Shane Long

1472 posts
User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: Shane Long

by brendywendy » 22 Apr 2009 15:00

What you said wasn't that they were all individually capable of scoring them but that they could all do it in the same season playing for us......was a load of rubbish


he said could, not would


doyle nearly 20, nhunt close, would have got there by now barring injury, still could
& long could be close if he gets a couple of hatricks in the lasttwo games to send us up! :D :) :lol:

User avatar
Archie's penalty
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5772
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 19:35
Location: Process not oucome

Re: Shane Long

by Archie's penalty » 22 Apr 2009 15:00

Hoop Blah ...also, great to see Snowball back to update a stat in support of one of his claims after a bit of a break from the board when everything else he came up with was shown to be as reliable as a flying Malian winger!


Who set up the first goal yesterday with a great cross! :wink:

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: Shane Long

by brendywendy » 22 Apr 2009 15:02

how manys that this season?


not bad for a pub player

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Shane Long

by Hoop Blah » 22 Apr 2009 15:14

Archie's penalty
Hoop Blah ...also, great to see Snowball back to update a stat in support of one of his claims after a bit of a break from the board when everything else he came up with was shown to be as reliable as a flying Malian winger!


Who set up the first goal yesterday with a great cross! :wink:


You seem to have overlooked the key word reliable.

Yes Kebe has created a number of our goals this season and been quite effective at times. Unfortunately at other times he's been absolutely shocking and if Snowball had a stat on Kebe's f*ck up to decent ball ration I'm sure it would be a little on the poor side.

If he were reliable his crossing and general play wouldn't be quite so inconsistent.

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Shane Long

by Hoop Blah » 22 Apr 2009 15:18

brendywendy
What you said wasn't that they were all individually capable of scoring them but that they could all do it in the same season playing for us......was a load of rubbish


he said could, not would


doyle nearly 20, nhunt close, would have got there by now barring injury, still could
& long could be close if he gets a couple of hatricks in the lasttwo games to send us up! :D :) :lol:


This was in relation to last season not this and the discussion was about the likelihood of it happening.

From memory I think the top four, with all their attacking talents and success (in fact anyone in recent top flight memory), had all failed to achieve what was being suggested it was quite bizarre suggestion that we'd succeed where everyone else had failed.


Sun Tzu
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3996
Joined: 08 Oct 2008 10:00

Re: Shane Long

by Sun Tzu » 22 Apr 2009 15:22

I'm sure they would have tried harder if they new it was so important !

There is no reason on earth why a team can't share it's goals around. If 2 strikers can get 60 goals then 4 can get 60. Number of games makes no odds as it's constant however many players you have.

User avatar
SteveRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2441
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 17:48

Re: Shane Long

by SteveRoyal » 22 Apr 2009 15:35

Sounds like he played well (again) last night.
Maybe he's a late bloomer (in terms of footballing ability).

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: Shane Long

by brendywendy » 22 Apr 2009 15:37

i think hes actually getting there!

Sarah Star
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3186
Joined: 18 Feb 2008 12:29

Re: Shane Long

by Sarah Star » 22 Apr 2009 15:52

Let's keep him.


User avatar
SteveRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2441
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 17:48

Re: Shane Long

by SteveRoyal » 22 Apr 2009 16:20

Sarah Star Let's keep him.

Yes, let's.
It will be funny to look back at this thread in a year or so's time and laugh at all the nutjobs who slagged him off.

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Shane Long

by Hoop Blah » 22 Apr 2009 16:40

Sun Tzu I'm sure they would have tried harder if they new it was so important !

There is no reason on earth why a team can't share it's goals around. If 2 strikers can get 60 goals then 4 can get 60. Number of games makes no odds as it's constant however many players you have.


There's no reason why a man can't run 100 meters in under 5 seconds but it doesn't mean it's likely happen!!!

The whole team didn't score 60 goals the season before so how you think just the front two/4 are likely to chip in with that many is beyond me.

To be fair, I think the arguement was how many would get into double figures for league goals (you thought it was probable that we'd get all three forwards achieving it). It was still massively unlikely to happen because it just doesn't happen. Not enough goals are scored for it to happen, especially for a team like Reading.

As it happens, United actually got 3 players into double figures last season (Ronaldo 31, Tevez 14 and Rooney 12). It think that's just about the first time they've managed during the Premiership!

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: Shane Long

by brendywendy » 22 Apr 2009 17:43

There's no reason why a man can't run 100 meters in under 5 seconds



yes there is



multiple reasons

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Shane Long

by Hoop Blah » 22 Apr 2009 17:47

Go on then....give us a few.

