by PieEater » 26 Aug 2006 17:40
by PieEater » 26 Aug 2006 17:43
by Melbguy » 26 Aug 2006 17:45
by PieEater » 26 Aug 2006 17:48
by Royal Lady » 26 Aug 2006 17:50
Harold Pathetic!
by cmonurz » 26 Aug 2006 17:52
PieEater I'm sure that stats will show we did OK on possession and shots, but only Lita's miss (or gitfaced Kirklands save) was the difference.
by southbank1871 » 26 Aug 2006 17:54
by shadesrwrf » 26 Aug 2006 17:58
Harold Pathetic!
by spickroyal » 26 Aug 2006 18:08
southbank1871 Far too generous there PieEater. Watched most of the game in the pub and thought, whilst we didn't disgrace ourselves, Wigan played us off the park. Lita could have snatched a point for us at the death, which would have been fantastic, but wholly undeserved. Wigan should have been home and dry by then.
Thought we actually looked slightly more dangerous once Oster and Hunt came on for Convey and Seol, but our lack of depth is again quite worrying. Sodje was OK, but at fault for the goal, and clearly not really ready for this level yet.
by EASTENDER MARKY » 26 Aug 2006 18:10
spickroyalsouthbank1871 Far too generous there PieEater. Watched most of the game in the pub and thought, whilst we didn't disgrace ourselves, Wigan played us off the park. Lita could have snatched a point for us at the death, which would have been fantastic, but wholly undeserved. Wigan should have been home and dry by then.
Thought we actually looked slightly more dangerous once Oster and Hunt came on for Convey and Seol, but our lack of depth is again quite worrying. Sodje was OK, but at fault for the goal, and clearly not really ready for this level yet.
Obviously we were watching a different game to those who made the trip then mate! Completely agree with the above assessment, we couldn't have complained if we had lost 3-0.
Onwards and upwards, lets look forward to the next game.
by retro royal » 26 Aug 2006 18:25
by From Despair To Where? » 26 Aug 2006 18:33
by PieEater » 26 Aug 2006 18:57
by Einstein agogo » 26 Aug 2006 19:05
PieEater I can't recall much football at all from Wigan apart from the odd bit at the start of the second. They battled harder than us and were well organised but we were by no means outplayed. How on earth did the stats count all those shots on target for Wigan. I counted 4, the goal, when they hit the post (if that counts) and two save from Marcus.
We did waste our corners, not one short corner got as far as the box.
by From Despair To Where? » 26 Aug 2006 19:06
by Gav » 26 Aug 2006 19:53
by RobRoyal » 26 Aug 2006 20:39
by 2.8 lita injection » 26 Aug 2006 20:43
by spickroyal » 26 Aug 2006 20:45
2.8 lita injection Reading started brightly but the more the game went the better Wigan looked, Reading has a little rally towards the end but Reading could had lost the game 3-0 on another day.
Apart from how poorly Harper & Convey performed today the biggest difference was Wigan were so much stronger & taller than the Reading team, Reading never looked like they were going to win many headers and hitting the ball high played into Wigans hands.
I thought Ingimarsson played well again, Sidwell was good & Doyles first touch is class.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Biscuit goalie, Clyde1998, Google Adsense [Bot], rabidbee, WestYorksRoyal, Who Moved The Goalposts?, Winchester Royal and 521 guests