by Brogue » 01 Mar 2023 12:49
by Nameless » 01 Mar 2023 12:50
by Brogue » 01 Mar 2023 12:53
Nameless Already in the correct place - R&G
by Millsy » 03 Mar 2023 13:11
BrogueNameless Already in the correct place - R&G
Ok I hadn’t seen that. But we have no mods to move when confirmed. the team section is where the most traffic is. So here we are.
by Brogue » 03 Mar 2023 13:18
MillsyBrogueNameless Already in the correct place - R&G
Ok I hadn’t seen that. But we have no mods to move when confirmed. the team section is where the most traffic is. So here we are.
Thanks Brogue yes it's in R&G where it belongs but in a way you're right, certainly caught my attention being here.
by Millsy » 03 Mar 2023 14:12
BrogueMillsyBrogue
Ok I hadn’t seen that. But we have no mods to move when confirmed. the team section is where the most traffic is. So here we are.
Thanks Brogue yes it's in R&G where it belongs but in a way you're right, certainly caught my attention being here.
It’s no longer a rumour or gossip. What now?
by Sutekh » 03 Mar 2023 14:40
MillsyBrogueMillsy
Thanks Brogue yes it's in R&G where it belongs but in a way you're right, certainly caught my attention being here.
It’s no longer a rumour or gossip. What now?
I've not been keeping up, thought it still was, sorry. I suspect they're "confimred" it and move it here? Don't know.
by Dirk Gently » 03 Mar 2023 14:42
SutekhMillsyBrogue
It’s no longer a rumour or gossip. What now?
I've not been keeping up, thought it still was, sorry. I suspect they're "confimred" it and move it here? Don't know.
The facts currently, as stated by Paul Ince, surrounding a deduction are that he and club are expecting a points deduction to be confirmed at some point next week for some more naughtiness that occurred BEFORE all this cr@p started last year. It is expected to be a 6 point deduction but think this figure has just been latched onto because that’s the amount suspended failing to comply with the FLs agreed business plan. As the naughtiness comes from a year or two ago however it might actually turn out to be a points deduction of greater or lesser value than the amount currently suggested. As ever the FL seem to drag these stupid things out for maximum irritation to everyone rather than just applying a penalty as soon as things are revealed.
When the penalty does happen, I hope the FL and/or also explain what the additional naughtiness was.
by Green » 03 Mar 2023 16:22
BrogueNameless Already in the correct place - R&G
Ok I hadn’t seen that. But we have no mods to move when confirmed. the team section is where the most traffic is. So here we are.
by Millsy » 03 Mar 2023 19:24
SutekhMillsyBrogue
It’s no longer a rumour or gossip. What now?
I've not been keeping up, thought it still was, sorry. I suspect they're "confimred" it and move it here? Don't know.
The facts currently, as stated by Paul Ince, surrounding a deduction are that he and club are expecting a points deduction to be confirmed at some point next week for some more naughtiness that occurred BEFORE all this cr@p started last year. It is expected to be a 6 point deduction but think this figure has just been latched onto because that’s the amount suspended failing to comply with the FL’s agreed business plan. As the naughtiness comes from a year or two ago however, and is therefore before the plan was drawn up, it might actually turn out to be a points deduction of greater or lesser value than the amount currently suggested. As ever the FL seem to drag these stupid things out for maximum irritation to everyone rather than just applying a penalty as soon as things are revealed.
When the penalty does happen, I hope the FL and/or club also explain what the additional naughtiness was so we can all point wildly at someone and pontificate further.
by SouthDownsRoyal » 03 Mar 2023 20:44
by Snowflake Royal » 03 Mar 2023 21:41
Dirk GentlySutekhMillsy
I've not been keeping up, thought it still was, sorry. I suspect they're "confimred" it and move it here? Don't know.
The facts currently, as stated by Paul Ince, surrounding a deduction are that he and club are expecting a points deduction to be confirmed at some point next week for some more naughtiness that occurred BEFORE all this cr@p started last year. It is expected to be a 6 point deduction but think this figure has just been latched onto because that’s the amount suspended failing to comply with the FLs agreed business plan. As the naughtiness comes from a year or two ago however it might actually turn out to be a points deduction of greater or lesser value than the amount currently suggested. As ever the FL seem to drag these stupid things out for maximum irritation to everyone rather than just applying a penalty as soon as things are revealed.
When the penalty does happen, I hope the FL and/or also explain what the additional naughtiness was.
And also what we might have done to avoid it since the first penalty was imposed, if it actually is the "suspended" penalty being imposed.
by Dirk Gently » 04 Mar 2023 13:03
Snowflake RoyalDirk GentlySutekh
The facts currently, as stated by Paul Ince, surrounding a deduction are that he and club are expecting a points deduction to be confirmed at some point next week for some more naughtiness that occurred BEFORE all this cr@p started last year. It is expected to be a 6 point deduction but think this figure has just been latched onto because that’s the amount suspended failing to comply with the FLs agreed business plan. As the naughtiness comes from a year or two ago however it might actually turn out to be a points deduction of greater or lesser value than the amount currently suggested. As ever the FL seem to drag these stupid things out for maximum irritation to everyone rather than just applying a penalty as soon as things are revealed.
When the penalty does happen, I hope the FL and/or also explain what the additional naughtiness was.
And also what we might have done to avoid it since the first penalty was imposed, if it actually is the "suspended" penalty being imposed.
I'm going out on a limb here, but I'm going to guess at spending less on new players / staff.
by Snowflake Royal » 04 Mar 2023 14:26
Dirk GentlySnowflake RoyalDirk Gently
And also what we might have done to avoid it since the first penalty was imposed, if it actually is the "suspended" penalty being imposed.
I'm going out on a limb here, but I'm going to guess at spending less on new players / staff.
You have to manufacture an argument at every possible opportunity, don't you..?
All the talk, and the previous context, is that this is "historic" - for financial irregularities *before* the first penalty was imposed. If so, just how do we undo the offences that had already happened? Why have a "suspended" sentence if it was always going to be imposed?
by Dirk Gently » 04 Mar 2023 15:44
by skipper » 04 Mar 2023 16:07
by Sutekh » 04 Mar 2023 16:12
by Forbury Lion » 08 Mar 2023 09:53
by Millsy » 08 Mar 2023 10:05
by Wycombe Royal » 08 Mar 2023 10:12
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests