by Deadlock » 29 May 2012 16:24
by wolsey » 29 May 2012 16:25
Deadlock Rangers took their national association to court? That's a(nother) European ban there, then.
by cmonurz » 29 May 2012 16:44
Mr Angry More on the Soap Opera that is Scottish Football, starring Rangers....
Judge Lord Glennie rules that a transfer embargo imposed on Rangers by the Scottish Football Association was unlawful, following a hearing at the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
It is just a total and complete fiasco up there! What price Pompey joining the Scottish League in 2013/14?
by Geekins » 29 May 2012 17:18
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 29 May 2012 21:02
cmonurzMr Angry More on the Soap Opera that is Scottish Football, starring Rangers....
Judge Lord Glennie rules that a transfer embargo imposed on Rangers by the Scottish Football Association was unlawful, following a hearing at the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
It is just a total and complete fiasco up there! What price Pompey joining the Scottish League in 2013/14?
Can anyone suggest how or why Rangers' appeal was successful?
by watfordroyal » 29 May 2012 21:40
Rev Algenon Stickleback HcmonurzMr Angry More on the Soap Opera that is Scottish Football, starring Rangers....
Judge Lord Glennie rules that a transfer embargo imposed on Rangers by the Scottish Football Association was unlawful, following a hearing at the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
It is just a total and complete fiasco up there! What price Pompey joining the Scottish League in 2013/14?
Can anyone suggest how or why Rangers' appeal was successful?
The punishment wasn't in the SPL's rules.
Coincidentally, in the SPL's rules, a reformed club can't just restart straight back in the SPL either, which could be interesting.
by Platypuss » 29 May 2012 21:47
by watfordroyal » 29 May 2012 21:54
Platypuss I thought I heard on R5 that they can exclude them from the Scottish FA Cup next season.
by Terminal Boardom » 30 May 2012 10:08
by Tony Le Mesmer » 30 May 2012 10:17
Terminal Boardom The reason that the FL are doing everything they can to support PFC is because losing a club in this particular manner would reflect badly on their brand. Plus, it could open the floodgates and see more clubs go to the wall thus rendering the lower reaches of the FL a complete farce. The sooner the FL restructure Leagues 1 and 2 and incorporate the Conference so that there are 3 leagues at that level the better - a North, Midlands and South division. Costs would reduce and crowds would increase owing to the reduction in travelling.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 30 May 2012 12:40
Terminal Boardom The sooner the FL restructure Leagues 1 and 2 and incorporate the Conference so that there are 3 leagues at that level the better - a North, Midlands and South division. Costs would reduce and crowds would increase owing to the reduction in travelling.
by Deadlock » 30 May 2012 15:57
Financial Times reporters Jane Croft and Roger Blitz (who have never heard of paragraphs) Controversy over the football creditors rule, which allows clubs and their employees to be paid ahead of other creditors if a club becomes insolvent, looks set to rumble on despite a High Court judgment in favour of the Football League.
Revenue & Customs on Friday failed in its attempt to have the court declare the rule unlawful and void.
Critics say it is unacceptable to allow highly paid footballers to be first in the queue of creditors ahead of cash-strapped small businesses and charities such as St John Ambulance, as well as HMRC.
However, Mr Justice David Richards, giving his ruling, said the proceedings were “not concerned with whether giving propriety to football creditors is socially or morally justified” but was “one purely of law” and on whether the provisions conflict with two fundamental principles of insolvency law.
The judge said the Football League “should not regard the result of this case as an endorsement of its approach to football creditors” but it was “a decision on a challenge brought on a particular legal basis”.
HMRC, which has been given permission to appeal against the ruling, said it was disappointed with the judgment, and would consider an appeal.
The rule was unfair to other unsecured creditors who were “forced to make do with much smaller returns – if anything – on monies owed to them by football clubs which enter administration”, HMRC said.
During the hearing last year, the High Court was told the rule had been “invented” by the Football League and Premier League and was “not a rule created by parliament”.
The case is significant because there had been 36 Football League insolvencies between March 2002 and 2011, and insolvency was a “very real hazard”, the court heard.
The Football League said defeat in the High Court would have had devastating consequences for football, because clubs would have been unwilling to compete against rivals that had defaulted on debts.
“We remain committed to a constructive dialogue with the tax authorities, as we share the common aim of ensuring that clubs meet their liabilities as and when they fall due, including sums owed to HMRC,” the league said
by M-U-R-T-Y » 12 Jun 2012 11:28
by Mr Angry » 12 Jun 2012 11:59
by Platypuss » 12 Jun 2012 12:42
Mr Angry http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18407309
One step closer to liquidation.
by Tony Le Mesmer » 12 Jun 2012 13:22
by floyd__streete » 12 Jun 2012 13:44
Tony Le Mesmer Thats it then. RIP ROFLangers. They can start a Newco, but its a new football club entirely. All history gone. Bye then.
by soggy biscuit » 12 Jun 2012 14:09
floyd__streeteTony Le Mesmer Thats it then. RIP ROFLangers. They can start a Newco, but its a new football club entirely. All history gone. Bye then.
Meh. The clubs won't vote them out the SPL when Rangers provide them with half their income every season so they can start afresh as a new-co having thrown off their debts.
Hurrah! Another triumph for footbaLOLLOL.
by Uke » 12 Jun 2012 14:40
floyd__streeteTony Le Mesmer Thats it then. RIP ROFLangers. They can start a Newco, but its a new football club entirely. All history gone. Bye then.
Meh. The clubs won't vote them out the SPL when Rangers provide them with half their income every season so they can start afresh as a new-co having thrown off their debts.
Hurrah! Another triumph for footbaLOLLOL.
by watfordroyal » 12 Jun 2012 15:12
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 88 guests