by SteveRoyal » 09 Aug 2009 10:25
by sandman » 09 Aug 2009 10:28
SteveRoyalsandman P.S. I thought it was funny hearing the florist lot singing Chelsea rent boys at our fans when their own number 11 is a Royal.
Me and my mate thought they were chanting "Chelsea Minstrels" which didn't make much sense to us.
by FiNeRaIn » 09 Aug 2009 10:38
sandmanSteveRoyalsandman P.S. I thought it was funny hearing the florist lot singing Chelsea rent boys at our fans when their own number 11 is a Royal.
Me and my mate thought they were chanting "Chelsea Minstrels" which didn't make much sense to us.
Well I was in the North Stand so they may well have been chanting that. TBH though I don't speak Northern so find it hard to understand them at the best of times.
by sandman » 09 Aug 2009 10:41
by RoyalBlue » 09 Aug 2009 10:59
sandman Not sure why Rosenior has got so much stick, made one last ditch tackle that saved a goal and I presume that the “hoofs” he’s being criticised for were the two well executed arced passes down the line that set up two of our most dangerous attacks. Pearce was my MOTM, the passing game obviously suits him more than the direct one and Scott Davies also did well.
by ZacNaloen » 09 Aug 2009 11:03
by chilipepper91 » 09 Aug 2009 11:06
LoyalRoyal22My choice would be Davies in the Karacan role, and Matejovsky in the Davies role.
What when Karacan was the best player on the pitch?
by 79Royal » 09 Aug 2009 11:17
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 09 Aug 2009 11:20
SteveRoyalsandman P.S. I thought it was funny hearing the florist lot singing Chelsea rent boys at our fans when their own number 11 is a Royal.
Me and my mate thought they were chanting "Chelsea Minstrels" which didn't make much sense to us.
by Handsome Man » 09 Aug 2009 11:25
Rev Algenon Stickleback HSteveRoyalsandman P.S. I thought it was funny hearing the florist lot singing Chelsea rent boys at our fans when their own number 11 is a Royal.
Me and my mate thought they were chanting "Chelsea Minstrels" which didn't make much sense to us.
making even less sense were their taunts of "your ground's too big for you", considering their average last year was 22000, a full 8000 below capacity.
Still that was beaten by some Reading fans signing "have you ever won the Simod, have you f***"
Yes, it's a tongue in cheek song, but they fact is that Forest have won the Simod Cup, winning it the year after we did.
by The Rouge » 09 Aug 2009 11:26
by sandman » 09 Aug 2009 11:32
RoyalBluesandman Not sure why Rosenior has got so much stick, made one last ditch tackle that saved a goal and I presume that the “hoofs” he’s being criticised for were the two well executed arced passes down the line that set up two of our most dangerous attacks. Pearce was my MOTM, the passing game obviously suits him more than the direct one and Scott Davies also did well.
Didn't you realise? Rosenior was landslide winner for the 'Boo Boys Target Man Season 09/10'.
That means that from now on, every single thing that he does less than perfectly will be seized on for boos and criticism, whereas the good points you rightly refer to will be completely ignored.
by URZZZZZZZZ » 09 Aug 2009 11:42
The Rouge Davies was good but Karacan MOTM for me, then Pearce.
by winchester_royal » 09 Aug 2009 11:47
Sir Dodger Royal Glad to see that most people agree with SDR apart from the RTGs who need to replace their lenses. Where is Hampshire Royal?
Has he yet been blessed by Brenda (do as I'm told) Dodger?
by The Rouge » 09 Aug 2009 11:57
by Ian Royal » 09 Aug 2009 12:24
The Rouge Davies was good but Karacan MOTM for me, then Pearce.
by Ian Royal » 09 Aug 2009 12:34
Royal RotherIan Royal Overall a decent showing. We kept the ball well and showed a lot of intelligence in our play. We looked very solid at the back and on the whole controlled the game.
then later on...Ian Royal today was as dull a game as I've seen in years.
Bizarre.
by Ian Royal » 09 Aug 2009 12:41
sandmanRoyalBluesandman Not sure why Rosenior has got so much stick, made one last ditch tackle that saved a goal and I presume that the “hoofs” he’s being criticised for were the two well executed arced passes down the line that set up two of our most dangerous attacks. Pearce was my MOTM, the passing game obviously suits him more than the direct one and Scott Davies also did well.
Didn't you realise? Rosenior was landslide winner for the 'Boo Boys Target Man Season 09/10'.
That means that from now on, every single thing that he does less than perfectly will be seized on for boos and criticism, whereas the good points you rightly refer to will be completely ignored.
As long as he is playing for my team I'll be sticking up for him. He's got weaknesses and he wasn't the best player on the pitch yesterday but if he does something right he at least deserves recognition for it.
by FiNeRaIn » 09 Aug 2009 12:52
winchester_royalSir Dodger Royal Glad to see that most people agree with SDR apart from the RTGs who need to replace their lenses. Where is Hampshire Royal?
Has he yet been blessed by Brenda (do as I'm told) Dodger?
I think your the one who needs his lenses replacing Dodger (christ, i'm thick) Royal.
by daswonder » 09 Aug 2009 12:56
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 298 guests