Ince set us out to time waste for a draw from minute 1. We mostly defended resolutely and had a few nearly chances from Sunderland errors but created nothing. Sunderland were bang average. The difference was Roberts always scores against us.Millsy wrote:Sorry guys completely missed the game.
Bftg or ratings and summary please someone?
This +1 We had been defending well for most of the game!! So why change it with 7 minutes left.....this totally lost us the game.Snowflake Royal wrote:Ince set us out to time waste for a draw from minute 1. We mostly defended resolutely and had a few nearly chances from Sunderland errors but created nothing. Sunderland were bang average. The difference was Roberts always scores against us.Millsy wrote:Sorry guys completely missed the game.
Bftg or ratings and summary please someone?
Lumley - 7 not tested many times, but pulled off one double / triple save - although if he'd pushed it safe rather than straight at a Sunderland player it wouldn’t have needed to be a double / triple.
Hoilett - 6 ok, but not as good as his last performance
Rahman - 3 can't cross for toffee, shouldn't be playing, or even at the club, cost us the game with a moment of sheer idiocy trying to stop dead and pirouette on his own 6 yard line rather than just bloody clear his lines
Yiadom - 7 good display
Sarr - 5 protected well by McIntyre whilst in the middle of the three but exposed once at left, just not very good.
Mbengue - 8 I was wrong, his pace is a real asset, he can pass and he's picked up positioning and anticipation really well
Hendrick - 5 vanished at HT, so much of the game passes him by sometimes.
McIntyre - 7 don't like him in midfield but first half he was excellent, second bypassed.
Ince - 6 didn’t really happen for him, shooting and crossing wasn't great
Long - 6 ran a lot, but our final touch/ pass was poor
Carroll - 6 won headers but they rarely find someone.
Dann - 5 his introduction was pointless and caused 3/4ers of the remaining defence to switch position to accommodate him. Mbengue would have covered Rahman where Sarr was beaten which led to Rahman's moment of idiocy.
Meite - 5 can't play striker effectively. Especially when we don’t try to create anything and have only 16 minutes to play.
Fornah and someone else I think... n/a. Damage already done by playing for a draw rather than trying to win, an unnecessary bad sub and a moment of sheer stupidity from Rahman.
Unless you can say Rahman doesn't have his braindead moment with Dann still on the bench then it really didn't. Not a change that I think was needed mind.Crowbar6753 wrote:This +1 We had been defending well for most of the game!! So why change it with 7 minutes left.....this totally lost us the game.Snowflake Royal wrote:Ince set us out to time waste for a draw from minute 1. We mostly defended resolutely and had a few nearly chances from Sunderland errors but created nothing. Sunderland were bang average. The difference was Roberts always scores against us.Millsy wrote:Sorry guys completely missed the game.
Bftg or ratings and summary please someone?
Lumley - 7 not tested many times, but pulled off one double / triple save - although if he'd pushed it safe rather than straight at a Sunderland player it wouldn’t have needed to be a double / triple.
Hoilett - 6 ok, but not as good as his last performance
Rahman - 3 can't cross for toffee, shouldn't be playing, or even at the club, cost us the game with a moment of sheer idiocy trying to stop dead and pirouette on his own 6 yard line rather than just bloody clear his lines
Yiadom - 7 good display
Sarr - 5 protected well by McIntyre whilst in the middle of the three but exposed once at left, just not very good.
Mbengue - 8 I was wrong, his pace is a real asset, he can pass and he's picked up positioning and anticipation really well
Hendrick - 5 vanished at HT, so much of the game passes him by sometimes.
McIntyre - 7 don't like him in midfield but first half he was excellent, second bypassed.
Ince - 6 didn’t really happen for him, shooting and crossing wasn't great
Long - 6 ran a lot, but our final touch/ pass was poor
Carroll - 6 won headers but they rarely find someone.
Dann - 5 his introduction was pointless and caused 3/4ers of the remaining defence to switch position to accommodate him. Mbengue would have covered Rahman where Sarr was beaten which led to Rahman's moment of idiocy.
Meite - 5 can't play striker effectively. Especially when we don’t try to create anything and have only 16 minutes to play.
Fornah and someone else I think... n/a. Damage already done by playing for a draw rather than trying to win, an unnecessary bad sub and a moment of sheer stupidity from Rahman.
I can. Because Mbengue covered him all game and that came about because Sarr got done like the slow awkward giant he is trying to cover him. With Mbengue there the ball never finds its way back to Rahman for him to oxf*rd it up.Stranded wrote:Unless you can say Rahman doesn't have his braindead moment with Dann still on the bench then it really didn't. Not a change that I think was needed mind.Crowbar6753 wrote:This +1 We had been defending well for most of the game!! So why change it with 7 minutes left.....this totally lost us the game.Snowflake Royal wrote: Ince set us out to time waste for a draw from minute 1. We mostly defended resolutely and had a few nearly chances from Sunderland errors but created nothing. Sunderland were bang average. The difference was Roberts always scores against us.
Lumley - 7 not tested many times, but pulled off one double / triple save - although if he'd pushed it safe rather than straight at a Sunderland player it wouldn’t have needed to be a double / triple.
Hoilett - 6 ok, but not as good as his last performance
Rahman - 3 can't cross for toffee, shouldn't be playing, or even at the club, cost us the game with a moment of sheer idiocy trying to stop dead and pirouette on his own 6 yard line rather than just bloody clear his lines
Yiadom - 7 good display
Sarr - 5 protected well by McIntyre whilst in the middle of the three but exposed once at left, just not very good.
Mbengue - 8 I was wrong, his pace is a real asset, he can pass and he's picked up positioning and anticipation really well
Hendrick - 5 vanished at HT, so much of the game passes him by sometimes.
McIntyre - 7 don't like him in midfield but first half he was excellent, second bypassed.
Ince - 6 didn’t really happen for him, shooting and crossing wasn't great
Long - 6 ran a lot, but our final touch/ pass was poor
Carroll - 6 won headers but they rarely find someone.
Dann - 5 his introduction was pointless and caused 3/4ers of the remaining defence to switch position to accommodate him. Mbengue would have covered Rahman where Sarr was beaten which led to Rahman's moment of idiocy.
Meite - 5 can't play striker effectively. Especially when we don’t try to create anything and have only 16 minutes to play.
Fornah and someone else I think... n/a. Damage already done by playing for a draw rather than trying to win, an unnecessary bad sub and a moment of sheer stupidity from Rahman.
He did not have a good game. Mbengue bailed him out several times when beaten and his crossing was once again dreadful.Kitsondinho wrote:Great to see Baba getting slated, when he had a decent game until the mistake. Also good to see we are back to Ince OUT! again. We were 7 mins away from a very well earnt point. Too many people are reacting to our overall performances away fron home than what actually happened yesterday. Still, I’m sure if we win a few of the next 4, we’ll suddenly be nailed on for the play-offs again. Ince probably isn’t the long term option to take us forward…but he is currently doing exactly what is expected of him. That is all we need right now.
He was perfectly decent until that point from my viewpoint in the SoL North Stand. Yes, he should be called out for the mistake…but too much of it has been ‘he was awful all game’, which he wasn’t. Same with Scott Dann getting stick for being on the pitch when they scored. The goal was nothing to do with him.Snowflake Royal wrote:He did not have a good game. Mbengue bailed him out several times when beaten and his crossing was once again dreadful.Kitsondinho wrote:Great to see Baba getting slated, when he had a decent game until the mistake. Also good to see we are back to Ince OUT! again. We were 7 mins away from a very well earnt point. Too many people are reacting to our overall performances away fron home than what actually happened yesterday. Still, I’m sure if we win a few of the next 4, we’ll suddenly be nailed on for the play-offs again. Ince probably isn’t the long term option to take us forward…but he is currently doing exactly what is expected of him. That is all we need right now.
And even if he did, when you gift the oppositio a stupid goal from a completely braindead error to lose the game, you deserve to get pilloried. Mick was right, no experienced professional footballer should make that mistake.
Exactly this! A couple of wins in the next 3 and we are all but safe. This season is about getting to May still in the Championship. I’m confident that will happen. Where we go from there is the big question. I like P Ince, he has done the required job…but I do doubt if he is going to take us beyond staying in the division each year. I would like him to stay on working with Bowen though, as they seem to have really begun to sort the behind the scenes mess…just not sure I want him in the dugout beyond 2023.South Coast Royal wrote:From what I remember the ball somehow ended up on Rahman's right foot and he being one of many players who are only one-footed just couldn't clear the ball with his right.
