by Sarah Star » 19 Oct 2009 14:31
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 19 Oct 2009 14:34
zummerset wrote:
Some posters want to give BR until EASTER!!!!
Thaumagurist wrote: Christmas.
by Y25 » 19 Oct 2009 14:41
by zummerset » 19 Oct 2009 14:46
by Ian Royal » 19 Oct 2009 17:57
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 19 Oct 2009 19:02
by surrounded by saints » 19 Oct 2009 19:10
zummerset I agree its the clueless response that indicates that BR may be a wrong un (at least for us) and the wrong type of manager for us. What about rescuing Ollie from the Pool?
by PEARCEY » 19 Oct 2009 19:19
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe Seriously if I was the chairman of any football team in trouble and on the look for a short term fix, Dog would be pretty high on most lists. He's just too much and after time falls out with everyone.
I do remember the negativity towards Pards, what was is, The Nearly Man?
Personally I believed in the guy. I've listened too and watched Rodgers and just don't believe him. We had faith in Pards cause we thought he was a great manager, Rodger's is the only one who thinks he is a great manager....
by andrew1957 » 19 Oct 2009 19:24
by PEARCEY » 19 Oct 2009 19:26
by andrew1957 » 19 Oct 2009 19:30
PEARCEY Why deluded? Curbs has worked on a shoe-string at Charlton in the past. The clubs not a million mailes away from where he lives, he's been out of work for a while etc etc...
by PEARCEY » 19 Oct 2009 19:35
andrew1957PEARCEY Why deluded? Curbs has worked on a shoe-string at Charlton in the past. The clubs not a million mailes away from where he lives, he's been out of work for a while etc etc...
Hi Pearcey
I actually posted that before reading your comments so it was not aimed specifically at you.
But if he came here he would have no funds and be on to a hiding to nothing. It would be an incredibly high risk job to take for any established manager. I would be astounded if he took the risk at this time in his career - unless he really wants a challenge!
IMO the only hope of getting him would be if new owners took over the club and he had lots of cash to splash in January.
by Armadillo Roadkill » 19 Oct 2009 19:48
by Millsy » 19 Oct 2009 19:52
Jerry St Clair In honour of 2 world wars, 1 world cup's classic 2001 thread which (correct me if I'm wrong) cocked a snook at the plethora of Pardew detractors on HNA? who'd wanted him gone within months of joining in 1999. Pardew took on a squad that had been ground into the dust during the TB1 and TB2 eras, and it took him the best part of two seasons to rebuild it.
by PEARCEY » 19 Oct 2009 19:57
by Archie's penalty » 19 Oct 2009 20:07
by strap » 19 Oct 2009 20:12
by andrew1957 » 19 Oct 2009 20:28
by Man Friday » 19 Oct 2009 20:34
by Millsy » 19 Oct 2009 21:30
strap For the Rodgers lovers out there, I will try to explain things very simply.
When FSB, Judas and SSC took over RFC, yes, they had plenty of issues to resolve. The point is, it was easy to see, almost from the off, what each of those managers was trying to achieve, and more importantly how they were going about things. All 3 managers very quickly achieved significant successes.
In the case of Rodgers, Burns and Bulilvant, they too may or may not have taken over an RFC team that had issues, but they showed absolutely no idea of how they were going to mould and shape the team into something coherent. All three chopped and changed personnel, tactics and gave very good impressions of simply blindly trying anything in teh forelorn hope of hitting on some magical winning formaula. All 3 failed miserably.
THAT is why Rodgers is a failure. There is no coherent plan. Oh, and he's so full of bullshit that he'd make Campbell and Meddlesome blush.
Users browsing this forum: cornflake, Hove Royal and 267 guests