Clearly I have a problem with his work rate and that is part of the cause of the negative side of the stats, a lone centre forward has to work bloody hard and he can’t / won’t do that.Snowflake Royal wrote:Have some of the ball so we can give it to him.Royal Rother wrote:Joao’s stats as quoted on Sky are interesting if I heard correctly.
6 touches in the opponent’s box all season.
3 shots all season, all goals.
Can that be right?
And if it is, what can we do about it?
After Huddersfield, but that`s on telly too, can`t wait.Sutekh wrote:Normal service has been resumed at home. Next game is Norwich
By the end of a full season. Teams that concede the greatest number of goals end up in the bottom 3. Only league position that matters is after 46 games. No one remembers the what if moments.......JR wrote:
So let’s criticise a bad performance, but not lose perspective of a stunning start.
No - presume Longy was injured - but you surely get my drift?JR wrote:So Sir Steve would have put an injured player out on the pitch?!Rax wrote:One of the worst performances since Terry.
Fornah is a L2 player at best - a midfield performance Mark Reilly would have been proud of.
I'm bemused at best - v Stoke - 2 up front, dynamic team effort that deserved the win - tonight long balls to the lone Joao - I mean WTF.
Sir Steve would not have changed a winning team.
You see it as 4th.....I see it as 6 points off relegation.JR wrote:That was dreadful, but some of this overreaction is frankly laughable.
There are posters coming out of the woodwork on this page to chastise the team - where were you after Stoke, Blackburn etc?
Everything said by Ian Royal, Sutekh etc is correct - we were very very poor.
BUT that happens in the Championship and particularly with our patchwork squad should not be a surprise.
Just look at the table - after 20% of the season we are 4th! FOURTH - not even the most optimistic on here would have foresaw that.
So let’s criticise a bad performance, but not lose perspective of a stunning start.
Long is injured, but actually the whole never change a winning team approach is one of my biggest bugbears in the game.Rax wrote:No - presume Longy was injured - but you surely get my drift?JR wrote:So Sir Steve would have put an injured player out on the pitch?!Rax wrote:One of the worst performances since Terry.
Fornah is a L2 player at best - a midfield performance Mark Reilly would have been proud of.
I'm bemused at best - v Stoke - 2 up front, dynamic team effort that deserved the win - tonight long balls to the lone Joao - I mean WTF.
Sir Steve would not have changed a winning team.
Jesus Christ!!! One bad performance. Preceded by 4 home games we won that we deserved to win.Ascotexgunner wrote:You see it as 4th.....I see it as 6 points off relegation.JR wrote:That was dreadful, but some of this overreaction is frankly laughable.
There are posters coming out of the woodwork on this page to chastise the team - where were you after Stoke, Blackburn etc?
Everything said by Ian Royal, Sutekh etc is correct - we were very very poor.
BUT that happens in the Championship and particularly with our patchwork squad should not be a surprise.
Just look at the table - after 20% of the season we are 4th! FOURTH - not even the most optimistic on here would have foresaw that.
So let’s criticise a bad performance, but not lose perspective of a stunning start.
We were truly dire tonight. Any positivity I had that this team is mid table possibly has gone.
We will pretty much be fighting the other end like last season.
Really disappointed about tonight and the first two piss poor efforts up front that left us on the back foot to concede.
Fair point JR - I'm just frustrated that we looked decent with 2 up top and Ince then goes blindly into "sole Joao" mode.JR wrote:Long is injured, but actually the whole never change a winning team approach is one of my biggest bugbears in the game.Rax wrote:No - presume Longy was injured - but you surely get my drift?JR wrote:
So Sir Steve would have put an injured player out on the pitch?!
You pick a team to win the game in front of you, not the one behind.
Also there are always games you win that you didn’t deserve to, so to blindly pick the same side can be daft.
I hear you - Joao is one of the most frustrating strikers when he is not on it. It’s not like Long (or Doyle) who good day or bad day would put 106% inRax wrote:Fair point JR - I'm just frustrated that we looked decent with 2 up top and Ince then goes blindly into "sole Joao" mode.JR wrote:Long is injured, but actually the whole never change a winning team approach is one of my biggest bugbears in the game.Rax wrote:
No - presume Longy was injured - but you surely get my drift?
You pick a team to win the game in front of you, not the one behind.