A dreadful game to watch but I am with Kitsondinho in believing that generally Rahman was no worse than he normally is and we really are not that good at the back to play for 0-0s (joint 2nd worst defensive record in the division).
I disagree with the earlier poster who said that we have a good set of players-we have Tom Ince and............................................
There is no Olise, nor Swift nor the year younger Joao and it is a lower Championship squad..
Everything is about survival and fair judgement can only be made next season when Ince hopefully has the funds to build a team-at the moment IMHO he may not be doing brilliantly but he is likely to do what was asked of him, for us to stay up.
I would like to think that Ince and Rae both having been all-rounder midfield players (in days when midfielders did the lot and not defined as attacking, holding, defensive, creative, playmaker etc) they would , funds permitting, be looking to bring in those types to the engine room.Kitsondinho wrote:Exactly this! A couple of wins in the next 3 and we are all but safe. This season is about getting to May still in the Championship. I’m confident that will happen. Where we go from there is the big question. I like P Ince, he has done the required job…but I do doubt if he is going to take us beyond staying in the division each year. I would like him to stay on working with Bowen though, as they seem to have really begun to sort the behind the scenes mess…just not sure I want him in the dugout beyond 2023.South Coast Royal wrote:From what I remember the ball somehow ended up on Rahman's right foot and he being one of many players who are only one-footed just couldn't clear the ball with his right.
A dreadful game to watch but I am with Kitsondinho in believing that generally Rahman was no worse than he normally is and we really are not that good at the back to play for 0-0s (joint 2nd worst defensive record in the division).
I disagree with the earlier poster who said that we have a good set of players-we have Tom Ince and............................................
There is no Olise, nor Swift nor the year younger Joao and it is a lower Championship squad..
Everything is about survival and fair judgement can only be made next season when Ince hopefully has the funds to build a team-at the moment IMHO he may not be doing brilliantly but he is likely to do what was asked of him, for us to stay up.
I’m not against giving him a chance, as you say, he has earned it. However, if it doesn’t start well, then we are back to square one again. I suppose I just want to break the 18 month hero, average, getting worried, gotta go, sacked cycle we have with managers these days.South Coast Royal wrote:I would like to think that Ince and Rae both having been all-rounder midfield players (in days when midfielders did the lot and not defined as attacking, holding, defensive, creative, playmaker etc) they would , funds permitting, be looking to bring in those types to the engine room.Kitsondinho wrote:Exactly this! A couple of wins in the next 3 and we are all but safe. This season is about getting to May still in the Championship. I’m confident that will happen. Where we go from there is the big question. I like P Ince, he has done the required job…but I do doubt if he is going to take us beyond staying in the division each year. I would like him to stay on working with Bowen though, as they seem to have really begun to sort the behind the scenes mess…just not sure I want him in the dugout beyond 2023.South Coast Royal wrote:From what I remember the ball somehow ended up on Rahman's right foot and he being one of many players who are only one-footed just couldn't clear the ball with his right.
A dreadful game to watch but I am with Kitsondinho in believing that generally Rahman was no worse than he normally is and we really are not that good at the back to play for 0-0s (joint 2nd worst defensive record in the division).
I disagree with the earlier poster who said that we have a good set of players-we have Tom Ince and............................................
There is no Olise, nor Swift nor the year younger Joao and it is a lower Championship squad..
Everything is about survival and fair judgement can only be made next season when Ince hopefully has the funds to build a team-at the moment IMHO he may not be doing brilliantly but he is likely to do what was asked of him, for us to stay up.
Then we wouldn't be knocking hopeful balls up to a striker with nobody in support and may have a style of play, something that we don't really have with this mish-mash collection of players.
Keep us up and he surely deserves a chance-I would hate to have had to manage this lot, a mixture of crocks, has-beens and inexperienced thrown together to fill gaps rather than to create a team.
I wouldn't trust Paul Ince with a penny in the summer. He's shown to be a limited tactician so far. A strong end to the season and I may rethink this. But I don't see him making us a top half team or one that challenges for the playoffs. More likely we'll spend money and be down the bottom of the league again.South Coast Royal wrote:From what I remember the ball somehow ended up on Rahman's right foot and he being one of many players who are only one-footed just couldn't clear the ball with his right.
A dreadful game to watch but I am with Kitsondinho in believing that generally Rahman was no worse than he normally is and we really are not that good at the back to play for 0-0s (joint 2nd worst defensive record in the division).
