by Sun Tzu » 07 Dec 2009 21:58
by Terminal Boardom » 07 Dec 2009 22:13
by RoyalBlue » 07 Dec 2009 22:41
Sun Tzu If you pick Kitson at his best then he's clearly better than Rasiak.
The Kitson we had on loan last season was not a better player than the Rasiak we have now.
I'd take a forward who scores goals over one who didn't, given the option !
And if we never have the budget to pay for players how did we manage to get Rasiak (who seems to be in decent goal scoring form ) and MAcAnuff, who seems to be setting the goals up ?
I always find RoyalBlue good for a laugh, even if he's posts often appear to have been placed on the wrong club's board due to some glitch in hyperspace. I suspect he's really an Orient fan or something and has misfiled a link in his Favourites
by tink » 08 Dec 2009 00:40
RoyalBlue Of course we have a budget but the one your hero has set is completely unrealistic for success and possibly even survival at this level. Just look at the quality of players we have let go, compared with those that now populate our squad. And, guess what, the clubs they went to are doing far better than ours.
by papereyes » 08 Dec 2009 11:07
by papereyes » 08 Dec 2009 11:09
by friday fan » 08 Dec 2009 12:07
by Wycombe Royal » 08 Dec 2009 12:21
by Royalee » 08 Dec 2009 12:23
Wycombe Royal If you look at the players that go to the A League from here it shows that the level isn't that great. THese players will not be up to the required standard of the Championship and it will take them a while to get used to it. Loan deals don't provide that time, you need players whocan come in and just get on with it.
Thorvaldsson has been around a bit and has played football in a few countries so this will not be an issue for him.
by Sun Tzu » 08 Dec 2009 12:31
RoyalBlueSun Tzu If you pick Kitson at his best then he's clearly better than Rasiak.
The Kitson we had on loan last season was not a better player than the Rasiak we have now.
I'd take a forward who scores goals over one who didn't, given the option !
And if we never have the budget to pay for players how did we manage to get Rasiak (who seems to be in decent goal scoring form ) and MAcAnuff, who seems to be setting the goals up ?
I always find RoyalBlue good for a laugh, even if he's posts often appear to have been placed on the wrong club's board due to some glitch in hyperspace. I suspect he's really an Orient fan or something and has misfiled a link in his Favourites
Better good for a laugh than a complete joke!
Of course we have a budget but the one your hero has set is completely unrealistic for success and possibly even survival at this level. Just look at the quality of players we have let go, compared with those that now populate our squad. And, guess what, the clubs they went to are doing far better than ours.
Hopefully when Madejski finally realises that he can't have his cake (fame and adulation) and eat it (retrieve the money he spent in getting the former) and pisses off, you will still be firmly stuck up his backside and unable to escape in time.
As for misfiled links - shouldn't yours be directing you to Madejski's facebook?
by Ian Royal » 08 Dec 2009 13:07
papereyes I just looked up Rasiak's stats for us.
Currently on 5 goals in 7 starts, 6 subs appearances. That ain't bad. First few games, yes, he didn't score so what's more reassuring is that now he's got his oar in, it seems to be a scoring on a regular basis.
If Church can get to double figures, or a proportional tally (if injured, for example), then that's a good return from the youngster.
It's just that a decent strike force needs 3 or 4 goal threats. We currently seem to have 1, plus a raw Church then Long (FAT), Hunt (dead), Mooney (bobbins).
If we talking about options, having, say, Mooney and not using him makes him an irrelevence - he's not an option. Having Long but having to put up with him waddling around the pitch like an FFF reservist makes him an irrelevence. They need to contribute.
We need a striker that compliments both Church and Rasiak - someone fast, direct and a bit of a goal-poacher would be my suggestion.
by Broxroyal » 08 Dec 2009 13:18
by papereyes » 08 Dec 2009 13:26
by floyd__streete » 26 Dec 2009 18:54
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 26 Dec 2009 20:15
by Royalee » 26 Dec 2009 20:17
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe Really disapointed with LOng who I thought had his best game is ages at BRistol.
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 26 Dec 2009 20:22
RoyaleeSmoking Kills Dancing Doe Really disapointed with LOng who I thought had his best game is ages at BRistol.
Which bit stood out for you at Ashton Gate? Where he got caught offside half a dozen times or the sitter he missed where he turned away to oxf*rd his own goal when he was clean through?
by Wimb » 26 Dec 2009 20:24
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 26 Dec 2009 20:28
by Pseud O'Nym » 26 Dec 2009 20:30
Wimb The question is what happened with Long over the summer?
Was he told by BR or maybe even SSC that he should bulk up? has the pressure of being the only 1 of the 4 strikers from the PL era become too much? Has he just got too big for his boots?
As much as he's been slated on here for years the fact is he still managed goals at this level and above. I'm just gutted the lad hasnt kicked on
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 199 guests