MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

178 posts

Result prediction

Reading win
14
50%
Draw
12
43%
Rotherham win
2
7%
 
Total votes: 28
User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 33001
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by leon » 23 Nov 2025 14:38

Snowflake Royal
leon
Snowflake Royal Not exactly very informative as a comment goes, leon. Whatever it's supposed to mean, it's one game.


He scored to give us the point.


Well yes but it was an example where he changed that one game.

Sorry to add to the conversation.

edit: it was Norwich not Blackburn
Last edited by leon on 23 Nov 2025 16:26, edited 1 time in total.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26686
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by Hound » 23 Nov 2025 14:42

Snowflake Royal Can't say I saw a whole lot of anything from Garcia.


He looked lively and wanted the ball but didn’t do anything hugely significant

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 33001
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by leon » 23 Nov 2025 14:44

Snowflake Royal Can't say I saw a whole lot of anything from Garcia.


He drove forward a bit from the left. Showed some attacking intent sorely lacking elsewhere. Showed for the ball didn’t get it much as we were preferring the threat from our centre backs passing to each other

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 23775
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by Sutekh » 23 Nov 2025 15:25

MR. CYNICAL
SouthDownsRoyal
MR. CYNICAL A team much higher in the table? You mean 4 more points more than us having played one more game. How our expectations are falling. Remember we were at home.
Agree on the desperate need for a striker though.


Seven places higher, yes.

Not sure what your point is, you could jump up 5 or 6 places with a win in this league. Peterborough beat 2nd place Stockport the other night. Don't see where a point at home to a team with 4 extra points is a good result.

It isn’t, it is very marginally better than getting a home point off a team in about the same position who haven’t beaten Reading for over 40 years though so perhaps there is some very slow improvement but the management need to show clear and obvious advances especially when they get 2 weeks clear to prepare. They haven’t and the next few weeks things get a bit disjointed with games all over the place….

Sat 29 Nov - Blackpool (a)
Sat 06 Dec - no game/free weekend
Tue 09 Dec - Peterborough United (h)
Sat 13 Dec - Bradford City (a)
Thu 18 Dec - Luton Town (h)
Sat 20 Dec - no game/free weekend
Fri 26 Dec - Plymouth Argyle (a)
Mon 29 Dec - Peterborough United (a)
Thu 01 Jan - Burton Albion (h)
Sun 04 Jan - Stockport County (h)
Sat 10 Jan - Mansfield Town (a) **
Sat 17 Jan - Leyton Orient (a)

** Game will be postponed if Mansfield beat Accrington in the FA Cup 2nd round.

There’s also a trip to Wigan that might get slotted into some midweek somewhere (if Mansfield win v Accrington and Wigan lose to Barrow in the FAC then there would be scope for Reading to play the league game at Wigan on 10th January).
Last edited by Sutekh on 23 Nov 2025 15:31, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 47755
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 23 Nov 2025 15:27

Hound
Snowflake Royal Can't say I saw a whole lot of anything from Garcia.


He looked lively and wanted the ball but didn’t do anything hugely significant

Thought the game was crying out for Kyerewaa :P :wink:


User avatar
SouthDownsRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12696
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 12:48

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by SouthDownsRoyal » 23 Nov 2025 22:55

Sutekh
MR. CYNICAL
SouthDownsRoyal
Seven places higher, yes.

Not sure what your point is, you could jump up 5 or 6 places with a win in this league. Peterborough beat 2nd place Stockport the other night. Don't see where a point at home to a team with 4 extra points is a good result.

It isn’t, it is very marginally better than getting a home point off a team in about the same position who haven’t beaten Reading for over 40 years though so perhaps there is some very slow improvement but the management need to show clear and obvious advances especially when they get 2 weeks clear to prepare. They haven’t and the next few weeks things get a bit disjointed with games all over the place….

