by readingbedding » 03 Nov 2009 15:38
by Royal Lady » 03 Nov 2009 15:41
by brendywendy » 03 Nov 2009 15:42
by Sun Tzu » 03 Nov 2009 15:50
Royal Lady Do you know what, you're all right - all of you. I'm wrong. I'm just a silly old woman with her own opinions. You go pat each other on the back when we're mid table and higher in a few weeks. Well done. Truly.
by rhroyal » 03 Nov 2009 15:56
brendywendy youre not that old RL
what are you 40?
by readingbedding » 03 Nov 2009 15:56
by brendywendy » 03 Nov 2009 15:57
by Royalee » 03 Nov 2009 15:58
by Gordons Cumming » 03 Nov 2009 16:04
rhroyalbrendywendy youre not that old RL
what are you 40?
However old she is, she acts like a little kid when people disagree with her. What's the point of a messageboard if you can't debate?
by Super Kevin Bremner! » 03 Nov 2009 16:12
by readingbedding » 03 Nov 2009 16:20
by Super Kevin Bremner! » 03 Nov 2009 16:22
by Royal Lady » 03 Nov 2009 16:58
rhroyalbrendywendy youre not that old RL
what are you 40?
However old she is, she acts like a little kid when people disagree with her. What's the point of a messageboard if you can't debate?
by readingbedding » 03 Nov 2009 17:02
by Hoop Blah » 03 Nov 2009 17:12
by willz_royal » 03 Nov 2009 17:14
by Royal Lady » 03 Nov 2009 17:26
Hmm, maybe I haven't made myself clear in the past, I knew that Coppell would be wrong for us this season - it doesn't stop me wishing he was still here, but I'm under no illusions that he SHOULD be here. I haven't been impressed with Rodgers, and yes I have been vocal about it, to counteract the likes of Royalee who was pontificating the other side! I just failed to see why this thread had to be for my attention solely - it's much better now he's changed it - it encompasses more than just myself. I sincerely hope I'm proved wrong with my thoughts on Rodgers and the team - I really do - we all want the same thing at heart and that's our club to do well and not suffer monetarily or on the pitch. It's the idiots who jump on bandwagons just to have a go at the likes of me and Ideal that I object to and this thread was only going to help their cause. Little boys of about 12 who can only post emoticons, however, aren't worth fussing over.Hoop Blah RL, you, Ideal and Ian Royal are three that I've noticed being most vocal in their displeasure with Rodgers over the last month or so.
You seemed particularily keen to jump on him because he wasn't Steve Coppell and, the impression I got, was that you were going to hold that against him to somehow show your loyalty to Coppell or prove that we should've kept him on after last season.
I know there were plenty of others who also gave Rodgers plenty of stick, and I can understand why, but as more regular posters and, for want of a better term, 'higher profile nobbers' you have to accept that if you're going to dish it out some of it's going to come back your way at some point.
You do seem to throw more of a hissy fit than others when your opinions are challenged...maybe that has something to do with why you supposedly get singled out.
by willz_royal » 03 Nov 2009 17:41
Royal Lady Little boys of about 12 who can only post emoticons, however, aren't worth fussing over.
by Gordons Cumming » 03 Nov 2009 17:44
Royal Lady but I'm made out to be some demented old fool
by readingbedding » 03 Nov 2009 17:47
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 285 guests