UkeSchards#2Uke Just because the club has money, doesn't mean they have to spend it.
Adkins could not have made it clearer that he wanted Sharp and that we didn't get him, even on loan, because he's hamstrung on finances. Do you think he's making it up? And if so why?
No intentional lies from any side, why do people always think there are lies? There are many half-truths though.
Just because the club has money and Adkins wants to spend it, doesn't mean they have to spend it.
Business decision, the club will have to live with it. On balance, I think it is probably a good one as Sharp wasn't the new Messiah the UR&G board had suggested
No intentional lies? Dellor twice asked him and Madejski twice told him funding would be available. If he wasn't sure that the funding was going to be there, then he should have qualified his statement. If not a lie, a broken pledge.