This is a shocking turn of events!Zip wrote:Graham Potter is a very good manager. They were impressive. Found it hard to watch though. Ejaria has to do better. He could so easily have been punished for giving the ball away in dangerous positions.Hound wrote:Do agree the passing wasn’t good enough yesterday. Ovie was poor and kept losing it, Fornah had a poor game. Yiadom and Ince struggled to retain it. Thought Hendrick improved as it went and Hoilett did well
But that’s great prep for playing a poorer standard next week. Not too worried by it really
No problem with genuine utility players like Hutch. Can play CB and DM.Zip wrote:Left footed. Don’t listen to master Royal. You cannot take someone seriously when they are usually dressed head to toe in orange with “Lib Dems” on the front of his shirt and “winning here” on the back.NewCorkSeth wrote:Is Sarr right or left footed? We seem to be building a lot of similarly positioned players and I can already hear Ian saying something about square pegs and round holes.Zip wrote:
If Sarr signs I’m guessing he will move to cdm. A tough tackler and organiser who will hopefully be more influential than Van Den Berg.
Just give him hell Sethmondo.
Well it’s Ovie time or bust for him this season. Always liked him but he cannot flatter to deceive this season because the other ten options are not great.Snowflake Royal wrote:This is a shocking turn of events!Zip wrote:Graham Potter is a very good manager. They were impressive. Found it hard to watch though. Ejaria has to do better. He could so easily have been punished for giving the ball away in dangerous positions.Hound wrote:Do agree the passing wasn’t good enough yesterday. Ovie was poor and kept losing it, Fornah had a poor game. Yiadom and Ince struggled to retain it. Thought Hendrick improved as it went and Hoilett did well
But that’s great prep for playing a poorer standard next week. Not too worried by it really
Agree on Azeez. Bags of promise there. Clarke would fit as back up or on loan for me. Feel like maybe Melvin-Lambert could benefit with the back up experience this season and then a L1 loan next with Clarke going out this. Dunno.Hound wrote:Azeez we need. Two of the others can go. Clarke does score goals at u23, think he’s perfectly adequate 4th choice when we’ll often play one up top anyway imoSnowflake Royal wrote:Yeah, depending on how we play. Think Hoilett could get a fair few assists crossing from the right. Ince has the potential.Zip wrote:
We could possibly play Azeez upfront too. Would much prefer a focus on another ten. There isn’t much creativity in central midfield now that we have lost Swift and Olise.
We've got quite a lot of strikers... too many who are better elsewhere or very early in their career to take a full role though.
One or or maybe two of Azeez, Melvin-Lambert, Clarke and Ehibhatiomhan should probably go out on loan for the experience.
If we get another striker, they need to be one we can be confident can play a lot of games, in which case I think it makes Long rather redundant.
But if Long or Joao are injured then can use the loan there I reckon. Aware Grabban is a free not a loan, would have been a terrible use of a loan if he wasn’t
Ejaria, Ince, Hoilett, Hendrick can all play that ten role if that’s how we choose to play it. But if a good option became available then fair enough
On the basis Puscas will leave and M-L, Clarke and Ehib are not close to being first team starting material I think my numbers are accurate.Snowflake Royal wrote:Joao, Puscas, Long, Clarke, Melvin-Lambert, Meite, Ehibhatiomhan and Azeez are all either strikers, or can play there. That's at least six, potentially up to 8.Nameless wrote:I don’t think 3 strikers plus Meite is in any way excessive.Snowflake Royal wrote: Yeah, depending on how we play. Think Hoilett could get a fair few assists crossing from the right. Ince has the potential.
We've got quite a lot of strikers... too many who are better elsewhere or very early in their career to take a full role though.
One or or maybe two of Azeez, Melvin-Lambert, Clarke and Ehibhatiomhan should probably go out on loan for the experience.
If we get another striker, they need to be one we can be confident can play a lot of games, in which case I think it makes Long rather redundant.
I thought you wanted me to put you on ignore, but about 12 hours later you're talking to me and quoting me.
Disappointed I missed the game.Hound wrote:Suprised Carroll hasn’t been mentioned at all in rumours. Do wonder if something behind the scenes took place as you’d think it’d have been an obvious one to Go back to on paper
Ejaria did improve and there were some good signs in there. But Brighton we’re right onto him - minute he got the ball there were two on him and tbf he received the ball a number of times it a difficult situation and he didn’t have the ability to get out of them. Poor game from him but again not too worried generally. He did put in some good defensive work again
At the risk of being told off I knowCarroll loved his time here. He would happily have stayed but WBA could pay him much more. If there was a choice between him or Grabban I’d probably opt for Grabban but both might be wanting more than we could pay. I’d probably prefer someone different in style but we’re picking from what’savailable.Hound wrote:Suprised Carroll hasn’t been mentioned at all in rumours. Do wonder if something behind the scenes took place as you’d think it’d have been an obvious one to Go back to on paper
Ejaria did improve and there were some good signs in there. But Brighton we’re right onto him - minute he got the ball there were two on him and tbf he received the ball a number of times it a difficult situation and he didn’t have the ability to get out of them. Poor game from him but again not too worried generally. He did put in some good defensive work again
Failing a medical in Belgium possibly a factor ?Hound wrote:I got the impression he did enjoy his time which makes it all the more surprising to me he hasn’t been mentioned as coming back.
I did see a post the other day about a few free agents still available that we could sign and both Carroll and Drinkwater were mentioned. It wasn't so much a rumour, more of just what is available that could prove useful this season.Hound wrote:I got the impression he did enjoy his time which makes it all the more surprising to me he hasn’t been mentioned as coming back.
I don't think that the EFL have capped our overall wage bill for this season - they're aware that we are effectively at the mercy of whether our high-wage players leave or not. They've simply restricted the weekly wages of any new signings, banned us from paying a fee and put a limit on the total number of players we can have in the squad. I guess that the amount we lose this season could impact what we have to spend next season, but the EFL might just be happy to see our wage bills falling to a certain level by then.3points wrote:I'm still convinced both Joao and Puscas will leave on the basis I think we needed to shift 2 out of Moore, Joao and Puscas to get underneath this season's wage cap. As Moore isn't going anywhere due to injury then we may not have any options. I also think it was the reason Meite started up front against Brighton, as that's Ince's plan A without Joao.
If my hypothesis is correct then e're likely to need another striker as it seems that Shane will have injury issues throughout the season and the likes of Clarke, etc are not ready for regular starting time.
Loan move for Danny Loader anyone?
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Farnham Royal, Houlton11, Majestic-12 [Bot], RG30, Richard, WestYorksRoyal and 150 guests