We were interested, but we would never have paid the money required to get the players.Ian Royal wrote:Jay doesn't believe we were after Lescott or Brown. The bids were too high for us to have made.
Saying only that we struggled to attract 'top' players when we were Premier League. Writing off a young and promising kid that could well go on a season long loan next season, when we will still struggle to get players of a certain quality, is daft.SCIAG wrote:Are you saying that Welbeck, a player you have only heard of since he scored for Man United, is the best striker we could possibly sign in the event of promotion? Jay, I knew you had a reputation for basing your opinions on very little, but ffs!Deathy wrote:Yeah right!! Reading, a club that struggled to attract players when in the Premier League, and you think we can do better and possibly get better than Welbeck?SCIAG wrote: If we went up, I genuinely don't think any United youngsters would do us good.
Maybe Welbeck, but we can do better, and permanently.
ALOL.
I'm never sure of the point of comments like that when there is clear evidence that proves them to be wrong.Deathy wrote:We were interested, but we would never have paid the money required to get the players.Ian Royal wrote:Jay doesn't believe we were after Lescott or Brown. The bids were too high for us to have made.
Take your head out the fish bowl.
Sun Tzu wrote:I'm never sure of the point of comments like that when there is clear evidence that proves them to be wrong.Deathy wrote:We were interested, but we would never have paid the money required to get the players.Ian Royal wrote:Jay doesn't believe we were after Lescott or Brown. The bids were too high for us to have made.
Take your head out the fish bowl.
You may as well claim we'll never sign a Czech international or have 4 players in the Ireland team....
No. We were only mucking about....Ian Royal wrote:So we were prepared to pay the money to get him then?
No wonder he doesn't like us.Sun Tzu wrote:No. We were only mucking about....Ian Royal wrote:So we were prepared to pay the money to get him then?
Yes - even Hammond made reference to it at the time - Bet Sir Mad is thanking his lucky stars that Brown saw us as a small club - saved him almost enough for him to buy his Degan piece instead!Ian Royal wrote:No wonder he doesn't like us.Sun Tzu wrote:No. We were only mucking about....Ian Royal wrote:So we were prepared to pay the money to get him then?
and just to confirm look at this link and you will see for yourself - http://www.readingfc.co.uk/page/NewsDet ... 55,00.htmlIan Royal wrote:So we were prepared to pay the money to get him then?
Ian Royal wrote:Degas, which was bought years before we made a bid for Brown.
Whatever way you look at it - all the money is signed off by Sir Mad and in 2004 he would have still been putting his own money in, so does it really matter - any funds would have been from Sir MadSun Tzu wrote:I didn't realise that RFC bought the Degas statue ?
Or that JM would have bought Scott Brown ?
Some confusion here I think....
IMAMATEOFJOVSKY wrote:Ian Royal wrote:Degas, which was bought years before we made a bid for Brown.
Think you will find it was bought in 2004 - not sure what month and how this ties into Brown transfer...but yet again proving yourself to be a right COCK!
Well its just to just make the supposed "font of all RFC knowledge" know that he isnt right all the timeRoyal Lady wrote:IMAMATEOFJOVSKY wrote:Ian Royal wrote:Degas, which was bought years before we made a bid for Brown.
Think you will find it was bought in 2004 - not sure what month and how this ties into Brown transfer...but yet again proving yourself to be a right COCK!oooh!
ooo touchy aren't we.IMAMATEOFJOVSKY wrote:Ian Royal wrote:Degas, which was bought years before we made a bid for Brown.
Think you will find it was bought in 2004 - not sure what month and how this ties into Brown transfer...but yet again proving yourself to be a right COCK!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests