


+1Muskrat wrote:In a word - abject. No creativity, no discernible shape, no pattern to our play. Same old story, 72% possession and 1 shot on target. People on here banging on about there being no plan B, how about getting plan A sorted out first eh? You know, the most frustrating thing is that the team last night were more than capable of winning that game if we'd had a different game plan. Flat back four, Williams and Kelly in CM, McCleary and Beerens as proper wingers and Swift in the Gylfi role just behind Kermogant and we would have appeared as a different team.
But no. Stam plays some utterly ridiculous formation with Obita and Gunter as"wing backs" even though neither is suited to that role, McCleary and Beerens narrow between the midfield and attack and Williams, for reasons that can only be known to himself, wide right. It was painfully obvious that the players just didn’t know what they were supposed to be doing!
And I'm sorry but to then come out after the game and imply that he hadn't been allowed to build a team when 5 of his signings played and another was left on the bench was frankly embarrassing.
He may be using us to cut his managerial teeth but we are the ones who are suffering.
I make it that the only one in the back 5 that was in a role he'd done before (at least for Reading) was Obita, playing left wing-back.biff wrote:+1Muskrat wrote:In a word - abject. No creativity, no discernible shape, no pattern to our play. Same old story, 72% possession and 1 shot on target. People on here banging on about there being no plan B, how about getting plan A sorted out first eh? You know, the most frustrating thing is that the team last night were more than capable of winning that game if we'd had a different game plan. Flat back four, Williams and Kelly in CM, McCleary and Beerens as proper wingers and Swift in the Gylfi role just behind Kermogant and we would have appeared as a different team.
But no. Stam plays some utterly ridiculous formation with Obita and Gunter as"wing backs" even though neither is suited to that role, McCleary and Beerens narrow between the midfield and attack and Williams, for reasons that can only be known to himself, wide right. It was painfully obvious that the players just didn’t know what they were supposed to be doing!
And I'm sorry but to then come out after the game and imply that he hadn't been allowed to build a team when 5 of his signings played and another was left on the bench was frankly embarrassing.
He may be using us to cut his managerial teeth but we are the ones who are suffering.
I think there has been far too much talk about the top two.tidus_mi2 wrote:Given the other results today, yesterday now feels like a lost opportunity more than it could have been a case of other teams catching up. Also lolBrighton for making a big fuss on us losing then losing themselves.
At no point did I ever think he was about to pose a serious threat on the QPR goal. The fact he 'looked a threat' was probably down to the fact that the rest were so p*ss poor!Hound wrote:Meite looked at threat certainly - would have put him on at half time
Ugh, seems instinctive to say it was yesterday, oxf*rd Sky and their Thursday games.genome wrote:Yeah guys, the game wasn't yesterday
Okay, so allowing for the fact that it was a Thursday night match. Where did that ever come from? TOTP's night back in the day. Mind you, enjoyed it when Middlesboro' had a cracking season in one of the Euro compos. And, invariably, always played on a Thursday night. Anyway moving on.....rank weather, on Sky, people trying to flog their tics, middle of Jan. and 5,000 having just forked out for a trip to Man U. Have a word with yourself Johnny.Jonathan Low, on getreading, wrote:
Yes it was cold and yes it was on television, but that's still no excuse.
Yep maybeRoyalBlue wrote:At no point did I ever think he was about to pose a serious threat on the QPR goal. The fact he 'looked a threat' was probably down to the fact that the rest were so p*ss poor!Hound wrote:Meite looked at threat certainly - would have put him on at half time
penisMuskrat wrote:He may be using us to cut his managerial teeth but we are the ones who are suffering.
From January last year...Muskrat wrote:In a word - abject. No creativity, no discernible shape, no pattern to our play. Same old story, 72% possession and 1 shot on target. People on here banging on about there being no plan B, how about getting plan A sorted out first eh? You know, the most frustrating thing is that the team last night were more than capable of winning that game if we'd had a different game plan. Flat back four, Williams and Kelly in CM, McCleary and Beerens as proper wingers and Swift in the Gylfi role just behind Kermogant and we would have appeared as a different team.
But no. Stam plays some utterly ridiculous formation with Obita and Gunter as"wing backs" even though neither is suited to that role, McCleary and Beerens narrow between the midfield and attack and Williams, for reasons that can only be known to himself, wide right. It was painfully obvious that the players just didn’t know what they were supposed to be doing!
And I'm sorry but to then come out after the game and imply that he hadn't been allowed to build a team when 5 of his signings played and another was left on the bench was frankly embarrassing.
He may be using us to cut his managerial teeth but we are the ones who are suffering.
genome wrote:Deary me, have you actually just cherry picked a shit performance from a season we finished 3rd?
That may be the worst "I told you so" I've ever seen
Yeah, but you said we were shit and we finished 3rd. You can't say you were right when you were categorically proven wrong. Oh... you have. Well, hang your own credibility I guess.Muskrat wrote:No, there were loads of sh1t performances that I could have chosen from, from the first game at home to PNE, up to and including the play-off final. The fact is I saw what others chose not to, that we have been shit for at least a year now.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 243 guests