by Royal Rother » 04 Oct 2013 11:50
by melonhead » 04 Oct 2013 14:37
Royal Rother That article was published 18 months ago.
by One8Seven1 » 04 Oct 2013 18:06
Uke Anton is the sole shareholder for TSI, I was more under the impression they were a consortium.
http://www.readingfc.co.uk/global/company-details.aspx
melonhead i think he is backed with investment from shadowy underworld figures who do not want their names bandied about in public company records, so theres obviously a deal in place behind the scenes- contracts etc guaranteeing them shares of any profits from whatever he makes out of it
Royal Lady I thought TSI was a consortium of Samuelson, his son, that Andrew bloke and a couple of others...... what's happened to them?
by Royal Lady » 05 Oct 2013 13:10
by Uke » 05 Oct 2013 15:41
Royal Lady 1. It doesn't matter if that link is 18 months old - it's still pertinent is it not? We were, supposedly, the first of other sporting acquisitions, but they a) haven't completed this acquisition and b) do not appear to have bought any others - why?
2. Clearly, it is NOT a consortium. TSI is 100% owned by Anton. The "prince" and the Samuelsons are merely directors of the company.
Glad I've made that clear for you.
by Pepe the Horseman » 06 Oct 2013 11:36
One8Seven1 Yes, one of which is supposedly a Prince and an active member of the board.
by winchester_royal » 06 Oct 2013 12:03
Pepe the HorsemanOne8Seven1 Yes, one of which is supposedly a Prince and an active member of the board.
What's his username?
by RoyalBlue » 06 Oct 2013 19:43
Ian Royal Again, I recall at the time Madejski saying he felt no need to talk to Kenwright about it.
by Royal Rother » 06 Oct 2013 20:04
by Alexander Litvinenko » 06 Oct 2013 20:36
RoyalBlue As far as I can see, there is plenty of evidence to suggest that Anton has been happy and able to put financial backing into the club from the time he first got involved up until now.
by AthleticoSpizz » 06 Oct 2013 20:44
by SPARTA » 07 Oct 2013 13:45
by Alexander Litvinenko » 07 Oct 2013 13:50
by Extended-Phenotype » 07 Oct 2013 13:51
by Uke » 07 Oct 2013 15:49
Extended-Phenotype Lesson learned: if it smells fishy, it's mostly likely a fish.
by melonhead » 07 Oct 2013 15:55
Extended-Phenotype But we were all barking mad for thinking it?
Be interested to see how me good ol' pal OT-VII Melonhead will spin this one.
.
by Extended-Phenotype » 07 Oct 2013 16:00
melonheadExtended-Phenotype But we were all barking mad for thinking it?
Be interested to see how me good ol' pal OT-VII Melonhead will spin this one.
.
obsessed!
i will as usual wait for some actual evidence, and base my opinions on that
by Alexander Litvinenko » 07 Oct 2013 16:08
melonhead i will as usual wait for some actual evidence, and base my opinions on that
by windermere_royal » 07 Oct 2013 16:14
by Cobi » 07 Oct 2013 16:16
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests