feb 2008 20:06
by Royalshow » 05 Feb 2008 20:41
by Platypuss » 05 Feb 2008 21:59
The Surgeon of Crowthorne To continue OT - Prudential also own the old TRL site in Crowthorne & plan to turn that into 1000 homes.
by The Surgeon of Crowthorne » 06 Feb 2008 09:54
PlatypussThe Surgeon of Crowthorne To continue OT - Prudential also own the old TRL site in Crowthorne & plan to turn that into 1000 homes.
No they don't - that's Legal and General.
by Platypuss » 06 Feb 2008 10:05
The Surgeon of CrowthornePlatypussThe Surgeon of Crowthorne To continue OT - Prudential also own the old TRL site in Crowthorne & plan to turn that into 1000 homes.
No they don't - that's Legal and General.
Ah - oops. Memory failing me again. I felt sure it was the Pru.
by purleyroyal » 06 Feb 2008 13:33
The 17 Bus Except that it will no longer be a flood plain as they have managed to make a lake south of the M4 for the water to go.
Lower Earley used to be a flood plain, but thats ok, it is all down to how water is managed.
by Upper West Ginger » 07 Feb 2008 12:47
by Symposium » 07 Feb 2008 20:17
SkylineRoyalshow Prudential wants to build 7,500 houses on the flood plain on the northern side of the M4.
Anybody else see the irony in a large insurance company wanting to build homes on a flood plain, when it's the insurance industry that's been amongst the most strident in opposition to such plans?
OK, I know the Pru's insurance operations are primarily in life assurance rather than home insurance, but it still looks distinctly odd.
by Symposium » 07 Feb 2008 20:23
Reading Til I Die The way things are going at the Prudential I expect them to get very heavily involved in the New Homes/Affordable Homes market.
They're shipping all there work to existing pensions servicing work India, the call centres are in India and they're closing offices they have in Scotland. On top of that the Reading offices will only hold about 100-200 UK-based employees throughout the whole business in a few months
At the same time they're buying huge amounts of land in and around the Reading area.
Prudential Estate Agents?
Cheers
RTID
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests