by RoyalX » 04 Jun 2012 15:40
by TheWearing » 04 Jun 2012 15:48
RoyalX wrote:Lillestrom have received an offer according to SSN. They don't know who from though.
by Franchise FC » 04 Jun 2012 15:49
TheWearing wrote:RoyalX wrote:Lillestrom have received an offer according to SSN. They don't know who from though.
Cardiff
by Friday's Legacy » 04 Jun 2012 15:50
RoyalX wrote:Lillestrom have received an offer according to SSN. They don't know who from though.
by TheWearing » 04 Jun 2012 15:52
Franchise FC wrote:TheWearing wrote:RoyalX wrote:Lillestrom have received an offer according to SSN. They don't know who from though.
Cardiff
Excellent - it's the name a random club game ........... Bradford
by TheLawnMowerMan » 04 Jun 2012 17:08
TheWearing wrote:Is your profile pic some sort of self portrait?
by Friday's Legacy » 04 Jun 2012 17:54
by TheWearing » 04 Jun 2012 18:10
Friday's Legacy wrote:Not from me, but he seems reliable - We have apparently gone back with an improved offer but are reluctant to pay £3m. Local media still make Wolves favourites, but may not yet know of our revised bid. BigFoot will be able to vouch for this source.
by Dare to Dr£am » 04 Jun 2012 19:06
TheWearing wrote:Friday's Legacy wrote:Not from me, but he seems reliable - We have apparently gone back with an improved offer but are reluctant to pay £3m. Local media still make Wolves favourites, but may not yet know of our revised bid. BigFoot will be able to vouch for this source.
I will be happy if we don't sign Sigurdarson, even though he has played very well for LSK I doubt he will be able to cope with the PL. Personally he would be a good 3rd or 4th striker but £3million for an unproven player is too much!

by Extended-Phenotype » 05 Jun 2012 12:14
melonhead wrote:Extended-Phenotype wrote:melonhead wrote:no one has bought him for 4 million.
That's why I said 'if'.
bit of a pointless argument then innit
by melonhead » 06 Jun 2012 11:18
Extended-Phenotype wrote:melonhead wrote:Extended-Phenotype wrote:That's why I said 'if'.
bit of a pointless argument then innit
Arguing that a player who is worth 4m to the club, is worth 4m? Yeah, I think so.
by HoneyRoastHoax » 06 Jun 2012 11:23
melonhead wrote:
![]()
how is he worth 4 million again?
by Royalwaster » 06 Jun 2012 11:29
by Extended-Phenotype » 06 Jun 2012 13:40
melonhead wrote:Extended-Phenotype wrote:melonhead wrote:
bit of a pointless argument then innit
Arguing that a player who is worth 4m to the club, is worth 4m? Yeah, I think so.
![]()
how is he worth 4 million again?
by melonhead » 06 Jun 2012 15:25
by Geekins » 06 Jun 2012 15:30
by melonhead » 06 Jun 2012 15:36
Geekins wrote:Surely he's worth whatever anyone is willing to pay? Maybe you don't think he's worth it but then you're not the one with the money.
by Extended-Phenotype » 06 Jun 2012 15:41
melonhead wrote:a club asking for 4 million, doesnt mean hes worth 4 million.
hes not worth 4 million.
i just enjoy reigniting circular arguments for no reason
by Royal Rother » 06 Jun 2012 15:42
by Geekins » 06 Jun 2012 15:44
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 159 guests