Ideal2 world wars, 1 world cup All discussion is pointless.
WE NEED A MANAGER NOW.
Who do you suggest we get? Other than Tisdale there really isn't much on the market.
Tisdale would be better than McDonut.
by Avon Royal » 21 Jan 2010 07:47
Ideal2 world wars, 1 world cup All discussion is pointless.
WE NEED A MANAGER NOW.
Who do you suggest we get? Other than Tisdale there really isn't much on the market.
by Royal Lady » 21 Jan 2010 09:04
by Terminal Boardom » 21 Jan 2010 09:21
Royal Lady Steve Claridge probably angling for the job himself!
by Alan Partridge » 21 Jan 2010 09:59
by Maguire » 21 Jan 2010 10:28
by Wycombe Royal » 21 Jan 2010 11:09
Maguire Rodgers' dismissal was shortsighted to say the least.
by glenroyal » 21 Jan 2010 11:16
Alan Partridge 2 articles Claridge has written on Reading and personally I think he's got it bang on both times. The best 2 candidates for the job have already got new jobs. Reading weren't even interested then in getting either. They have shown their colours by doing absolutely nothing since Rodgers was rightly dismissed. It's McDermott's job till the end of the season, by default now as there is no-one else out there worth taking.
Re-assess the situation at the end of the season.
by Millsy » 21 Jan 2010 11:48
Wycombe RoyalMaguire Rodgers' dismissal was shortsighted to say the least.
Why was it shortsighted? They knew exactly whay they were doing and knew exactly who was going to take the reins hence why Hammond hasn't been asked to compile a shortlist.
Rodgers wasn't working out, results were showing no signs of improvement, he said he needed to bring in more of his type of players (despite bringing in over half a team since he took over) and the view was that things were not going to improve. His team selections were strange, his tactics baffling and his half time team talks seemed to demotivate.
by paultheroyal » 21 Jan 2010 14:05
by Thaumagurist* » 21 Jan 2010 14:11
by BR2 » 21 Jan 2010 14:23
Wycombe RoyalMaguire Rodgers' dismissal was shortsighted to say the least.
Why was it shortsighted? They knew exactly whay they were doing and knew exactly who was going to take the reins hence why Hammond hasn't been asked to compile a shortlist.
Rodgers wasn't working out, results were showing no signs of improvement, he said he needed to bring in more of his type of players (despite bringing in over half a team since he took over) and the view was that things were not going to improve. His team selections were strange, his tactics baffling and his half time team talks seemed to demotivate.
by Snowball » 21 Jan 2010 14:40
by CMRoyal » 21 Jan 2010 14:52
Thaumagurist* HAVE.
by BR2 » 21 Jan 2010 15:13
Snowball Well-run would mean finishing 20th or better this year without getting into debt.
Stay up and this squad is easily mid-table. With Noel Hunt firing on all cylinders
next year we could challenge for the play-offs.
Of course there's a danger of going down, but I DO believe we are better than 3rd bottom
and we have shown great heart under the caretaker (excluding Plymouth!)
by Pseud O'Nym » 21 Jan 2010 19:40
BR2 If however we got a new manager (McD or a.n.other) and signed a few players rather than doing nothing (apparently,but also taking on board Hammond's quotes about not making signings)we,or indeed any club,might get to mid-table.
by West Stand Flash » 21 Jan 2010 19:53
Snowball Well-run would mean finishing 20th or better this year without getting into debt.
Stay up and this squad is easily mid-table. With Noel Hunt firing on all cylinders
next year we could challenge for the play-offs.
Of course there's a danger of going down, but I DO believe we are better than 3rd bottom
and we have shown great heart under the caretaker (excluding Plymouth!)
by Terminal Boardom » 21 Jan 2010 20:04
West Stand FlashSnowball Well-run would mean finishing 20th or better this year without getting into debt.
Stay up and this squad is easily mid-table. With Noel Hunt firing on all cylinders
next year we could challenge for the play-offs.
Of course there's a danger of going down, but I DO believe we are better than 3rd bottom
and we have shown great heart under the caretaker (excluding Plymouth!)
If you think this squad is good enough to challenge for the Play-Offs then I'm sorry you are clearly deluded. We need a lot more than Noel Hunt. How about a solid defence? How about some creativity in the centre of midfield?? How about a striker who does more than 'makes good runs'.
Apart from McAnuff & Siggurdsson, this squad is very poor.
by Snowball » 21 Jan 2010 20:18
by Pseud O'Nym » 21 Jan 2010 20:18
Terminal Boardom I challenge ANYONE to provide REAL evidence to the contrary.
by Terminal Boardom » 21 Jan 2010 20:31
Users browsing this forum: adambs2000, cornflake, Google Adsense [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 185 guests