Shane Long

1472 posts
Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20782
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Shane Long

by Snowball » 26 Jan 2009 19:14

What I'm doing is perfectly reasonable. I am basing my opinions on educated observations.


How come that some listers, using the same process can say Harpur is crap?
How come that some listers, using the same process can say Harpur is vital, the man who makes the team play?

How come that some listers, using the same process can say S Hunt is crap, especially in open play?
How come that some listers, using the same process can say S Hunt is the club's most important player and vital to our success?



Basing my opinions on having seen every home game plus away to Cardiff, Wolves and Brum,
and having watched highlights of other games etc on the site, and using my twenty years as a
player, and using my 5 years managing adults and God knows how many for kids, MY educated
observations are that Kebe is vastly under-rated and is more of a match-winner than Hunt.

The point is, these are just opinions, educated or not.
The difference is I produce actual evidence to support my case, you merely repeat your opinions.

Last season, all around me in the stand all I heard was that Bikey was total crap, a joke.

Now he's a very important player.

User avatar
Son of Len
Member
Posts: 180
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 05:54
Location: NE of Reading, PA

Re: Shane Long

by Son of Len » 26 Jan 2009 19:17

loyalroyal4life Personally i wish we could swap LONG FOR COX!!

Bolton keen on Cox
Megson eyes Swindon raid for striker
Last updated: 24th January 2009

Skysports.com understands Bolton Wanderers are the latest club to have made an offer for 17-goal Swindon striker Simon Cox.

Huddersfield Town last week had a £500,000 bid rejected for the former Reading player, whilst Spurs, Fulham, Sheffield United and Barnsley are all thought to be considering a move for the 21-year-old.

Swindon Town manager Danny Wilson stated this month that while he is not looking to sell Cox, every player has a price. The Swindon board are thought to value the club's top scorer at £1million.

The League One hotshot, meanwhile, has rejected a contract extension at the County Ground.

A spokesperson for Touchline Soccer, who represent Cox, said: "Simon has 18 months remaining on his current deal so there is no urgency to extend his contract. He wants to concentrate on continuing to play well and adding to his impressive goal tally. Let's reassess the situation at the end of the season, and we'll go from there."

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11661_4841394,00.html

I would rather swap Mooney for Cox. Then we could play the Long-Cox pair in ressies.



Okay. I'm sure that's old...

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: Shane Long

by Platypuss » 26 Jan 2009 19:50

Woodcote Royal God knows what that says about the chances of others on this thread carry out the most basic arithmetic without the use of a calculator.


And that was after the edit. :lol:

West Stand Man
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3111
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: Working my nuts off during early retirement

Re: Shane Long

by West Stand Man » 27 Jan 2009 10:06

Platypuss
Woodcote Royal God knows what that says about the chances of others on this thread carry out the most basic arithmetic without the use of a calculator.


And that was after the edit. :lol:

#

Scary isn't it.

User avatar
Huntley & Palmer
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 4424
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:02
Location: Back by dope demand

Re: Shane Long

by Huntley & Palmer » 27 Jan 2009 10:25

Snowball What I'm doing is perfectly reasonable. I am basing my opinions on educated observations.


How come that some listers, using the same process can say Harpur is crap?
How come that some listers, using the same process can say Harpur is vital, the man who makes the team play?

How come that some listers, using the same process can say S Hunt is crap, especially in open play?
How come that some listers, using the same process can say S Hunt is the club's most important player and vital to our success?



Basing my opinions on having seen every home game plus away to Cardiff, Wolves and Brum,
and having watched highlights of other games etc on the site, and using my twenty years as a
player, and using my 5 years managing adults and God knows how many for kids, MY educated
observations are that Kebe is vastly under-rated and is more of a match-winner than Hunt.

The point is, these are just opinions, educated or not.
The difference is I produce actual evidence to support my case, you merely repeat your opinions.

Last season, all around me in the stand all I heard was that Bikey was total crap, a joke.

Now he's a very important player.

Just a general LOL at this poster and his short life on this board. Classic comedy gold


Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20782
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Shane Long

by Snowball » 27 Jan 2009 10:28

An insult from a fool is a compliment.

