And it really did come out of absolute nowhere, I think it was a shock to everyone.genome wrote:Even then the 106 season will be more special, because it was the first time.
This post is a thing of beauty. Every poster should print, frame and hang this from the most prominent position in their household.The Goat was fed wrote:I'm desperately trying to find it, but about five years ago I posted a post/tirade at a fan who accused Brian McDermott's title winning team of playing "boring, soulless football" - it was about the time everyone started getting moist about Barcelona/La Liga.
We now play that style of football, admittedly not quite with the same talent(!), and you still get the same old faces moaning. I have a guy behind me whose favourite Marcus Hahnemann/Sonko shout was "for God's sake, throw/pass it out", I'm sure you can guess his favourite shout now for Al-Habsi and co is "for God's sake, get it forward."
The 20/20 test match comparison was pretty close to nailing this odd phenomenon. Personally, if Reading are winning, I'm entertained. I get the same enjoyment watching Alistair Cook grind out a dirty century with the only three shots he has in his repertoire than I do out of Joe Root getting a beauty with his run-a-ball, all the shots style. That's because if those things happen, England are probably on their way to a win.
As for the Mighty Royals, I like the way we're playing at the moment, but can understand how it can frustrate (Snob Mode: Less educated) fans. I loved the way we played under B-Mac because it was so full of graft and about being a team (our banks of four that season were unreal, Jimmy Kebe running 40 yards to stop a cross at West Ham sticks in my mind as the defining 'I love this team' moment), I loved the way we played under Coppell because it was so quick and direct. Don't let anyone tell you we played pretty football that season, it was blitz football. All three - at the moment - have one thing in common, winning football...and that's fine by me.
Oh stop it.handbags_harris wrote:This post is a thing of beauty. Every poster should print, frame and hang this from the most prominent position in their household.The Goat was fed wrote:I'm desperately trying to find it, but about five years ago I posted a post/tirade at a fan who accused Brian McDermott's title winning team of playing "boring, soulless football" - it was about the time everyone started getting moist about Barcelona/La Liga.
We now play that style of football, admittedly not quite with the same talent(!), and you still get the same old faces moaning. I have a guy behind me whose favourite Marcus Hahnemann/Sonko shout was "for God's sake, throw/pass it out", I'm sure you can guess his favourite shout now for Al-Habsi and co is "for God's sake, get it forward."
The 20/20 test match comparison was pretty close to nailing this odd phenomenon. Personally, if Reading are winning, I'm entertained. I get the same enjoyment watching Alistair Cook grind out a dirty century with the only three shots he has in his repertoire than I do out of Joe Root getting a beauty with his run-a-ball, all the shots style. That's because if those things happen, England are probably on their way to a win.
As for the Mighty Royals, I like the way we're playing at the moment, but can understand how it can frustrate (Snob Mode: Less educated) fans. I loved the way we played under B-Mac because it was so full of graft and about being a team (our banks of four that season were unreal, Jimmy Kebe running 40 yards to stop a cross at West Ham sticks in my mind as the defining 'I love this team' moment), I loved the way we played under Coppell because it was so quick and direct. Don't let anyone tell you we played pretty football that season, it was blitz football. All three - at the moment - have one thing in common, winning football...and that's fine by me.
![]()
![]()
APPLAUSE
![]()
![]()
It's more of a quote than a screenshot but do go on....Muskrat wrote:People will of course have their blinkers on because it was a "comfortable" 3-0 win and we're (somehow) third in the league. I'd get a screenshot now if I were you guys because next week when Brizzle and their 3,000 fans roll into town I feel a big reality check coming our way
Well hopefully we get many more of your reality checks, because they'll see us pick up loads more points if this was exactly what you were talking about.Muskrat wrote:Sure no problem. I wasn't able to get to the game but listened on the radio and it sounded like we got exactly what I predicted, a reality check. Loads of posters who went to the game have said that Brizzle were unlucky not to have got something from the game and pretty much bossed the second half. Also I've had a close look at the video footage now and definitely not a penalty for me plus it seems that they should have been awarded one when Harriott handled the ball in the box (no video of that). So yeah I think I was pretty much spot on.
Well said.Nameless wrote:Not sure how beating a decent Bristol side is a 'reality check'.
The reality that we all recognise is that a team that is still a work in progress is producing excellent results. Performances are patchy, we range from really very good to a bit shaky but the character the team has developed is carrying us through the shaky bits.
Our reality is currently somewhat better than the reality of almost every other team in the division, that's how you judge these things.
Muskrat wrote:Sure no problem. I wasn't able to get to the game but listened on the radio and it sounded like we got exactly what I predicted, a reality check. Loads of posters who went to the game have said that Brizzle were unlucky not to have got something from the game and pretty much bossed the second half. Also I've had a close look at the video footage now and definitely not a penalty for me plus it seems that they should have been awarded one when Harriott handled the ball in the box (no video of that). So yeah I think I was pretty much spot on.

+1 I'll take a "reality check" like that every week please.Ian Royal wrote:Well hopefully we get many more of your reality checks, because they'll see us pick up loads more points if this was exactly what you were talking about.Muskrat wrote:Sure no problem. I wasn't able to get to the game but listened on the radio and it sounded like we got exactly what I predicted, a reality check. Loads of posters who went to the game have said that Brizzle were unlucky not to have got something from the game and pretty much bossed the second half. Also I've had a close look at the video footage now and definitely not a penalty for me plus it seems that they should have been awarded one when Harriott handled the ball in the box (no video of that). So yeah I think I was pretty much spot on.
Muskrat wrote:Sure no problem. I wasn't able to get to the game but listened on the radio and it sounded like we got exactly what I predicted, a reality check. Loads of posters who went to the game have said that Brizzle were unlucky not to have got something from the game and pretty much bossed the second half. Also I've had a close look at the video footage now and definitely not a penalty for me plus it seems that they should have been awarded one when Harriott handled the ball in the box (no video of that). So yeah I think I was pretty much spot on.

That's so funny because after reading that cracking (absolute bollocks) post from Muskrat I was going to post the same pic. Need to go and find another one nowManeki Neko wrote:Muskrat wrote:Sure no problem. I wasn't able to get to the game but listened on the radio and it sounded like we got exactly what I predicted, a reality check. Loads of posters who went to the game have said that Brizzle were unlucky not to have got something from the game and pretty much bossed the second half. Also I've had a close look at the video footage now and definitely not a penalty for me plus it seems that they should have been awarded one when Harriott handled the ball in the box (no video of that). So yeah I think I was pretty much spot on.![]()
![]()
![]()