Broxroyal This type of game isn't as uncommon as you might think.
Broxroyal donkeys years ago, we played a Pompey X1
No further questions your honour.
by The Rouge » 05 Oct 2011 19:33
Broxroyal This type of game isn't as uncommon as you might think.
Broxroyal donkeys years ago, we played a Pompey X1
by melonhead » 05 Oct 2011 20:05
The RougeBroxroyal This type of game isn't as uncommon as you might think.Broxroyal donkeys years ago, we played a Pompey X1
No further questions your honour.
when i was a student in pompey
by rhroyal » 06 Oct 2011 01:05
This I agree with 1000%. (Not a typo, it would be 1000% if possible) I don't agree with all opinions on team selections, performances, finances etc. What would be the point of a message board if I did?Isaac HuntRoyalBlueIsaac Hunt Just guessing here, but i would imagine one of the considerations was that RFC decided that it was more convenient to arrange fixtures for the development squad as and when they see fit, as opposed to be tied to a fixture list (and possible cost of being a member of the Combination League).
There may have been occasions in the past that didn't suit us taking players down to Exeter/Brighton etc on a Wednesday afternoon just for the sake of fulfilling a fixture.
It strikes me that yesterday's fixture came about for a number of reasons. Some of the squad hadn't played a game in a while (injury/new signing) - we had some trialists that we wanted to see in a game situation - it was a convenient local fixture - (as Ian says) a community friendly relationship.
It was just a practice match ffs. The opposition were a change of scenery to just playing 11 v 11 in training.
If they just wanted the latter, that could have been achieved by playing a team from STAR or Hob Nob!
Don't disagree with some of the philosophy behind the game, just would have thought they could have stretched them a bit more than a University team who in all probability have only just started playing again after an extremely long summer break.
10 years ago a game like this wouldn't have even been reported. I find it amazing that some people feel the need to question the reasons behind the club deciding to play a game of this nature. Who gives a fvck?
by Royal Rother » 06 Oct 2011 09:32
by M-U-R-T-Y » 06 Oct 2011 09:53
by melonhead » 06 Oct 2011 09:54
by Ian Royal » 06 Oct 2011 11:59
by FiNeRaIn » 06 Oct 2011 15:42
by melonhead » 06 Oct 2011 16:05
by Arnie_Pie » 06 Oct 2011 17:39
floyd__streete And I've got yours. So go f*ck yourself.
by floyd__streete » 07 Oct 2011 13:46
Arnie_Piefloyd__streete And I've got yours. So go f*ck yourself.
rhroyal has hit a nerve.
Kes Definitely rattled.
by floyd__streete » 07 Oct 2011 13:47
by LoyalRoyalFan » 07 Oct 2011 16:10
by floyd__streete » 07 Oct 2011 16:42
LoyalRoyalFan He hasn't even played yet so how can anyone judge him?
by rhroyal » 07 Oct 2011 20:44
floyd__streete I think if we've gained anything from the thread and indeed the signing of Cedric Baseya it is clarification from rhroyal as to what can and can't be reasonably discussed on this board. Cedric - thank you.
by grey_squirrel » 07 Oct 2011 20:59
by catfork » 08 Oct 2011 00:09
floyd__streeteLoyalRoyalFan He hasn't even played yet so how can anyone judge him?
Yes he has, he has played against Reading University. He scored twice. Big game against Rabson's Rovers next week, that'll sort the wheat from the chaff.
by floyd__streete » 08 Oct 2011 01:24
rhroyal a friendly against Reading uni is by far the most trivial of the lot.
by Royal Rother » 08 Oct 2011 20:25
by floyd__streete » 09 Oct 2011 13:02
Royal Rother Give it up chap - he owns you on this thread.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 325 guests