by brendywendy » 06 May 2011 14:17
by leicsRoyal » 06 May 2011 14:19
Royal Lady Surely if the FA were going to allow the team finishing 7th tomorrow into the play-offs - they'd need to give them a bit more notice? Our tickets go on sale tomorrow - they won't be able to do anything until Monday pm at the earliest, and I can't believe the clubs involved will have been given prior warning, because it would have leaked out by now.
by Archie's penalty » 06 May 2011 14:21
by Royal Lady » 06 May 2011 14:28
I know that unless the FA had enough evidence they wouldn't be having this hearing in the first place. I know what the charges are - and you can't just make up charges for the sake of it.Wycombe RoyalRoyal Lady It will be an abomination if they don't suffer as a result of their blatant cheating and lying.
So you have seen the evidence and know they are guilty then?
by Arch » 06 May 2011 14:31
Royal LadyI know that unless the FA had enough evidence they wouldn't be having this hearing in the first place. I know what the charges are - and you can't just make up charges for the sake of it.Wycombe RoyalRoyal Lady It will be an abomination if they don't suffer as a result of their blatant cheating and lying.
So you have seen the evidence and know they are guilty then?
by Royal Lady » 06 May 2011 14:33
by Wycombe Royal » 06 May 2011 14:41
Royal LadyI know that unless the FA had enough evidence they wouldn't be having this hearing in the first place. I know what the charges are - and you can't just make up charges for the sake of it.Wycombe RoyalRoyal Lady It will be an abomination if they don't suffer as a result of their blatant cheating and lying.
So you have seen the evidence and know they are guilty then?
by Wycombe Royal » 06 May 2011 14:42
Royal Lady It's not a court case about a bloody rapist or anything is it?
The FA would not, imo, bother to go to all the trouble of a hearing - charging QPR with 7 charges, if they didn't believe that they were right. Until the news of this hearing came about, I along with, I suspect, most football fans, would have been none the wiser about what they allegedly did or didn't do.
by Royal Lady » 06 May 2011 14:43
by Wycombe Royal » 06 May 2011 14:46
Royal Lady You can laugh. Let's wait and see what the punishment is shall we? In the meantime, I'm allowed to specul8 as much as the next man, or woman.
by Royal Lady » 06 May 2011 14:49
by Wycombe Royal » 06 May 2011 14:55
by Royal Lady » 06 May 2011 14:56
by brendywendy » 06 May 2011 15:02
by Wycombe Royal » 06 May 2011 15:03
brendywendy im with miss marple on this one
you leave her alone
by RobRoyal » 06 May 2011 16:02
Wycombe Royal So your view is that they are guilty of all 7 charges (5 for QPR and 2 for Paladini) just on the logic that the FA would not have charged them otherwise?
Just because the FA think they are guilty it doesn't mean they actually are and from what I have heard most of their evidence is circumstantial and rather flakey.......
by Winnershroyal » 06 May 2011 16:10
RobRoyalWycombe Royal So your view is that they are guilty of all 7 charges (5 for QPR and 2 for Paladini) just on the logic that the FA would not have charged them otherwise?
Just because the FA think they are guilty it doesn't mean they actually are and from what I have heard most of their evidence is circumstantial and rather flakey.......
Surely you've heard that there's no smoke without fire?
by No Hoops » 06 May 2011 16:11
Wycombe Royalbrendywendy im with miss marple on this one
you leave her alone
by Seal » 06 May 2011 16:14
Who Moved The Goalposts? From Twitter...
bbc_matt Matt Slater
Interesting tidbit, I'm hearing FL can't now confirm Championship trophy will be at Loftus Rd after all. I make no further comment
It gets more intriguing!
by bobby m's syrup » 06 May 2011 16:16
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 133 guests