willz_royalRoyal Lady Little boys of about 12 who can only post emoticons, however, aren't worth fussing over.
by Gordons Cumming » 03 Nov 2009 17:58
willz_royalRoyal Lady Little boys of about 12 who can only post emoticons, however, aren't worth fussing over.
by Royalee » 03 Nov 2009 18:01
Royal LadyHmm, maybe I haven't made myself clear in the past, I knew that Coppell would be wrong for us this season - it doesn't stop me wishing he was still here, but I'm under no illusions that he SHOULD be here. I haven't been impressed with Rodgers, and yes I have been vocal about it, to counteract the likes of Royalee who was pontificating the other side! I just failed to see why this thread had to be for my attention solely - it's much better now he's changed it - it encompasses more than just myself. I sincerely hope I'm proved wrong with my thoughts on Rodgers and the team - I really do - we all want the same thing at heart and that's our club to do well and not suffer monetarily or on the pitch. It's the idiots who jump on bandwagons just to have a go at the likes of me and Ideal that I object to and this thread was only going to help their cause. Little boys of about 12 who can only post emoticons, however, aren't worth fussing over.Hoop Blah RL, you, Ideal and Ian Royal are three that I've noticed being most vocal in their displeasure with Rodgers over the last month or so.
You seemed particularily keen to jump on him because he wasn't Steve Coppell and, the impression I got, was that you were going to hold that against him to somehow show your loyalty to Coppell or prove that we should've kept him on after last season.
I know there were plenty of others who also gave Rodgers plenty of stick, and I can understand why, but as more regular posters and, for want of a better term, 'higher profile nobbers' you have to accept that if you're going to dish it out some of it's going to come back your way at some point.
You do seem to throw more of a hissy fit than others when your opinions are challenged...maybe that has something to do with why you supposedly get singled out.
by readingbedding » 03 Nov 2009 18:05
by PEARCEY » 03 Nov 2009 18:06
by Gordons Cumming » 03 Nov 2009 18:08
Royalee
What haven't you been impressed with Rodgers ...........................?
by Royalee » 03 Nov 2009 18:09
Gordons CummingRoyalee
What haven't you been impressed with Rodgers ...........................?
2 points off the bottom after 15 games.
Need I say more?
by Ian Royal » 03 Nov 2009 18:12
Royal Lady Aren't people allowed to have opinions now?
by Ian Royal » 03 Nov 2009 18:14
RoyaleeGordons CummingRoyalee
What haven't you been impressed with Rodgers ...........................?
2 points off the bottom after 15 games.
Need I say more?
...And the reasons for the slow start would be? It's all very well saying we're 2 points off the bottom, but what could be done to change it?
by Royal Lady » 03 Nov 2009 18:18
RoyaleeRoyal LadyHmm, maybe I haven't made myself clear in the past, I knew that Coppell would be wrong for us this season - it doesn't stop me wishing he was still here, but I'm under no illusions that he SHOULD be here. I haven't been impressed with Rodgers, and yes I have been vocal about it, to counteract the likes of Royalee who was pontificating the other side! I just failed to see why this thread had to be for my attention solely - it's much better now he's changed it - it encompasses more than just myself. I sincerely hope I'm proved wrong with my thoughts on Rodgers and the team - I really do - we all want the same thing at heart and that's our club to do well and not suffer monetarily or on the pitch. It's the idiots who jump on bandwagons just to have a go at the likes of me and Ideal that I object to and this thread was only going to help their cause. Little boys of about 12 who can only post emoticons, however, aren't worth fussing over.Hoop Blah RL, you, Ideal and Ian Royal are three that I've noticed being most vocal in their displeasure with Rodgers over the last month or so.
You seemed particularily keen to jump on him because he wasn't Steve Coppell and, the impression I got, was that you were going to hold that against him to somehow show your loyalty to Coppell or prove that we should've kept him on after last season.
I know there were plenty of others who also gave Rodgers plenty of stick, and I can understand why, but as more regular posters and, for want of a better term, 'higher profile nobbers' you have to accept that if you're going to dish it out some of it's going to come back your way at some point.
You do seem to throw more of a hissy fit than others when your opinions are challenged...maybe that has something to do with why you supposedly get singled out.
You knew Coppell would be wrong but you still want him here? Make your mind up, which one is it?It would have been wrong for Coppell to stay, imo, because I think we all know that he'd taken us as far as he could and I don't think his heart was in it 100%, even during his last season. But, I sometimes wish he was still here and we were like the team of 2006 - but I don't believe we'll see anything like that for a very long time, if ever again.
What haven't you been impressed with Rodgers and what would you do differently if you were in charge?I haven't been impressed with any of his soundbites in the media, if I were in charge, I'd be a little more humble - far better to play things down and then surprise people with results, than big yourself up and set yourself up for a fall, which, imo, he has done so far. I haven't been impressed with Rodgers handling of the team - trying out loads of different permutations well into the start of the season. If I had been in charge, I would have played who I thought showed the most promise in training and if after a few games, I had new players to choose from or others were showing more promise in training, I'd change a few at a time. I haven't been impressed with his almost steadfast refusal to go 442 and insist on playing one up front - no matter who the opposition were. If I were in charge, I'd adapt the tactics to suit the team we were playing against.
