by papereyes »
16 Jun 2010 12:17
Off of F365 but something along the lines that I've been thinking about the slow start thing
Italy 90. Winners West Germany - They started with a 4-1 win over Yugoslavia (who made it to the quarters) and then thumped UAE 5-1. Not really a slow start that.
USA 94 - Winners Brazil - Opened with a 2-0 victory over Russia and then thrashed the at that time highly rated Cameroon 3-0.
France 98 - Winners France - Won all 3 of their group games with an aggregate score of 9-1. Alright South Afrcia and Saudi Arabia aren't the greatest of competition but Denmark were no mugs.
Japan/Korea 02 - Winners Brazil - Won all 3 group games with an aggregated score of 11-3. Very slow start that. Eventual golden boot winner Ronaldo had 4 by the end of the group stage.
Germany 06 - Winners Italy. Winning 2-0 over both Ghana and the Czech Republic doesn't seem like a slow start to me. Okay drawing 1-1 with USA wasn't great but that was one of those weird games where they had 2 men sent off.
That said - the other argument - that the team that flies fastest out of the traps doesn't tend to win isn't disproved by this.
BUT
2006 had Spain and Argentina racking up big wins but then 2002 saw Germany reach the final after an 8-0 start and Brazil racked up 4 without reply in the group stages. Portugal also won big, but went out at the hands of the States.
1998 saw France win big, twice, in their group stage. Equally, Spain won 6-1 in their last game and lost out to Bulgaria and Nigeria. Other big wins were Argentina battering Jamaica. Losing finalists Brazil won their first two quite comfortably and went through top of their group (was their game to Norway a dead one as far as they were concerned?).
So I'm honestly not sure that any pattern exists, really.