Sat 29 Nov - Blackpool (a)
Sat 06 Dec - no game/free weekend
Tue 09 Dec - Peterborough United (h)
Sat 13 Dec - Bradford City (a)
Thu 18 Dec - Luton Town (h)
Sat 20 Dec - no game/free weekend
Fri 26 Dec - Plymouth Argyle (a)
Mon 29 Dec - Peterborough United (a)
Thu 01 Jan - Burton Albion (h)
Sun 04 Jan - Stockport County (h)
Sat 10 Jan - Mansfield Town (a) **
Sat 17 Jan - Leyton Orient (a)

** Game will be postponed if Mansfield beat Accrington in the FA Cup 2nd round.

There’s also a trip to Wigan that might get slotted into some midweek somewhere (if Mansfield win v Accrington and Wigan lose to Barrow in the FAC then there would be scope for Reading to play the league game at Wigan on 10th January).


Don’t let facts get in the way of a moan from some! :lol:

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26686
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by Hound » 24 Nov 2025 07:58

Snowflake Royal
Hound
Snowflake Royal Can't say I saw a whole lot of anything from Garcia.


He looked lively and wanted the ball but didn’t do anything hugely significant

Thought the game was crying out for Kyerewaa :P :wink:


Hmmm

Tbf I’ve never said he couldn’t be quite an effective sub to bring on in such a game

User avatar
stealthpapes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9289
Joined: 05 Jun 2013 13:25
Location: proverbs 26:11

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by stealthpapes » 24 Nov 2025 10:49

Semi-serious Richardson OUT comments will be posted on here by January.

Same squad, reset the clock on it starting to gel, many of the problems are injury/fitness related rather than competency related so even if new team fix them it will take time to see positive results.

But we weren’t shit and Savage scored a belter, so …

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 33001
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by leon » 24 Nov 2025 11:02

stealthpapes Semi-serious Richardson OUT comments will be posted on here by January.

Same squad, reset the clock on it starting to gel, many of the problems are injury/fitness related rather than competency related so even if new team fix them it will take time to see positive results.

But we weren’t shit and Savage scored a belter, so …


we lack basic movement in midfield / up front.


Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26686
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by Hound » 24 Nov 2025 11:42

Obvs people on here and esp crappy Twitter were going to be negative etc after the game, but I’m not totally sure what people were expecting. Suddenly start pinging the ball round like prime Barcelona and smashing every team we come across?

Same basic issues are there - lack of a suitable striker, too many poor and slow passes, conceding soft goals. LR not going to suddenly wave a magic wand and fix that

Truth is we dominated a side who have been on a fine run who had a very specific defensive gameplan - they had 1 shot on target and only 9 touches inside our penalty area. We weren’t amazing but created enough, KE had two very good chances, should have had a clear penalty and basically looked pretty solid.

Obvs work to be done but it was progress imo. Under Hunt the result may have been similar but even a team as poor as Donny had 8 shots on target and 23 touches in our area. We look a lot more solid and disciplined

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 33001
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by leon » 24 Nov 2025 11:45

Hound Obvs people on here and esp crappy Twitter were going to be negative etc after the game, but I’m not totally sure what people were expecting. Suddenly start pinging the ball round like prime Barcelona and smashing every team we come across?

Same basic issues are there - lack of a suitable striker, too many poor and slow passes, conceding soft goals. LR not going to suddenly wave a magic wand and fix that

Truth is we dominated a side who have been on a fine run who had a very specific defensive gameplan - they had 1 shot on target and only 9 touches inside our penalty area. We weren’t amazing but created enough, KE had two very good chances, should have had a clear penalty and basically looked pretty solid.

Obvs work to be done but it was progress imo. Under Hunt the result may have been similar but even a team as poor as Donny had 8 shots on target and 23 touches in our area. We look a lot more solid and disciplined


a fair summary - LR has his work cut out shaping this team and changing some of the behaviours.

