The Snowball stat thread

[Snowball]

I see snowball once again comes up with some spurious bollocks to avoid admitting he got something wrong.

You must be the most worthless little cowardly shit I have ever had the misfortune to know

Reported. I've had enough of this simpleton abusing innocent posters who just wish to talk about football.

and how exactly is this (the post I responded to)

"talking about football"?

I see snowball once again comes up with some spurious bollocks to avoid admitting he got something wrong.

That was nothing other than classic Ian Royal piggy-backing, attacking me for the sake of it

[Snowball]

You made no serious claims as to Harte's ability other than "he will score and assist and be better than Williams", to claim that makes you RIGHT when he does score from set pieces is weird. I mean, you were right, but that was something nobody doubted, and it was in the context of you knowing better than everyone else.

In your DREAMS. I was posting saying that we had done better ad Carlisle had
dropped like a stone within a few matches of him joining us


and being ridiculed, of course. Until he scored a shed-full, that is

[Snowball]

Good result with Blackpool drawing at home.

Had we played at Donny and won, we'd be third now

3 29 10-5-0 23-06 4-3-7 24-21 +20 50 Birmingham
4 30 09-2-3 28-19 4-9-3 19-16 +12 50 Cardiff City
5 30 09-4-2 25-11 4-6-5 24-26 +12 49 Blackpool
6 29 09-1-5 19-13 6-3-5 12-12 +06 49 Hull City
7 29 08-4-4 23-14 6-2-5 14-13 +10 48 Reading

[winchester_royal]

Cunt.

What? You can write that and my "ginger twat" comment about Fochs get deleted.. WTF is the world coming to? Can one no longer have a resonable and sustained go at Estate agents?

TBF, as horrendous as estate agents are... Snowball is infinitely worse. So it's okay.

[Snowball]

Odds on promotion cut from 6/1 to 4/1, 16/1 to be champs

Surprised to see you can get Birmingham at 13/2 and spread bets for them to beat 78 points

[JC]

Good result with Blackpool drawing at home.

Had we played at Donny and won, we'd be third now

3 29 10-5-0 23-06 4-3-7 24-21 +20 50 Birmingham
4 30 09-2-3 28-19 4-9-3 19-16 +12 50 Cardiff City
5 30 09-4-2 25-11 4-6-5 24-26 +12 49 Blackpool
6 29 09-1-5 19-13 6-3-5 12-12 +06 49 Hull City
7 29 08-4-4 23-14 6-2-5 14-13 +10 48 Reading

But if everybody won their games in hand we would be 5th

[Snowball]

Good result with Blackpool drawing at home.

Had we played at Donny and won, we'd be third now

But if everybody won their games in hand we would be 5th

1 30 +17 59 West Ham
2 30 +22 55 Southampton
3 30 +21 53 Birmingham
4 30 +07 52 Hull City
5 30 +11 51 Reading
6 30 +12 50 Cardiff City
7 30 +12 49 Blackpool

(1-0 wins)


I could live with that, 5th, above Cardiff and Blackpool with 16 games to go

[Extended-Phenotype]

How! Big Chief!

Er, yeah. But how?

[Hoop Blah]

If you're going to include international goals then it is 28.

Not my point. If I have 5 apples I also have 4 apples
but I don't have six apples



I just LOVE the way this list works.


The original point was I said Shane Long would be a 20-Goal a season Championship player

He WAS. End. The fact that he EXCEEDED my prediction has now got a load of saddos
scurrying around desperate to prove I may be a goal out, as if somehow then I'd be wrong. So what if I am?

The point is what I predicted came true and then some. That's the important bit.

And I made that prediction, stuck to it, bet on it and made money on it, in the face of ridicule

Just to pick up on the bolded point above. The original discussion was that Long needed to be dropped in about late October/November because he wasn't doing enough to win us games. He was scoring enough and didn't look like he was ever going to score from open play (obviously if he played a full season he would, that's just a little poetic licence).

The general point was that if he was taken out of the side we might've scored a few more goals and won a few more games pre-Christmas.

You turned it into a statfest and proving that he could statistically score the number he did but the theme of the Long criticism was his contribution and goals from open play.

Of those 24 goals (or however many goals you want to give him) I think 6 or 7, maybe more, were from the spot and so not from open play, the original source of criticism from most.

Carry on.

[Snowball]

01 P30 - - GD16 - - 57 West Ham
02 P31 - - GD22 - - 56 Southampton
============================
03 P31 - - GD15 - - 53 Cardiff
04 P31 - - GD14 - - 52 Blackpool
05 P30 - - GD20 - - 51 Birmingham
06 P30 - - GD11 - - 51 Reading
=============================
07 P30 - - GD06 - - 50 Hull
08 P30 - - GD04 - - 50 Middlesbrough
09 P31 - - GD03 - - 49 Brighton
10 P31 - - GD08 - - 47 Burnley
11 P31 - - GD03 - - 45 Leeds



Looking Good!