PlasticRoyale
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1409
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 00:01
Location: Y25

Re: Shane Long

by PlasticRoyale » 27 Jan 2009 10:33

What's your other username Snowball? You seem to be able to hit all the right buttons when it comes to winding HNA? users up.

You're either guenuine (then fair pLOLay) or the Captain Birdseye of fishing


Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20782
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: Shane Long

by Snowball » 27 Jan 2009 10:38

What's your other username Snowball? You seem to be able to hit all the right buttons when it comes to winding HNA? users up.


Well that's not hard.

All you have to do is be accurate and logical
and 99% of football fans will go ballistic.

PlasticRoyale
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1409
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 00:01
Location: Y25

Re: Shane Long

by PlasticRoyale » 27 Jan 2009 10:45

Snowball What's your other username Snowball? You seem to be able to hit all the right buttons when it comes to winding HNA? users up.


Well that's not hard.

All you have to do is be accurate and logical
and 99% of football fans will go ballistic.


Fair enough! I usually avoid the team board because of these types of arguments. Far too much football chat on these boards


Woodcote Royal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 3490
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:24
Location: Relocation to Surrey completed

Re: Shane Long

by Woodcote Royal » 27 Jan 2009 10:47

West Stand Man
Platypuss
Woodcote Royal God knows what that says about the chances of others on this thread carry out the most basic arithmetic without the use of a calculator.


And that was after the edit. :lol:

#

Scary isn't it.


Sure is.

If this response was deemed worth the bandwidth (and from a mod at that :| ) I rest my case.

Woodcote Royal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 3490
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:24
Location: Relocation to Surrey completed

Re: Shane Long

by Woodcote Royal » 27 Jan 2009 11:00

Huntley & Palmer
Snowball What I'm doing is perfectly reasonable. I am basing my opinions on educated observations.


How come that some listers, using the same process can say Harpur is crap?
How come that some listers, using the same process can say Harpur is vital, the man who makes the team play?

How come that some listers, using the same process can say S Hunt is crap, especially in open play?
How come that some listers, using the same process can say S Hunt is the club's most important player and vital to our success?



Basing my opinions on having seen every home game plus away to Cardiff, Wolves and Brum,
and having watched highlights of other games etc on the site, and using my twenty years as a
player, and using my 5 years managing adults and God knows how many for kids, MY educated
observations are that Kebe is vastly under-rated and is more of a match-winner than Hunt.

The point is, these are just opinions, educated or not.
The difference is I produce actual evidence to support my case, you merely repeat your opinions.

Last season, all around me in the stand all I heard was that Bikey was total crap, a joke.

Now he's a very important player.


Just a general LOL at this poster and his short life on this board. Classic comedy gold


Having delivered more cold hard facts in just a few days than many on here could produce in a life time, the need for those who prefer to moderate the kind of bilge that has driven many away to undermine such a contributor, was, sadly, all too predictable.

User avatar
Huntley & Palmer
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 4424
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:02
Location: Back by dope demand

Re: Shane Long

by Huntley & Palmer » 27 Jan 2009 11:07

Snowball An insult from a fool is a compliment.

It was a compliment, you truly are my new favourite poster

User avatar
Huntley & Palmer
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 4424
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:02
Location: Back by dope demand

Re: Shane Long

by Huntley & Palmer » 27 Jan 2009 11:08

Woodcote Royal Having delivered more cold hard facts in just a few days than many on here could produce in a life time, the need for those who prefer to moderate the kind of bilge that has driven many away to undermine such a contributor, was, sadly, all too predictable.


How is Sidwell doing?


User avatar
The 17 Bus
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3154
Joined: 24 May 2006 21:08

Re: Shane Long

by The 17 Bus » 27 Jan 2009 11:10

Huntley & Palmer
Woodcote Royal Having delivered more cold hard facts in just a few days than many on here could produce in a life time, the need for those who prefer to moderate the kind of bilge that has driven many away to undermine such a contributor, was, sadly, all too predictable.


How is Sidwell doing?
season was with a top 2 club.

Not so well, only 4th this season, last

User avatar
heathrow royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3110
Joined: 18 Jan 2008 21:41
Location: As seen on Soccer AM and somewhere between Heathrow and Southampton airport!!!

Re: Shane Long

by heathrow royal » 27 Jan 2009 11:11

Snowball What I'm doing is perfectly reasonable. I am basing my opinions on educated observations.