User avatar
stealthpapes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9289
Joined: 05 Jun 2013 13:25
Location: proverbs 26:11

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by stealthpapes » 24 Nov 2025 11:47

leon
stealthpapes Semi-serious Richardson OUT comments will be posted on here by January.

Same squad, reset the clock on it starting to gel, many of the problems are injury/fitness related rather than competency related so even if new team fix them it will take time to see positive results.

But we weren’t shit and Savage scored a belter, so …


we lack basic movement in midfield / up front.


We got rid of Hunt. Sun-lit uplands ahead!

User avatar
stealthpapes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9289
Joined: 05 Jun 2013 13:25
Location: proverbs 26:11

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by stealthpapes » 24 Nov 2025 11:49

Hound Obvs people on here and esp crappy Twitter were going to be negative etc after the game, but I’m not totally sure what people were expecting. Suddenly start pinging the ball round like prime Barcelona and smashing every team we come across?

Same basic issues are there - lack of a suitable striker, too many poor and slow passes, conceding soft goals. LR not going to suddenly wave a magic wand and fix that

Truth is we dominated a side who have been on a fine run who had a very specific defensive gameplan - they had 1 shot on target and only 9 touches inside our penalty area. We weren’t amazing but created enough, KE had two very good chances, should have had a clear penalty and basically looked pretty solid.

Obvs work to be done but it was progress imo. Under Hunt the result may have been similar but even a team as poor as Donny had 8 shots on target and 23 touches in our area. We look a lot more solid and disciplined


Sarcasm and contempt for my fellow Biscuitmen aside, yeah, agree with most of that.

Just think it’s going to be a slow and steady job (slower and steadier, now) and I’m not sure there is the patience for it.


South Coast Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6900
Joined: 16 Jan 2020 17:29

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by South Coast Royal » 24 Nov 2025 12:03

Hound Obvs people on here and esp crappy Twitter were going to be negative etc after the game, but I’m not totally sure what people were expecting. Suddenly start pinging the ball round like prime Barcelona and smashing every team we come across?

Same basic issues are there - lack of a suitable striker, too many poor and slow passes, conceding soft goals. LR not going to suddenly wave a magic wand and fix that

Truth is we dominated a side who have been on a fine run who had a very specific defensive gameplan - they had 1 shot on target and only 9 touches inside our penalty area. We weren’t amazing but created enough, KE had two very good chances, should have had a clear penalty and basically looked pretty solid.

Obvs work to be done but it was progress imo. Under Hunt the result may have been similar but even a team as poor as Donny had 8 shots on target and 23 touches in our area. We look a lot more solid and disciplined


There will always be those that criticise blindly if we don't win games but on here (one can always hope) the comments are generally more considered and people are looking for reasons.

Unfortunately on Saturday once again when there has been a biggish crowd with some newbies and kids looking for entertainment we produced a rather sterile performance with so much "possession" but in the wrong areas.
I thought , with even greater injury concerns than us, Rotherham were quite a decent mid-table 3rd division side ,very well organised and not anything like the long ball Rotherham sides of the past and they thoroughly deserved the draw.

The manager and some posters on here spoke of us controlling the game-as I see it "controlling" is using the ball in all areas of the pitch whereas our possession and control took place in our own half and Rotherham just dropped off.
Very early days for Leam and his staff and we will know more about any change in style in the coming weeks but Saturday was just another Hunt game with slightly less long balls to nowhere in particular.

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 33001
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by leon » 24 Nov 2025 12:05

stealthpapes
leon
stealthpapes Semi-serious Richardson OUT comments will be posted on here by January.

Same squad, reset the clock on it starting to gel, many of the problems are injury/fitness related rather than competency related so even if new team fix them it will take time to see positive results.

But we weren’t shit and Savage scored a belter, so …


we lack basic movement in midfield / up front.


