by Archie's penalty » 18 Feb 2012 07:46
by rfc2001 » 18 Feb 2012 08:37
by rfc2001 » 18 Feb 2012 08:49
by Platypuss » 18 Feb 2012 08:53
by Snowball » 18 Feb 2012 09:18
by melonhead » 18 Feb 2012 10:00
floyd__streete Got to be well happy with that. A more enjoyable game than of late, I thought that Burnley played very well indeed and will be gutted at not getting a point.....but it is swings and roundabouts because the 0-1 loss to Hull (our last defeat) was unfortunate. Burnley played some good football, they are a handful up front and a clean sheet (thanks to the woodwork) and six points from them is great business.
Reading played to their strengths as usual. Roberts held the ball up well as usual, wingers were busy, Hunt covered a lot of ground with limited tangible result but the work rate was good. Back 5 outstanding; an outstanding save from Federici for the second game running, but otherwise Harte-Gorkss-Pearce-Connolly was excellent once again. Pearce MOTM for me - the lack of pace issue is bogus, if it was a reall issue we'd have Usain Bolt at centre-half. Pearce is an excellent defender at this level for his positional sense and his good decision making. Connolly looked less like a centre-half playing at right back tonight and Harte's delivery was consistently good again from set pieces.
All set for play-off failure for a 6th time then
by melonhead » 18 Feb 2012 10:15
by The Rouge » 18 Feb 2012 10:30
floyd__streete Got to be well happy with that. A more enjoyable game than of late, I thought that Burnley played very well indeed and will be gutted at not getting a point.....but it is swings and roundabouts because the 0-1 loss to Hull (our last defeat) was unfortunate. Burnley played some good football, they are a handful up front and a clean sheet (thanks to the woodwork) and six points from them is great business.
Reading played to their strengths as usual. Roberts held the ball up well as usual, wingers were busy, Hunt covered a lot of ground with limited tangible result but the work rate was good. Back 5 outstanding; an outstanding save from Federici for the second game running, but otherwise Harte-Gorkss-Pearce-Connolly was excellent once again. Pearce MOTM for me - the lack of pace issue is bogus, if it was a reall issue we'd have Usain Bolt at centre-half. Pearce is an excellent defender at this level for his positional sense and his good decision making. Connolly looked less like a centre-half playing at right back tonight and Harte's delivery was consistently good again from set pieces.
All set for play-off failure for a 6th time then
by melonhead » 18 Feb 2012 10:40
by andrew1957 » 18 Feb 2012 10:40
by melonhead » 18 Feb 2012 10:43
by Elm Park Old Boy » 18 Feb 2012 10:50
by Spirit of Elm Park » 18 Feb 2012 10:58
by PieEater » 18 Feb 2012 11:09
floyd__streete Got to be well happy with that. A more enjoyable game than of late, I thought that Burnley played very well indeed and will be gutted at not getting a point.....but it is swings and roundabouts because the 0-1 loss to Hull (our last defeat) was unfortunate. Burnley played some good football, they are a handful up front and a clean sheet (thanks to the woodwork) and six points from them is great business.
Reading played to their strengths as usual. Roberts held the ball up well as usual, wingers were busy, Hunt covered a lot of ground with limited tangible result but the work rate was good. Back 5 outstanding; an outstanding save from Federici for the second game running, but otherwise Harte-Gorkss-Pearce-Connolly was excellent once again. Pearce MOTM for me - the lack of pace issue is bogus, if it was a reall issue we'd have Usain Bolt at centre-half. Pearce is an excellent defender at this level for his positional sense and his good decision making. Connolly looked less like a centre-half playing at right back tonight and Harte's delivery was consistently good again from set pieces.
All set for play-off failure for a 6th time then
by RoyalJames101 » 18 Feb 2012 11:16
Terminal Boardom The back 4 apart from Pearce were a complete shambles.
by melonhead » 18 Feb 2012 11:31
by Victor Meldrew » 18 Feb 2012 11:37
PieEaterfloyd__streete Got to be well happy with that. A more enjoyable game than of late, I thought that Burnley played very well indeed and will be gutted at not getting a point.....but it is swings and roundabouts because the 0-1 loss to Hull (our last defeat) was unfortunate. Burnley played some good football, they are a handful up front and a clean sheet (thanks to the woodwork) and six points from them is great business.
Reading played to their strengths as usual. Roberts held the ball up well as usual, wingers were busy, Hunt covered a lot of ground with limited tangible result but the work rate was good. Back 5 outstanding; an outstanding save from Federici for the second game running, but otherwise Harte-Gorkss-Pearce-Connolly was excellent once again. Pearce MOTM for me - the lack of pace issue is bogus, if it was a reall issue we'd have Usain Bolt at centre-half. Pearce is an excellent defender at this level for his positional sense and his good decision making. Connolly looked less like a centre-half playing at right back tonight and Harte's delivery was consistently good again from set pieces.
All set for play-off failure for a 6th time then
Pretty much agree with this except I'm not sure Pearce was so great. Yes he's solid in defence, well positioned and wins a lot of headers but the headers almost always fall to an opposition player outside the box. I also think he gives away far too many cheap throw ins when under the slightest of pressure, i'e the no risk option, but they are cheap and put us on the back foot, rather than taking a slight risk or showing a modicom of skill and playing out of the situation.
Connelly is also odd, he doesn't commit and tackle too much but seems to keep things under control down the wing. Burnley played their two full backs very high up the pitch, almost as wing backs and he did a pretty decent job keeping them quiet. Long would of had a field day against them. We miss overlapping runs of a fullback, although he did start them in the last 15mins.
The card happy ref also deserves a mention, there were some very meaty tackles from Burnley but he bottled the second yellow or straight red 2 or 3 times. To be fair, I thought Gorkss might have got a second yellow for a high tackle shortly after his first booking. It's also good to see the old interpretation of the offside rule back, Hunt offside and flagged before he touches the ball, he touches the ball and gets booked for not playing to the whistle
by Snowball » 18 Feb 2012 11:40
RoyalJames101Terminal Boardom The back 4 apart from Pearce were a complete shambles.
When did we last concede?
by dogzbollox » 18 Feb 2012 11:45
Platypuss What's this 3 games in 6 days rubbish?
Saturday - game
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday - game
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday - game
by Arnie_Pie » 18 Feb 2012 12:04
Terminal Boardom Well, where do I start? Thank oxf*rd I did not spunk £400 plus on a ST to watch that shit. For anyone out there who genuinely thinks Reading are the real deal then think again. What football that was played came from Burnley. Gorkss's positioning for Austin's header was not even Sunday League. Roberts took his only chance well but other than that...
Referee lost the plot in the second half. How Wallace stayed on the pitch is beyond me.
Hunt's ball across in stoppage time at the end of the game was a complete joke.
The back 4 apart from Pearce were a complete shambles. The midfield duo of Liegertwood and Karacan were passengers. Throughout the game there was absolutely no pressing or closing down of Burnley.
IMHO, a draw would have been a fair result.
And don't get me started on that fat lump in goal. WTF does Feds do? Where is the communication or dominance of the box?
I have seen far better non league games this season. That was shit!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 237 guests