SpaceCruiserroadrunner At least it's different to the all too familiar repetitive plastic bowl.
Er, it's still a bowl.
Does that not mean the seats have to link all the way around the stadium? Because they don't.
by roadrunner » 23 Feb 2011 19:49
SpaceCruiserroadrunner At least it's different to the all too familiar repetitive plastic bowl.
Er, it's still a bowl.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 23 Feb 2011 20:20
FiNeRaInBig Foot Can't see anything there that suggests anything like "real character"
Yep, astonishing comments, looks like more or less every other modern day ground.
by SpaceCruiser » 24 Feb 2011 23:01
roadrunnerSpaceCruiserroadrunner At least it's different to the all too familiar repetitive plastic bowl.
Er, it's still a bowl.
Does that not mean the seats have to link all the way around the stadium? Because they don't.
by paultheroyal » 25 Feb 2011 10:21
by SpaceCruiser » 26 Feb 2011 00:38
paultheroyal Excellent original design, delighted for Brighton, and look forward to visiting there.
by roadrunner » 26 Feb 2011 12:16
SpaceCruiserroadrunner At least it's different to the all too familiar repetitive plastic bowl.
Even if seats don't go around, the corners are still filled in, meaning that it's in an enclosed bowl...
by LWJ » 01 Mar 2011 11:45
SpaceCruiserpaultheroyal Excellent original design, delighted for Brighton, and look forward to visiting there.
I'm sure you'll be comfortable amongst the home fans with your ymca gear.
by Maguire » 01 Mar 2011 12:19
by Badger Finger » 01 Mar 2011 18:25
SpaceCruiserpaultheroyal Excellent original design, delighted for Brighton, and look forward to visiting there.
I'm sure you'll be comfortable amongst the home fans with your ymca gear.
by SouthDownsRoyal » 01 Mar 2011 22:21
by Row Z Royal » 01 Mar 2011 22:25
by Badger Finger » 03 Mar 2011 12:45
by Muskrat » 03 Mar 2011 21:56
by paultheroyal » 03 Mar 2011 23:33
Muskrat I'd be sacking the Architect tbh, looks like they've designed the worst of both worlds. Shallow single tier stands no better than the Withdump's on three sides and a three tier stand where the third tier will probably stay closed for 75% of the games, Great
by exileinleeds » 04 Mar 2011 08:50
by Svlad Cjelli » 04 Mar 2011 09:42
Muskrat I'd be sacking the Architect tbh, looks like they've designed the worst of both worlds. Shallow single tier stands no better than the Withdump's on three sides and a three tier stand where the third tier will probably stay closed for 75% of the games, Great
by Wax Jacket » 04 Mar 2011 09:55
by Svlad Cjelli » 04 Mar 2011 10:35
by roadrunner » 04 Mar 2011 10:59
Svlad CjelliMuskrat I'd be sacking the Architect tbh, looks like they've designed the worst of both worlds. Shallow single tier stands no better than the Withdump's on three sides and a three tier stand where the third tier will probably stay closed for 75% of the games, Great
That design is due to the need to be as inconspicuous as possible - they're in a hollow in an AONB (is it now a national park?) so the stands have to be shallow so as to not dominate the landscape - similarly they can't use the same sort of sticky-up roof supports that we and many others have.
by Wax Jacket » 04 Mar 2011 11:02
roadrunner So Brighton have built a stadium they can't expand later if the demand is there?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests