NamelessYorkshireRoyal99Nameless
Potentially. Was just highlighting that even getting what looks like a suboptimal deal might actually be useful.
Puscas here for another year and not actually playing but taking a salary or Puscas gone and enough head room to bring in a huge lump to anchor the defence ?
I'm not suggesting it wouldn't be. I'm not going into the specifics because we don't know, the only thing we can assume at the moment is we've got a deal that isn't right for us for one reason or another.
Personally, I'd rather we move Puscas on for the best deal that we can get, bring Sarr in and see what is left. If the scenario is that we were left with Puscas, we wouldn't be helpless as that still leaves us with another forward in the squad who is useful and we can try and negotiate deals without paying anything towards wages on loan deals. Obviously a lot harder and not ideal mind you.
Why assume there is a deal that isn’t right for us ?
We can’t force deals through without willing partners.
Ok forget the "we", I'll just go with I'm assuming that we've received offers that aren't right for us. It might not be the case however.