MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

415 posts
Brain Traysers
Member
Posts: 663
Joined: 06 Jul 2004 12:02
Location: Cascadia

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by Brain Traysers » 20 Feb 2021 15:59

bcubed
Brain Traysers
Snowflake Royal Three good opportunities from us. All wide.


Generous to say "good". Best chance so far is one goal in 20 efforts

We haven't created much quality at all (which is probably why none have troubled the keeper). Players unsurprisingly look knackered


Don't agree

Rino chance was gilt edged
Ejaria was decent but he pulled his shot
TMac should have done better

All good chances


Welcome to disagree, but the data say otherwise. Highest xG value of the lot was 0.05. Headers - even from close range - rarely hit the target. Similarly, any goal from outside the box is rare, it's just easy to forget the 1000s each season that fly harmlessly high and wide.

retro royal
Member
Posts: 653
Joined: 14 Jun 2004 22:50
Location: Siesta Time in Gibraltar

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by retro royal » 20 Feb 2021 16:00

Come change things at halftime, change formation two up top and try to win this game, we can't play on the counter now, boro will sit back

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22731
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by Sutekh » 20 Feb 2021 16:00

Yet again Reading’s season is being damaged by awful home form (awful being comparative to the club’s position in the league table as the same record last season would have been seen as not too bad). After this debacle it’ll be 7 of 16 games lost but at least there haven’t been any draws to worsen it further. Other teams in the top 6 have lost less than half that number at home. Really need to sharpen it up quickly.
Last edited by Sutekh on 20 Feb 2021 16:01, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lower West
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 5011
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:35
Location: Admiring Clem Morfuni at Work

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by Lower West » 20 Feb 2021 16:01

bcubed
Lower West
bcubed
My point from earlier
Clean strike from Rino and that's one up


That's clutching at straws. We lack any real threat going forward. Even more so once we go behind.


We create chances but don't finish them


That's our problem. Our ratio of chances to goals. Means we need to score first to open the game up. Go behind. We are so easy to play against.

User avatar
bcubed
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12599
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 18:16
Location: Would do better with a stick of rhubarb

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by bcubed » 20 Feb 2021 16:01

Brain Traysers
bcubed
Brain Traysers
Generous to say "good". Best chance so far is one goal in 20 efforts

We haven't created much quality at all (which is probably why none have troubled the keeper). Players unsurprisingly look knackered


Don't agree

Rino chance was gilt edged
Ejaria was decent but he pulled his shot
TMac should have done better

All good chances


Welcome to disagree, but the data say otherwise. Highest xG value of the lot was 0.05. Headers - even from close range - rarely hit the target. Similarly, any goal from outside the box is rare, it's just easy to forget the 1000s each season that fly harmlessly high and wide.


Yeh well I know what I see
Don't give a oxf*rd about xG
But thanks


andrew1957
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4415
Joined: 29 Sep 2006 14:40
Location: Reading

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by andrew1957 » 20 Feb 2021 16:01

Lower West
jt_1871 Any danger of Joao breaking into anything faster than a jog :evil: seems totally uninterested


Is that any different to any other game?


No point Joao wasting energy as he had had zero service so far.

User avatar
Lower West
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 5011
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:35
Location: Admiring Clem Morfuni at Work

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by Lower West » 20 Feb 2021 16:02

Sutekh Yet again Reading’s season is being damaged by awful home form (awful being comparative to the club’s position in the league table as the same record last season would have been seen as not too bad). After this debacle it’ll be 7 of 16 games lost but at least there haven’t been any draws to worsen it further. Other teams in the top 6 have lost less than have that number at home. Really need to sharpen it up quickly.


Lack of options in the squad to mix it up. Too many passengers in the team.

Brain Traysers
Member
Posts: 663
Joined: 06 Jul 2004 12:02
Location: Cascadia

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by Brain Traysers » 20 Feb 2021 16:02

bcubed
Brain Traysers
bcubed
Don't agree

Rino chance was gilt edged
Ejaria was decent but he pulled his shot
TMac should have done better

All good chances


Welcome to disagree, but the data say otherwise. Highest xG value of the lot was 0.05. Headers - even from close range - rarely hit the target. Similarly, any goal from outside the box is rare, it's just easy to forget the 1000s each season that fly harmlessly high and wide.


Yeh well I know what I see
Don't give a oxf*rd about xG
But thanks


"I don't agree with the data that proves I'm wrong"

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45985
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 20 Feb 2021 16:03

Brain Traysers
bcubed
Brain Traysers
Generous to say "good". Best chance so far is one goal in 20 efforts

We haven't created much quality at all (which is probably why none have troubled the keeper). Players unsurprisingly look knackered


Don't agree

Rino chance was gilt edged
Ejaria was decent but he pulled his shot
TMac should have done better

All good chances


Welcome to disagree, but the data say otherwise. Highest xG value of the lot was 0.05. Headers - even from close range - rarely hit the target. Similarly, any goal from outside the box is rare, it's just easy to forget the 1000s each season that fly harmlessly high and wide.

Fuk data. Those were all good chances.

It's alright everyone, we're only 1-0 down because xG says Boro shouldn't have scored from outside the box. :roll:
Last edited by Snowflake Royal on 20 Feb 2021 16:05, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
bcubed
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12599
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 18:16
Location: Would do better with a stick of rhubarb

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by bcubed » 20 Feb 2021 16:04

Brain Traysers
bcubed
Brain Traysers
Welcome to disagree, but the data say otherwise. Highest xG value of the lot was 0.05. Headers - even from close range - rarely hit the target. Similarly, any goal from outside the box is rare, it's just easy to forget the 1000s each season that fly harmlessly high and wide.


Yeh well I know what I see
Don't give a oxf*rd about xG
But thanks


"I don't agree with the data that proves I'm wrong"


See Snowflake reply

User avatar
NewCorkSeth
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9524
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 00:17
Location: Wherever Nameless may be.

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by NewCorkSeth » 20 Feb 2021 16:05

Do we think they are good chances because if Joao was taking those shots they would have been goals or would we expect the average player to score with them? I mean, I would have expected both to get those shots on target so I suppose they're decent chances minimum?

User avatar
bcubed
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12599
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 18:16
Location: Would do better with a stick of rhubarb

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by bcubed » 20 Feb 2021 16:06

NewCorkSeth Do we think they are good chances because if Joao was taking those shots they would have been goals or would we expect the average player to score with them? I mean, I would have expected both to get those shots on target so I suppose they're decent chances minimum?


Average champ players should hit the target with a crisp strike imo

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45985
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 20 Feb 2021 16:07

bcubed
Brain Traysers
bcubed
Yeh well I know what I see
Don't give a oxf*rd about xG
But thanks


"I don't agree with the data that proves I'm wrong"


See Snowflake reply

Absolutely mindless to say data on all headers and shots outside the box can determine that every header and shot from outside the box is a poor chance.

Like astoundingly stupid.


Westwood52
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1083
Joined: 08 Oct 2010 16:46

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by Westwood52 » 20 Feb 2021 16:07

I think Velcro needed to be more positive on the subs.Puskas up front with Jao.Estevez and Gibson doesn’t seem to be a step in the right direction.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45985
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 20 Feb 2021 16:08

NewCorkSeth Do we think they are good chances because if Joao was taking those shots they would have been goals or would we expect the average player to score with them? I mean, I would have expected both to get those shots on target so I suppose they're decent chances minimum?

I think you'd reasonably expect at least one of those three to go in.

karbota
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2132
Joined: 16 Mar 2019 16:36

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by karbota » 20 Feb 2021 16:08

Missed the start, did they take the knee?.

User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by Zip » 20 Feb 2021 16:09

andrew1957 Worst half this season IMO


Birmingham was worse

User avatar
NewCorkSeth
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9524
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 00:17
Location: Wherever Nameless may be.

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by NewCorkSeth » 20 Feb 2021 16:09

Snowflake Royal
NewCorkSeth Do we think they are good chances because if Joao was taking those shots they would have been goals or would we expect the average player to score with them? I mean, I would have expected both to get those shots on target so I suppose they're decent chances minimum?

I think you'd reasonably expect at least one of those three to go in.

I did certainly but I am known to be unreasonable.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 45985
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 20 Feb 2021 16:09

Don't think it was especially bad. Doing well until the goal. Then a bit aimless.

User avatar
NewCorkSeth
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9524
Joined: 05 Jul 2013 00:17
Location: Wherever Nameless may be.

Re: MATCHWATCH : Middlesbrough (h)

by NewCorkSeth » 20 Feb 2021 16:11

Refs on our side at least.

415 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 422 guests

It is currently 20 Jul 2025 00:02