I don't disagree with you there and I don't think they should have to come out and explain themselves.Maneki Neko wrote:other than endlessly epeating the same thing, im no sure what people want from thm.
they came in, said they wanted to develop the land, and would stabilise the club, but wouldnt be able to bank roll it indefinitely so were open to new investment, and if it wasnt forthcoming would probably have to sell up.
until somethiing in that statement changes, why would they keep repeating it?
The money that changes hands is completely opaque and comes in vast sums. How do you think you get scandals like third party ownership of players, payments to managers for signing certain players. Convicted fraudsters like Massimo Cellino own clubs.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:Is it though? Surely way too high profile amongst many other things.Ian Royal wrote:At the more cynical end, football is always good for money laundering.Nameless wrote:If the Thai's have extracted the assets then that must mean a potential,purchaser is buying us as a football club, not a non footballing investment opportunity.
If the Thai's are only selling a majority holding, not the whole club, they must see some value in remaining involved.
I'm sceptical about all club owners, but am interested in why people think several groups seem interested if as is being suggested the biggest asset is not actually owned by the club any more.
its exactly the same.CountryRoyal wrote:I don't disagree with you there and I don't think they should have to come out and explain themselves.Maneki Neko wrote:other than endlessly epeating the same thing, im no sure what people want from thm.
they came in, said they wanted to develop the land, and would stabilise the club, but wouldnt be able to bank roll it indefinitely so were open to new investment, and if it wasnt forthcoming would probably have to sell up.
until somethiing in that statement changes, why would they keep repeating it?
The only point I'm at odds with is saying a football club you've supported and been a fan of for x amount of years is just the same as any other business.
I think it's safe to say it isn't the same in the perception of most fans, but that doesn't mean the owners have to have the same view, or that in reality there is any difference.CountryRoyal wrote:I don't disagree with you there and I don't think they should have to come out and explain themselves.Maneki Neko wrote:other than endlessly epeating the same thing, im no sure what people want from thm.
they came in, said they wanted to develop the land, and would stabilise the club, but wouldnt be able to bank roll it indefinitely so were open to new investment, and if it wasnt forthcoming would probably have to sell up.
until somethiing in that statement changes, why would they keep repeating it?
The only point I'm at odds with is saying a football club you've supported and been a fan of for x amount of years is just the same as any other business.
Is he Chinese or Welsh?Mr Optimist wrote:She can get a cream for that, Canesten I think it's called.genome wrote:I'm surprised to see Lady Sasima jumping ship so quickly.
I thought unstoppably she burned within?
It would have been too obvious for her to write a song about her undying love of the gravel car park next to the stadium though.
Can I be the first to say Dai Yongge, Dai Yongge, can't you see the writing on the wall? (RIP Ronnie James Dio)
Half and half as we say here in Wales, half rice, half chips.Sutekh wrote:Is he Chinese or Welsh?Mr Optimist wrote:She can get a cream for that, Canesten I think it's called.genome wrote:I'm surprised to see Lady Sasima jumping ship so quickly.
I thought unstoppably she burned within?
It would have been too obvious for her to write a song about her undying love of the gravel car park next to the stadium though.
Can I be the first to say Dai Yongge, Dai Yongge, can't you see the writing on the wall? (RIP Ronnie James Dio)
This isn't the Brighton forum.BR2 wrote:I don't think you get what a fan is all about-we don't just "buy the product" in the way that you buy one brand one week and another the next.genome wrote:Why?
We don't own a stake in the club, all we do is buy their product
We are branded for life and often for most it is far from being the best buy.
I wish , in this country,we had a stake in our clubs as with Barcelona.
I gather that Mrs May's latest populist bandwagon is to push for more employees to be on the board of their employer so maybe she will advocate fans' board representation especially for her local League club.
SCIAG wrote:This isn't the Brighton forum.BR2 wrote:I don't think you get what a fan is all about-we don't just "buy the product" in the way that you buy one brand one week and another the next.genome wrote:Why?
We don't own a stake in the club, all we do is buy their product
We are branded for life and often for most it is far from being the best buy.
I wish , in this country,we had a stake in our clubs as with Barcelona.
I gather that Mrs May's latest populist bandwagon is to push for more employees to be on the board of their employer so maybe she will advocate fans' board representation especially for her local League club.
Have a read of Jimmy Burns'excellent book "Barca:-A People's Passion" and you will get a flavour of the massive connect between club, area and it's fans.Nameless wrote:Aren't Madrid and Barcelona ruled by dictatorial millionaires who spend huge sums getting 'elected' on the basis of promising the earth. Not sure how much the fans actually have to say in how the clubs are run. Isn't the key difference that what we call season tickets they call memberships, but they are essentially the same thing.BR2 wrote:I don't think you get what a fan is all about-we don't just "buy the product" in the way that you buy one brand one week and another the next.genome wrote:Why?
We don't own a stake in the club, all we do is buy their product
We are branded for life and often for most it is far from being the best buy.
I wish , in this country,we had a stake in our clubs as with Barcelona.
I gather that Mrs May's latest populist bandwagon is to push for more employees to be on the board of their employer so maybe she will advocate fans' board representation especially for her local League club.
The club and stadium being split? The Thai's own the land around the stadium and the hotel with RFC entitled to no share of any future sale or redevelopment. But the stadium as far as I'm aware remains in the hands of RFC, and STAR also had it protected as a community asset or whatever it's called.Fox Talbot wrote:Maybe the PL and FL have different standards over the 'fit and proper' persons test?
Very concerned that the club/ stadium is being split from the immediately adjacent land and re-development transport plans. Not a recipe for smooth running, I'd have thought.
And if the Thais are holding the land what is the Chinese's financial motivation for buying the club - same as the fella at Villa, Wolves etc - get in the Prem I suppose?
Sorry, not clear enough. Club+Stadium being split FROM surrounding land and hotel, not club being split from stadium.One8Seven1* wrote:The club and stadium being split? The Thai's own the land around the stadium and the hotel with RFC entitled to no share of any future sale or redevelopment. But the stadium as far as I'm aware remains in the hands of RFC, and STAR also had it protected as a community asset or whatever it's called.Fox Talbot wrote:Maybe the PL and FL have different standards over the 'fit and proper' persons test?
Very concerned that the club/ stadium is being split from the immediately adjacent land and re-development transport plans. Not a recipe for smooth running, I'd have thought.
And if the Thais are holding the land what is the Chinese's financial motivation for buying the club - same as the fella at Villa, Wolves etc - get in the Prem I suppose?
ChristGunny Fishcake wrote:To me OUR club feels like a prostitute being sold to the biggest pimp

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 243 guests