by Ascotexgunner » 13 Jan 2024 20:45
by NathStPaul » 13 Jan 2024 20:53
Ascotexgunner Proud of those fans today that stood their ground and that they didn't whimper off.
It had to be done. I remember Blackpool doing the same and it eventually ended up contributing to the Indian owners selling up...,.so here's hoping.
by grey_squirrel » 13 Jan 2024 20:54
Ascotexgunner Proud of those fans today that stood their ground and that they didn't whimper off.
It had to be done. I remember Blackpool doing the same and it eventually ended up contributing to the Indian owners selling up...,.so here's hoping.
by Pepe the Horseman » 13 Jan 2024 21:00
NathStPaulAscotexgunner Proud of those fans today that stood their ground and that they didn't whimper off.
It had to be done. I remember Blackpool doing the same and it eventually ended up contributing to the Indian owners selling up...,.so here's hoping.
Blackpool supporters wanted the Oysten's out, not Indians.
by Ascotexgunner » 13 Jan 2024 21:01
NathStPaulAscotexgunner Proud of those fans today that stood their ground and that they didn't whimper off.
It had to be done. I remember Blackpool doing the same and it eventually ended up contributing to the Indian owners selling up...,.so here's hoping.
Blackpool supporters wanted the Oysten's out, not Indians.
by shadesrwrf » 13 Jan 2024 21:02
Pepe the HorsemanNathStPaulAscotexgunner Proud of those fans today that stood their ground and that they didn't whimper off.
It had to be done. I remember Blackpool doing the same and it eventually ended up contributing to the Indian owners selling up...,.so here's hoping.
Blackpool supporters wanted the Oysten's out, not Indians.
As one BBCRB caller pointed out, Asians shouldn't be allowed to own football clubs. No exceptions.
by Ascotexgunner » 13 Jan 2024 21:11
by tmesis » 13 Jan 2024 21:12
grey_squirreltmesisgrey_squirrel
What I don't understand is why he doesn't accept an appropriate offer now, which will include him as the primary secured creditor and run with that. Liquidation will mean he loses everything.
As the main creditor, he'd be first in line when the assets get sold off.
Whether he'd get more liquidating than a potential buyer would offer is a different matter.
If he kept us limping along on the bare minimum he'd get his £1 million rental fee every year, but it'd take a good few years for that to add up to significant sum.
The 'Club' is worth effectively nothing in comparison (especially right now). The Stadium is only relevant if it could generate income. Would it? Who would want it/want to use it regularly? £1M rental fee or whatever is a pie in the sky figure therefore. He could be done with it all and sell it back to the Thais who own the vicinity. What then, demolition? Nice new, shiny rail station on the doorstep. Prime, sort after real estate opportunity?........
by Webster750 » 13 Jan 2024 21:13
Pepe the HorsemanNathStPaulAscotexgunner Proud of those fans today that stood their ground and that they didn't whimper off.
It had to be done. I remember Blackpool doing the same and it eventually ended up contributing to the Indian owners selling up...,.so here's hoping.
Blackpool supporters wanted the Oysten's out, not Indians.
As one BBCRB caller pointed out, Asians shouldn't be allowed to own football clubs. No exceptions.
by NathStPaul » 13 Jan 2024 21:13
Pepe the HorsemanNathStPaulAscotexgunner Proud of those fans today that stood their ground and that they didn't whimper off.
It had to be done. I remember Blackpool doing the same and it eventually ended up contributing to the Indian owners selling up...,.so here's hoping.
Blackpool supporters wanted the Oysten's out, not Indians.
As one BBCRB caller pointed out, Asians shouldn't be allowed to own football clubs. No exceptions.
by Pepe the Horseman » 13 Jan 2024 21:27
NathStPaulPepe the HorsemanNathStPaul Blackpool supporters wanted the Oysten's out, not Indians.
As one BBCRB caller pointed out, Asians shouldn't be allowed to own football clubs. No exceptions.
Just general Asians?
by leon » 13 Jan 2024 21:35
by AthleticoSpizz » 13 Jan 2024 21:41
by jd82 » 13 Jan 2024 21:46
by jd82 » 13 Jan 2024 21:48
NathStPaul It had to happen. I don't think it should keep happening but I think a stand had to be made.
I feel sorry for the Port Vale fans, they have been extremely supportive of out plight. It would be a good idea for a representative of our supporters group to get in touch with Port Vale's supporters to see if there is a charitable organisation that they are linked to or are currently supporting. We of course can't compensate the Vale fans personally so maybe a bit of a fundraiser for a local Stoke cause would be a nice touch.
by Mr Angry » 13 Jan 2024 21:52
by Mr Angry » 13 Jan 2024 21:53
AscotexgunnerNathStPaulAscotexgunner Proud of those fans today that stood their ground and that they didn't whimper off.
It had to be done. I remember Blackpool doing the same and it eventually ended up contributing to the Indian owners selling up...,.so here's hoping.
Blackpool supporters wanted the Oysten's out, not Indians.
Ah..your right thinking of the Venkys
by 72 bus » 13 Jan 2024 21:55
Mid Sussex Royal Yes - as Selles said these people are fans for life.
by Ascotexgunner » 13 Jan 2024 21:57
Mr AngryAscotexgunnerNathStPaul Blackpool supporters wanted the Oysten's out, not Indians.
Ah..your right thinking of the Venkys
Who own Blackburn, and have never owned Blackpool.
by AthleticoSpizz » 13 Jan 2024 21:58
haven’t Blackburn got over the ‘Venky’ thing since?Mr AngryAscotexgunnerNathStPaul Blackpool supporters wanted the Oysten's out, not Indians.
Ah..your right thinking of the Venkys
Who own Blackburn, and have never owned Blackpool.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 388 guests