Jumping on bandwagons? Some of us wanted the change to happen 12 months before and are hardly jumping on any bandwagons in doing so - surely if anyone is guilty of that it's Ideal given that he doesn't get to games due to the distance he lives away?I was referring to the bandwagon of knocking certain posters, no matter what their thoughts and how those thoughts were put across. This thread is a prime example I'm afraid. What is Readingbedding bringing to this debate other than to mock? What has Willz Royal brought to the table, other than his usual stupid emoticon, because he's made it perfectly plain in other threads that he doesn't particularly like me? I'm not here to win a popularity contest, I really don't care if people disagree with me, that is what debate is all about - but it seems to me that some people would argue with me and mock me if I said the sky was blue and trees are green, such is their dislike.
If you responded to these questions and made yourself clearer with more credible reasoning used to back up your arguments as opposed to flying off the handle then people might take you more seriously.
by Ian Royal » 03 Nov 2009 18:22
by Royal Lady » 03 Nov 2009 18:32
by PEARCEY » 03 Nov 2009 18:35
Royal Lady I haven't thrown a tantrum! All I can do in this sort of situation is say I'm completely wrong then and everybody else is correct! Which is what I did - but that's wrong too. I don't really know what I can do? There was, imo, no reason at all for SKB to make this thread for my attention other than to mock me. Had I been the only person on here with my views, I could have understood it, but I wasn't.
Seems to me, no-one will be happy unless I either agree with everybody, or I don't make my own feelings on matters known - which is hardly healthy debate is it?!
by Ian Royal » 03 Nov 2009 18:38
Royal Lady I haven't thrown a tantrum! All I can do in this sort of situation is say I'm completely wrong then and everybody else is correct! Which is what I did - but that's wrong too. I don't really know what I can do? There was, imo, no reason at all for SKB to make this thread for my attention other than to mock me. Had I been the only person on here with my views, I could have understood it, but I wasn't.
Seems to me, no-one will be happy unless I either agree with everybody, or I don't make my own feelings on matters known - which is hardly healthy debate is it?!
by zummerset » 03 Nov 2009 18:47
by readingbedding » 03 Nov 2009 19:03
by Millsy » 03 Nov 2009 19:14
by strap » 03 Nov 2009 19:16
Super Kevin Bremner! Jobi Macanuff
Played 7
Assists 2
Goals 1
Gregory Rasiak
Played 5 (+4)
Goals 3
Brian Howard
Played 9 (+1)
Assists 1
Goals 1
Sahun Cummings
No comment
No doubt you'll extract whatever point of view you want from those stats but for what it's worth, considering it's a new team and those players are still 'bedding-in' I would suggest that Rodgers has done very nicely indeed in the transfer market thank you very much.
Rasiak's 3 goals came from his 5 starts. That means pro rata from 46 starts he'd be on for 27 goals. Terrible signing.
HTFH
by Gordons Cumming » 03 Nov 2009 19:17
by Millsy » 03 Nov 2009 19:19
RoyaleeRoyal LadyHmm, maybe I haven't made myself clear in the past, I knew that Coppell would be wrong for us this season - it doesn't stop me wishing he was still here, but I'm under no illusions that he SHOULD be here. I haven't been impressed with Rodgers, and yes I have been vocal about it, to counteract the likes of Royalee who was pontificating the other side! I just failed to see why this thread had to be for my attention solely - it's much better now he's changed it - it encompasses more than just myself. I sincerely hope I'm proved wrong with my thoughts on Rodgers and the team - I really do - we all want the same thing at heart and that's our club to do well and not suffer monetarily or on the pitch. It's the idiots who jump on bandwagons just to have a go at the likes of me and Ideal that I object to and this thread was only going to help their cause. Little boys of about 12 who can only post emoticons, however, aren't worth fussing over.Hoop Blah RL, you, Ideal and Ian Royal are three that I've noticed being most vocal in their displeasure with Rodgers over the last month or so.
You seemed particularily keen to jump on him because he wasn't Steve Coppell and, the impression I got, was that you were going to hold that against him to somehow show your loyalty to Coppell or prove that we should've kept him on after last season.
I know there were plenty of others who also gave Rodgers plenty of stick, and I can understand why, but as more regular posters and, for want of a better term, 'higher profile nobbers' you have to accept that if you're going to dish it out some of it's going to come back your way at some point.
You do seem to throw more of a hissy fit than others when your opinions are challenged...maybe that has something to do with why you supposedly get singled out.
You knew Coppell would be wrong but you still want him here? Make your mind up, which one is it?
What haven't you been impressed with Rodgers and what would you do differently if you were in charge?
Jumping on bandwagons? Some of us wanted the change to happen 12 months before and are hardly jumping on any bandwagons in doing so - surely if anyone is guilty of that it's Ideal given that he doesn't get to games due to the distance he lives away?
If you responded to these questions and made yourself clearer with more credible reasoning used to back up your arguments as opposed to flying off the handle then people might take you more seriously.
by Super Kevin Bremner! » 03 Nov 2009 19:21
Royal Lady I haven't thrown a tantrum! All I can do in this sort of situation is say I'm completely wrong then and everybody else is correct! Which is what I did - but that's wrong too. I don't really know what I can do? There was, imo, no reason at all for SKB to make this thread for my attention other than to mock me. Had I been the only person on here with my views, I could have understood it, but I wasn't.
Seems to me, no-one will be happy unless I either agree with everybody, or I don't make my own feelings on matters known - which is hardly healthy debate is it?!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Rax, Royal Ginger and 230 guests