A case for defence

User avatar
(.)Boobies(.)
Member
Posts: 504
Joined: 13 Feb 2009 21:08
Location: North London

Re: A case for defence

by (.)Boobies(.) » 06 Aug 2009 12:33

79Royal Harper also to come back, hopefully in for Tabb.


To come back from... Wolves? Harper shouldn't be here long if rumours are true. Same for Bikey (hopefully).

Glen Little's Nose
Member
Posts: 85
Joined: 04 Oct 2004 22:53
Location: Watching Adam Miller dive nose first into the West Stand!

Re: A case for defence

by Glen Little's Nose » 06 Aug 2009 12:37

I think will Ingi will struggle under BR because his weakness is his distribution.

We will keep the ball much better with Mills, Pearce Cisse or Bikey as Centre Backs.

Rosenior might struggle for the same reason.

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: A case for defence

by ZacNaloen » 06 Aug 2009 12:43

And just as an added thing, I know it was only one half and when we were under the cosh, but NHunt was completely anonymous when he played on the right against Chelsea. HRK was at least 10 times better there.


The best winger paring i've seen this pre-season was Hal on the right and Henry on the left (both on the wrong foot, both cutting in to support the striker).

Kebe quite fairly has the shirt at the moment though, he's had an excellent pre-season himeslf and caused chelsea plenty problems, not sure why Henry was playing centrally when he came on tbh looked a bit of an experiment.

Noel Hunt is a striker, he should have been playing in the position Church was at the end of the game, the fact he wasn't I think shows how far up the pecking order church actually is.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: A case for defence

by Ian Royal » 06 Aug 2009 12:46

ZacNaloen
And just as an added thing, I know it was only one half and when we were under the cosh, but NHunt was completely anonymous when he played on the right against Chelsea. HRK was at least 10 times better there.


The best winger paring i've seen this pre-season was Hal on the right and Henry on the left (both on the wrong foot, both cutting in to support the striker).

Kebe quite fairly has the shirt at the moment though, he's had an excellent pre-season himeslf and caused chelsea plenty problems, not sure why Henry was playing centrally when he came on tbh looked a bit of an experiment.

Noel Hunt is a striker, he should have been playing in the position Church was at the end of the game, the fact he wasn't I think shows how far up the pecking order church actually is.


I don't like Kebe for well documented reasons, but you're certainly right, it is very hard to have anyone down as ahead of him. HRK has really impressed me, but I believe he's left footed so I'd prefer Henry on the right. Then again as you say, cutting in may be more affective than crossing given our formation.

If NHunt is fit and ready he's got to be a cert for the middle, especially given Long's poor showing against Chelsea. Church has to be pushing Long quite hard.

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: A case for defence

by ZacNaloen » 06 Aug 2009 12:49

I think Brendan did a bit of experimenting towards the end of the match, there were a couple of players in weird positions.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 246 guests

It is currently 09 Aug 2025 07:55