How come that some listers, using the same process can say Harpur is crap?
How come that some listers, using the same process can say Harpur is vital, the man who makes the team play?



Who the hell is Harpur??????

User avatar
SpaceCruiser
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 5590
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 14:17
Location: Desperately seeking to return home

Re: Shane Long

by SpaceCruiser » 27 Jan 2009 11:16

Snowball How come that some listers, using the same process can say Harpur is crap?


Who is Harpur? :|

I've by-passed all the crap on this thread, I can't be bothered to read your long stats filled posts. But looking at the past two pages, are you now arguing that Long is a better player than Noel Hunt? :shock:

When I first saw Hunt play in the league cup against Luton, I was very impressed by him and thought he should start alongside Doyle in the league. I was proven right.

User avatar
Vision
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5207
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 20:53

Re: Shane Long

by Vision » 27 Jan 2009 11:16

Shane Long scored in his last league start for us.

Neither Doyle , Lita or Hunt did. Therefore quite clearly Long should start the next game. The stats demand it.

Woodcote Royal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 3490
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:24
Location: Relocation to Surrey completed

Re: Shane Long

by Woodcote Royal » 27 Jan 2009 11:22

Huntley & Palmer
Woodcote Royal Having delivered more cold hard facts in just a few days than many on here could produce in a life time, the need for those who prefer to moderate the kind of bilge that has driven many away to undermine such a contributor, was, sadly, all too predictable.


How is Sidwell doing?


I've already said elsewhere that Sidwell is doing well this season but am at a loss to understand why a mod would wish to undermine a thread on a completely different topic unless, of course, the truth really hurts that much.

Whatever you think of Snowball's views, unlike most he's backed them up time and again with hard facts and if that earns him little but ridicule from those who are supposed to run this forum, there really is nothing left to say.
Last edited by Woodcote Royal on 27 Jan 2009 11:27, edited 1 time in total.

S09Royal
Member
Posts: 535
Joined: 29 Sep 2008 19:01

Re: Shane Long

by S09Royal » 27 Jan 2009 11:25

heathrow royal
Snowball What I'm doing is perfectly reasonable. I am basing my opinions on educated observations.


How come that some listers, using the same process can say Harpur is crap?
How come that some listers, using the same process can say Harpur is vital, the man who makes the team play?



Who the hell is Harpur??????


Harpurrr is a cat :roll:

CMRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2011
Joined: 18 Aug 2007 19:18

Re: Shane Long

by CMRoyal » 27 Jan 2009 11:28

Snowball What's your other username Snowball? You seem to be able to hit all the right buttons when it comes to winding HNA? users up.


Well that's not hard.

All you have to do is be accurate and logical
and 99% of football fans will go ballistic.


Are you sure it's 99%? Where's the evidence?

The problem with stats and logic is that they only tell you so much. There are so many variables to upset cold hard logic, eg A Leftwinger may have 56% completed passes compared to A Rightwinger's 52%. But what if A Leftwinger had an international-class B Leftback to pass to, compared to a revolving series of inadequate players filling the right-back position?

OK, that doesn't apply to Reading, but we know that things aren't entirely symmetrical - Rosenior/Kebe seems a more fluent partnership than Hunt/Armstrong, but how do stats show how much of that can be attributed to the individual players? Also, when Harps/Cisse play together, the accent seems to me to be more towards feeding the left-wing than the right. How much is that down to Hunt (who then gets more chance to cross/pass/shoot) and how much is it down to Harper being left-footed, or the runs the front players make, or the way the opposition sets itself out (maybe they pay more respect to an established ex-Premiership player)?

So, please excuse some of us for being sceptical if you state an opinion and then produce a series of statistics that you allege "prove" your case. You can buttress an argument with stats up to a point, but numbers don't line opinions with a copper bottom, all they can do is illustrate your point. This "I am right, I have the numbers to prove it" actuarial approach is bound to wind people up because we know the game is far more nuanced, intricate and random than that. And thank goodness it is, else it would be extremely boring!

1472 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ayjaydee, Bing [Bot], Four Of Clubs, tidus_mi2 and 382 guests

It is currently 19 Jul 2025 21:22