I disagree with the earlier poster who said that we have a good set of players-we have Tom Ince and............................................
There is no Olise, nor Swift nor the year younger Joao and it is a lower Championship squad..
Everything is about survival and fair judgement can only be made next season when Ince hopefully has the funds to build a team-at the moment IMHO he may not be doing brilliantly but he is likely to do what was asked of him, for us to stay up.
But aren't all managers ludicrously defensive and protective when it comes to their teams?Snowflake Royal wrote:Ince has had a poor reaction to the questions of BBC North East journo at the game. Its a pretty embarrassing transcript.
The reporter's got a Mackem chip on his shoulder the size of a mountain, but you dont get pissy. And trying to pretend we weren't negative and timewasting from the very start when it was so obvious is just a bit tragic. Own it.
Think the pressure is getting to him.
You don’t need to get pissy to do it, you can stay professional and answer the questions. You're representing the club to the media and public.South Coast Royal wrote:But aren't all managers ludicrously defensive and protective when it comes to their teams?Snowflake Royal wrote:Ince has had a poor reaction to the questions of BBC North East journo at the game. Its a pretty embarrassing transcript.
The reporter's got a Mackem chip on his shoulder the size of a mountain, but you dont get pissy. And trying to pretend we weren't negative and timewasting from the very start when it was so obvious is just a bit tragic. Own it.
Think the pressure is getting to him.
I don’t think either did anything wrong. Journo’s question was fair and Ince’s reaction was fine to me. What did they expect him to say, sorry we didn’t play 0-6-4 and lose 8-0…?!?South Coast Royal wrote:But aren't all managers ludicrously defensive and protective when it comes to their teams?Snowflake Royal wrote:Ince has had a poor reaction to the questions of BBC North East journo at the game. Its a pretty embarrassing transcript.
The reporter's got a Mackem chip on his shoulder the size of a mountain, but you dont get pissy. And trying to pretend we weren't negative and timewasting from the very start when it was so obvious is just a bit tragic. Own it.
Think the pressure is getting to him.
Also, although Rahman committed the main error, Dann was also partly at fault. Firstly, he stopped dead as the move developed and was then caught on his heels. Secondly, he then dived in with an attempted challenge rather than staying on his feet. This enabled Roberts to skip past his now prone body and shoot.Crowbar6753 wrote:This +1 We had been defending well for most of the game!! So why change it with 7 minutes left.....this totally lost us the game.Snowflake Royal wrote:Ince set us out to time waste for a draw from minute 1. We mostly defended resolutely and had a few nearly chances from Sunderland errors but created nothing. Sunderland were bang average. The difference was Roberts always scores against us.Millsy wrote:Sorry guys completely missed the game.
Bftg or ratings and summary please someone?
Lumley - 7 not tested many times, but pulled off one double / triple save - although if he'd pushed it safe rather than straight at a Sunderland player it wouldn’t have needed to be a double / triple.
Hoilett - 6 ok, but not as good as his last performance
Rahman - 3 can't cross for toffee, shouldn't be playing, or even at the club, cost us the game with a moment of sheer idiocy trying to stop dead and pirouette on his own 6 yard line rather than just bloody clear his lines
Yiadom - 7 good display
Sarr - 5 protected well by McIntyre whilst in the middle of the three but exposed once at left, just not very good.
Mbengue - 8 I was wrong, his pace is a real asset, he can pass and he's picked up positioning and anticipation really well
Hendrick - 5 vanished at HT, so much of the game passes him by sometimes.
McIntyre - 7 don't like him in midfield but first half he was excellent, second bypassed.
Ince - 6 didn’t really happen for him, shooting and crossing wasn't great
Long - 6 ran a lot, but our final touch/ pass was poor
Carroll - 6 won headers but they rarely find someone.
Dann - 5 his introduction was pointless and caused 3/4ers of the remaining defence to switch position to accommodate him. Mbengue would have covered Rahman where Sarr was beaten which led to Rahman's moment of idiocy.
Meite - 5 can't play striker effectively. Especially when we don’t try to create anything and have only 16 minutes to play.
Fornah and someone else I think... n/a. Damage already done by playing for a draw rather than trying to win, an unnecessary bad sub and a moment of sheer stupidity from Rahman.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bazzaballs, Bing [Bot], Houlton11, RG30, WestYorksRoyal and 140 guests