[Snowball]

Update after DERBY

0,258 Minutes 04 Major Contributions one every 065 Minutes 2 Goals 2 Assists Roberts
1,543 Minutes 11 Major Contributions one every 140 Minutes 6 Goals 5 Assists ALF
0,446 Minutes 03 Major Contributions one every 147 Minutes 3 Goals 0 Assists MANSET
1,715 Minutes 11 Major Contributions one every 156 Minutes 3 Goals 8 Assists KEBE
1,670 Minutes 09 Major Contributions one every 186 Minutes 4 Goals 5 Assists HUNT

1,255 Minutes 06 Major Contributions one every 209 Minutes 0 Goals 6 Assists HARTE
1,496 Minutes 07 Major Contributions one every 214 Minutes 6 Goals 1 Assists CHURCH
1,347 Minutes 06 Major Contributions one every 225 Minutes 3 Goals 3 Assists HRK

2,115 Minutes 09 Major Contributions one every 235 Minutes 4 Goals 5 Assists McAnuff
2,116 Minutes 03 Major Contributions one every 705 Minutes 1 Goals 2 Assists KARACAN
0,745 Minutes 01 Major Contributions one every 745 Minutes 3 Goals 0 Assists GRIFFIN
2,800 Minutes 03 Major Contributions one every 933 Minutes 3 Goals 0 Assists PEARCE
0,879 Minutes 01 Major Contributions one every 877 Minutes 3 Goals 0 Assists TABB

1,198 Minutes 01 Major Contributions one every 1,198 Minutes 0 Goals 1 Assists MILLS
2,428 Minutes 02 Major Contributions one every 1,214 Minutes 1 Goals 1 Assists L-WOOD
1,964 Minutes 00 Major Contributions one every ---- Minutes 0 Goals 0 Assists CUMMINGS

=================================================================================

0,022 Minutes 01 Major Contributions one every 022 Minutes 0 Goals 1 Assists CYWKA
0,180 Minutes 01 Major Contributions one every 180 Minutes 0 Goals 1 Assists Connolly

[Snowball]

9 Points better off than this time last season

06 Reading Played 30 GD-11 51 Points 2011-12
12 Reading Played 30 GD-11 42 Points 2010-11



6 Places higher than this time last season


17 Points off top Last Season
06 Points off top This Season

06 Points off 6th Last Season, IN 6th this season

[Snowball]

We are averaging 1.96 points per game for 24 games (= 90 Point Season)


And this is the more recent stuff

WLWWLWWWWLWLWWW

We have won 04 of the last 06 - 2.00 points per game
We have won 05 of the last 07 - 2.14 points per game
We have won 06 of the last 08 - 2.25 points per game
We have won 07 of the last 09 - 2.33 points per game
We have won 08 of the last 10 - 2.40 points per game
We have won 08 of the last 11 - 2.18 points per game
We have won 09 of the last 12 - 2.33 points per game
We have won 10 of the last 13 - 2.31 points per game
We have won 10 of the last 14 - 2.14 points per game
We have won 11 of the last 15 - 2.20 points per game



We have won 11 of the last 15 - 2.2 points per game

2.2 ppg = 101 Point Season



These are monster stats.

McDermott is already Manager of the Season IMO

[Snowball]

Figures in brackets are 46 game point total at this ppg

- Played WDL
1 24 14-5-05 : : 12 Clean Sheets - 33-19 +14 GD 47 Points 1.96 ppg Reading (90)
2 24 13-5-06 : : 10 Clean Sheets - 32-24 +08 GD 44 Points 1.83 ppg West Ham (84)
=====================================================
3 25 12-8-05 : : 10 Clean Sheets - 39-20 +19 GD 44 Points 1.76 ppg Birmingham (81)
4 24 12-5-07 : : 11 Clean Sheets - 27-19 +08 GD 41 Points 1.71 ppg Hull (79)
5 25 11-9-05 : : 08 Clean Sheets - 41-30 +11 GD 42 Points 1.68 ppg Cardiff (77)
6 25 11-8-06 : : 08 Clean Sheets - 39-24 +15 GD 41 Points 1.64 ppg Southampton (75)
====================================================
7 25 11-8-06 : : 06 Clean Sheets - 44-33 +11 GD 41 Points 1.64 ppg Blackpool (75)
8 26 13-3-10 : : 09 Clean Sheets - 9-28 +11 GD 42 Points 1.62 ppg Burnley (75)
9 25 11-5-09 : : 06 Clean Sheets - 8-35 +03 GD 38 Points 1.52 ppg Leeds (7)

[Only one Trevor Morley]

so if suddenly had average results say we won 6 drew 5 and lost 5 of last 16 games - that gives us 74 - how many times has that got a team in play off over last 15 years?

you'd like to think that burnley, palace, donny, portsmouth, forest and peterboro games might deliver those wins. run is difficult so i think we may finish around 75 mark....

[Snowball]

so if suddenly had average results say we won 6 drew 5 and lost 5 of last 16 games - that gives us 74 - how many times has that got a team in play off over last 15 years?

you'd like to think that burnley, palace, donny, portsmouth, forest and peterboro games might deliver those wins. run is difficult so i think we may finish around 75 mark....

I say 78+, should we have money on it?

[Ian Royal]

so if suddenly had average results say we won 6 drew 5 and lost 5 of last 16 games - that gives us 74 - how many times has that got a team in play off over last 15 years?

you'd like to think that burnley, palace, donny, portsmouth, forest and peterboro games might deliver those wins. run is difficult so i think we may finish around 75 mark....

depending on GD about 60-80% of the time based on our last 7 seasons in the Chump.

[Snowball]

so if suddenly had average results say we won 6 drew 5 and lost 5 of last 16 games

Of course it could always happen, OOTM, and the next one (Burnley) is a real toughie
but until a run changes drastically I would always go with its average ppg.

[Only one Trevor Morley]

actually probably get another win against millwall.... i think the spread is probably 75-77

[Only one Trevor Morley]

so if suddenly had average results say we won 6 drew 5 and lost 5 of last 16 games

Of course it could always happen, OOTM, and the next one (Burnley) is a real toughie
but until a run changes drastically I would always go with its average ppg.

would you back red if black had come up 10 times in a row in roulette? an innocent question by the way!