Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Eh - probs one of our better performances.Sutekh wrote:Might be winning but the performance is poor.
Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Eh - probs one of our better performances.Sutekh wrote:Might be winning but the performance is poor.
Why?Brogue wrote:Don’t like the sleeves on our shirt
Tbf a fair few of our goals are nicking it off a defender. Good pressing and taking advantage of some crappy defendingSnowflake Royal wrote:Would be nice to create a goal rather than be given a comedy one though.
Need something to moan about don’t we?Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Why?Brogue wrote:Don’t like the sleeves on our shirt
Snowflake Royal wrote:Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Eh - probs one of our better performances.Sutekh wrote:Might be winning but the performance is poor.
Not a patch on Wigan or Birmingham imo, both better sides than BurtonJagermesiter1871 wrote:Snowflake Royal wrote:Jagermesiter1871 wrote: Eh - probs one of our better performances.
Played some nice stuff first half. 2nd half is completely over.
Better than Huddersfield, LO, Bolton, Wrexham.
true.Snowflake Royal wrote:I just don't see how he can play well.Brogue wrote:He did an interview earlier in the season where he said that all this takeover stuff had really affected him. And he hasn’t been in a good head space. Maybe he’s just not mentally there at the momentWestYorksRoyal wrote: He finished last season strongly. It's so far this season things have changed. Perhaps he had better chemistry with Azeez, or Knibbs is deeper. I'm not one of these tactical deep divers.
We use him for long out balls, but he's up against a couple of big CBs usually. He's not going to win many headers. He's not going to hold off beasts like that to comfortably chest or lay off. We're not really looking to release him into the channels or with through balls. He's essentially just there to be a nuisance and maybe turn in a corner or freekick.

Definitely wouldn't disagree. Would still say it's one of our better performances as opposed to poor.Snowflake Royal wrote:Not a patch on Wigan or Birmingham imo, both better sides than BurtonJagermesiter1871 wrote:Snowflake Royal wrote:
Played some nice stuff first half. 2nd half is completely over.
Better than Huddersfield, LO, Bolton, Wrexham.
Cramp?stealthpapes wrote:Garcia injured.
Pulled up during their goal. It didn’t look seriousJagermesiter1871 wrote:Cramp?stealthpapes wrote:Garcia injured.
Oh and Charlton. But yeah, it's just a job done performance, not terrible, not greatJagermesiter1871 wrote:Definitely wouldn't disagree. Would still say it's one of our better performances as opposed to poor.Snowflake Royal wrote:Not a patch on Wigan or Birmingham imo, both better sides than BurtonJagermesiter1871 wrote:
Played some nice stuff first half. 2nd half is completely over.
Better than Huddersfield, LO, Bolton, Wrexham.
Routine and slightly dull. And that’s fineJagermesiter1871 wrote:Definitely wouldn't disagree. Would still say it's one of our better performances as opposed to poor.Snowflake Royal wrote:Not a patch on Wigan or Birmingham imo, both better sides than BurtonJagermesiter1871 wrote:
Played some nice stuff first half. 2nd half is completely over.
Better than Huddersfield, LO, Bolton, Wrexham.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 217 guests