I'm sure they said the same about going sub-10 seconds and the 4 minute mile!

It just means they have to run much much faster than any humman has run before!


Sun Tzu
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3996
Joined: 08 Oct 2008 10:00

Re: Shane Long

by Sun Tzu » 22 Apr 2009 18:14

I'm not sure why this is kicking off again

4 players all with the potential to get a certain number of goals.

Not a hard concept ?

But bizarre to be exercising people this far down the line !!!

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Shane Long

by Ian Royal » 22 Apr 2009 18:26

Sun Tzu I'm not sure why this is kicking off again

4 players all with the potential to get a certain number of goals.

Not a hard concept ?

But bizarre to be exercising people this far down the line !!!


Ignoring that I'd argue Long is capable of breaking 15, I could accept each are individually capable of breaching 15. But there is no way 4 strikers would achieve that at the same club, in the same season. Even in below the Premier League that would require 4 strikers averaging better than a goal every 2 games.

46 games + say 6 cup games to be generous, 2 strikers start each game, so that's 26 games each. 15 goals in 26 starts and x sub appearances.

Relatively few individual strikers manage that sort of strike rate!

Sun Tzu
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3996
Joined: 08 Oct 2008 10:00

Re: Shane Long

by Sun Tzu » 22 Apr 2009 18:31

Ian Royal
Sun Tzu I'm not sure why this is kicking off again

4 players all with the potential to get a certain number of goals.

Not a hard concept ?

But bizarre to be exercising people this far down the line !!!


Ignoring that I'd argue Long is capable of breaking 15, I could accept each are individually capable of breaching 15. But there is no way 4 strikers would achieve that at the same club, in the same season. Even in below the Premier League that would require 4 strikers averaging better than a goal every 2 games.

46 games + say 6 cup games to be generous, 2 strikers start each game, so that's 26 games each. 15 goals in 26 starts and x sub appearances.

Relatively few individual strikers manage that sort of strike rate!


If 2 strikers can get 60 why can't 4 get 15 each ?

The maths is the same.

If Ronaldo, Torres, Rooney and Gerrard played for us they would get 15 each.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Shane Long

by Ian Royal » 22 Apr 2009 18:34

05/06
- 111 goals - 54 games

Kitson 22
Doyle 19
Lita 15
Sidwell 10


About as close as you're ever likely to get, certainly at Reading.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Shane Long

by Ian Royal » 22 Apr 2009 18:37

Sun Tzu
Ian Royal
Sun Tzu I'm not sure why this is kicking off again

4 players all with the potential to get a certain number of goals.

Not a hard concept ?

But bizarre to be exercising people this far down the line !!!


Ignoring that I'd argue Long is capable of breaking 15, I could accept each are individually capable of breaching 15. But there is no way 4 strikers would achieve that at the same club, in the same season. Even in below the Premier League that would require 4 strikers averaging better than a goal every 2 games.

46 games + say 6 cup games to be generous, 2 strikers start each game, so that's 26 games each. 15 goals in 26 starts and x sub appearances.

Relatively few individual strikers manage that sort of strike rate!


If 2 strikers can get 60 why can't 4 get 15 each ?

The maths is the same.

If Ronaldo, Torres, Rooney and Gerrard played for us they would get 15 each.


Because it requires 4 strikers with unbelievably prolific strike rates rather than 2.

It's just bollocks.

Firstly you have no idea how well those players would combine and secondly they'd be playing at a level massively below their quality. There is no way combining those 4 players in the Premier League would see those scores.

papereyes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6027
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 18:41
Location: “The mother of idiots is always pregnant”- Italian proverb

Re: Shane Long

by papereyes » 22 Apr 2009 18:40

LOL!

Sun Tzu
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3996
Joined: 08 Oct 2008 10:00

Re: Shane Long

by Sun Tzu » 22 Apr 2009 18:41

Ian Royal
Firstly you have no idea how well those players would combine and secondly they'd be playing at a level massively below their quality. There is no way combining those 4 players in the Premier League would see those scores.


We aren't in the Premier League though....

And the whole point of the discussion was that we potentially had 4 strikers capable of a decent scoring rate.

As has been pointed out, we've pretty nearly achieved it once before.

If a team scores 100 goals in a season it is just as likely that several players each scored plenty as one scored millions.

1472 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Freddy, Mid Sussex Royal and 458 guests

It is currently 20 Jul 2025 11:53