We got rid of Hunt. Sun-lit uplands ahead!


not sure that's what i'm saying. We've always had poor movement throughout the team.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26686
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by Hound » 24 Nov 2025 12:30

South Coast Royal
Hound Obvs people on here and esp crappy Twitter were going to be negative etc after the game, but I’m not totally sure what people were expecting. Suddenly start pinging the ball round like prime Barcelona and smashing every team we come across?

Same basic issues are there - lack of a suitable striker, too many poor and slow passes, conceding soft goals. LR not going to suddenly wave a magic wand and fix that

Truth is we dominated a side who have been on a fine run who had a very specific defensive gameplan - they had 1 shot on target and only 9 touches inside our penalty area. We weren’t amazing but created enough, KE had two very good chances, should have had a clear penalty and basically looked pretty solid.

Obvs work to be done but it was progress imo. Under Hunt the result may have been similar but even a team as poor as Donny had 8 shots on target and 23 touches in our area. We look a lot more solid and disciplined


There will always be those that criticise blindly if we don't win games but on here (one can always hope) the comments are generally more considered and people are looking for reasons.

Unfortunately on Saturday once again when there has been a biggish crowd with some newbies and kids looking for entertainment we produced a rather sterile performance with so much "possession" but in the wrong areas.
I thought , with even greater injury concerns than us, Rotherham were quite a decent mid-table 3rd division side ,very well organised and not anything like the long ball Rotherham sides of the past and they thoroughly deserved the draw.

The manager and some posters on here spoke of us controlling the game-as I see it "controlling" is using the ball in all areas of the pitch whereas our possession and control took place in our own half and Rotherham just dropped off.
Very early days for Leam and his staff and we will know more about any change in style in the coming weeks but Saturday was just another Hunt game with slightly less long balls to nowhere in particular.


There may have been some that I can’t remember - but what game this year did we dominate stats to the degree we did on Saturday under Hunt? Yes Rotherham were half decent as you’d expect and barely got in sight of our goal. And they were only leading for about half the game, so not like they totally shut up shop

I actually thought we were more long ball than usual

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 47755
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 24 Nov 2025 12:41

Hound Obvs people on here and esp crappy Twitter were going to be negative etc after the game, but I’m not totally sure what people were expecting. Suddenly start pinging the ball round like prime Barcelona and smashing every team we come across?

Same basic issues are there - lack of a suitable striker, too many poor and slow passes, conceding soft goals. LR not going to suddenly wave a magic wand and fix that

Truth is we dominated a side who have been on a fine run who had a very specific defensive gameplan - they had 1 shot on target and only 9 touches inside our penalty area. We weren’t amazing but created enough, KE had two very good chances, should have had a clear penalty and basically looked pretty solid.

Obvs work to be done but it was progress imo. Under Hunt the result may have been similar but even a team as poor as Donny had 8 shots on target and 23 touches in our area. We look a lot more solid and disciplined

Of course. It won’t stop the Richardson Out posts though.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 47755
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Rotherham United (h)

by Snowflake Royal » 24 Nov 2025 12:41

Hound Obvs people on here and esp crappy Twitter were going to be negative etc after the game, but I’m not totally sure what people were expecting. Suddenly start pinging the ball round like prime Barcelona and smashing every team we come across?

Same basic issues are there - lack of a suitable striker, too many poor and slow passes, conceding soft goals. LR not going to suddenly wave a magic wand and fix that

Truth is we dominated a side who have been on a fine run who had a very specific defensive gameplan - they had 1 shot on target and only 9 touches inside our penalty area. We weren’t amazing but created enough, KE had two very good chances, should have had a clear penalty and basically looked pretty solid.

Obvs work to be done but it was progress imo. Under Hunt the result may have been similar but even a team as poor as Donny had 8 shots on target and 23 touches in our area. We look a lot more solid and disciplined

Of course. It won’t stop the Richardson Out posts though.

The trolls have already started, and others quickly flock to them.

178 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Vision and 691 guests

It is currently 24 Nov 2025 15:21