Norwich v Reading OFFICIAL Prediction Thread

[Snowball]

Rules as per the previous few leagues games



Point for correctly predicting first team to score. You cannot use this
as insurance. For example Reading to win 2-0 but United to score first,


Bonus point for standard format exactly as the example below:

Norwich 1-0 Reading HT
Norwich 3-1 Reading FT

Norwich to score first <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Norwich 42
Bod 49
Norwich 80. 90

I ask for this because it saves time transcribing

Bonus points awarded for games of 3 or more goals where the goal sequence
is given correctly. You predict that spot on and get beaucoup extra points.

Anyone getting first Reading goal-scorer points, gets a 5 point bonus
if they are within one minute either way


All older rules apply







Points awarded for HT Correct Result (1), HT Correct Score (3) (except for 0-0 which scores 1)

Further explanation. (at HT) You get 0 points for wrong, 1 point for correct result,
3 points for a correct score other than 0-0 which only scores 1 point
At HT or FT if you get the correct score you DON'T get 4 points for correct score (3) and result (1)


Points awarded for FT Correct Result (1), FT Correct Score (3) (including 0-0)

FT - You get 0 points for wrong, 1 point for correct result,
3 points for a correct score including 0-0

3 Points added for first Reading Goal-Scorer if the score or result is also correct

( PLEASE NOTE: If you predict a first-half RFC scorer then your first half score/result decides your FGS bonus) even if things change radically second half


Example: You predict Kelly 25 and 1-0 HT, 2-1 FT. Kelly scores first half and Reading are 1-0 up at HT = you earn 3+3 points. Second half we fall apart and lose 1-4, your HT score/scorer marks are still good.

The rules do not prevent you posting impossible predictions like RFC 1-0 HT, 0-3 FT

OWN GOALS

Last game we had an OG in Reading's favour (ie by a Cardiff player)

Such OG's DO COUNT as First RFC Scorer, as per most sane bookies


Remember -3 points is awarded for the worst prediction


In the event of me failing to post a separate prediction, I'll use this example

[Snowball]

Only formal predictions in THIS thread will apply


PS Can't you rename the chatter thread?

[Old Man Andrews]

Norwich 2-0 Reading HT
Norwich 4-1 Reading FT

Norwich to score first <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Norwich 13' 24
Norwich 51'
Kelly 58'
Norwich 89'

[Silver Fox]

1-7

Barrow 12, 14, 21, 48, 61, 90+4
Kelly 56

[Old Man Andrews]

1-7

Barrow 12, 14, 21, 48, 61, 90+4
Kelly 56

I wonder what the chances are of us even having 7 shots on target in the match?

[Hound]

(1)1- (1)1

Bodvarsson

[John Smith]

Norwich 1-0 Reading HT
Norwich 3-1 Reading FT

Oliveira, Murphy, Maddison
Böðvarsson 89

[linkenholtroyal]

Ht reading 1-0 Norwich
Ft reading 2-2 norwich

Bodvarsson 26
Kermorgant 86

[Silver Fox]

1-7

Barrow 12, 14, 21, 48, 61, 90+4
Kelly 56

I wonder what the chances are of us even having 7 shots on target in the match?

No idea really, but it can't be too unlikely as we're going to score 7 goals

[Royal_jimmy]

Norwich 0-1 Reading

Bacuna pen 88'

[Snowball]

Delirium Attack

[The Royal Forester]

Norwich 1--0 Reading HT
Norwich 2--0 Readong FT
Norwich to score first
39 & 52

[Brum Royal]

Norwich 0-0 Reading HT
Norwich 0-0 Reading FT

[finchroyal]

norwich 2 readin 2 ht
norwich 4 reading 4 ft

gunter all four
first goal 22 secs

[genome]

HT Norwich 1 Reading 0
FT Norwich 3 Reading 1

Barrow 78

[Barney]

Norwich 1-0 Reading HT
Norwich 2-0 Reading FT

Norwich to score first.

Norwich 28
Norwich 85

[North Royal Lad]

Norwich 2 Reading 2

[North Royal Lad]

Norwich 2 Reading 2

[Snowball]

x x 1 7 Silver Fox NTS

x x 0 1 Royal Jimmy Bacuna (P) 86

==========================================================================

2 2 4 4 finchroyal NTS Gunter 22 secs, plus 3 more
1 0 2 2 linkenholtroyal Bod 26, Kermie 86
1 1 1 1 Hound Bod
0 0 0 0 Brum Royal

==========================================================================

1 0 3 1 John Smith N-N-N; Bod 89
1 0 3 1 genome Barrow 78
1 0 2 0 The Royal Forrester N39, N52
1 0 2 0 Barney N28, N85
2 0 4 1 Old Man Andrews NO 13-24-51; Kelly 58; NO 89


NTS = Not taken seriously

[seahawk10]

1-7

Barrow 12, 14, 21, 48, 61, 90+4
Kelly 56

This is so ridiculous. Everyone knows Stam would take him off around the 88 minute mark to get a standing ovation after scoring 5. Can you adjust that last goal to the 85 minute to be sure he gets his double hat trick?

Cheers!