Also there are always games you win that you didn’t deserve to, so to blindly pick the same side can be daft.
Long balls into him against a bruising CB is never gonna work - and it didn't!
Very good summary.JR wrote:Paul Ince reaction - great to see to be honest:
First and foremost, credit to Sunderland. They played some good stuff and they looked a very good side. But we let them look like a very good side," Ince began.
"We had no intensity, no second balls won, in possession we were sloppy, we couldn’t hold the ball up, we looked tired – and we shouldn’t be saying that after we had the weekend off.
"We looked nervous. They looked sharper, hungrier, we didn’t look our normal selves – we were completely the opposite to what we’ve done in the first four home games.
"They wanted it more than us, we weren’t aggressive enough, we weren’t competitive enough. We didn’t do anything right.
"We were miles off it. There is not one player who did themselves credit tonight. And if we’re not on it, we’re going to get beaten. Because we are where we are and because we’ve had a good start, everyone was getting a bit above our station.
"This result is a wake-up call. It’s a kick up the backside we needed. Our job is to stay in this league. And this is where we are.
"Maybe the players got carried away too. We’re not good enough not to be on it. This result puts everyone’s feet back on the ground.
"We have to compete in every game. We have to fight for everything, we have to fight to win. And we’ve got to do that in every single game until we get to March and then we’ll see where we are in the table.
"We have got to do the basics right, that's what kept us up last year and that is what has given us a good start this season. But we didn’t do that tonight. We didn’t turn up.
"It’s 12 points from five home games and we have to be positive about that. But if we go into games with that same attitude and application, we’ll lose. So I hope to see a response on Saturday."
I don’t agree about Sunderland. They were excellent. Zipped the ball about really well and always had a midfielder in space. They closed us down superbly. Their third goal was outstanding.Royalcop wrote:I also left with 20 mins to go; entirely obvious we were never getting back into that game once their third went in. Genuinely baffled by where that performance came from - the polar opposite of the performance v Stoke. No passion, commitment or understanding between the players. Sunderland weren’t even any good, we gifted them those three points.
It wasn’t bad. It was unacceptable. However Ince has said what needed to be said. On balance we have done very well to have 15 points. There dies need to be a reaction on Saturday.JR wrote:Jesus Christ!!! One bad performance. Preceded by 4 home games we won that we deserved to win.Ascotexgunner wrote:You see it as 4th.....I see it as 6 points off relegation.JR wrote:That was dreadful, but some of this overreaction is frankly laughable.
There are posters coming out of the woodwork on this page to chastise the team - where were you after Stoke, Blackburn etc?
Everything said by Ian Royal, Sutekh etc is correct - we were very very poor.
BUT that happens in the Championship and particularly with our patchwork squad should not be a surprise.
Just look at the table - after 20% of the season we are 4th! FOURTH - not even the most optimistic on here would have foresaw that.
So let’s criticise a bad performance, but not lose perspective of a stunning start.
We were truly dire tonight. Any positivity I had that this team is mid table possibly has gone.
We will pretty much be fighting the other end like last season.
Really disappointed about tonight and the first two piss poor efforts up front that left us on the back foot to concede.
Get a grip.
‘Greed - Roberts and to a lesser extent Clarke ran us ragged all night and I thought Alese had a very good game for themZip wrote:I don’t agree about Sunderland. They were excellent. Zipped the ball about really well and always had a midfielder in space. They closed us down superbly. Their third goal was outstanding.Royalcop wrote:I also left with 20 mins to go; entirely obvious we were never getting back into that game once their third went in. Genuinely baffled by where that performance came from - the polar opposite of the performance v Stoke. No passion, commitment or understanding between the players. Sunderland weren’t even any good, we gifted them those three points.
Worst performance I have ever seen from a Reading team. We looked like a non League team. I have no issues with us losing if we give it a go but losing like that tonight was simply unacceptable.
I thought our biggest problem was in midfield. Hendrick simply isn’t very good and Loum was a huge disappointment. Would like Ejaria in for Hendrick after the international break. I think he is by some distance our weakest link.URZZZZ wrote:‘Greed - Roberts and to a lesser extent Clarke ran us ragged all night and I thought Alese had a very good game for themZip wrote:I don’t agree about Sunderland. They were excellent. Zipped the ball about really well and always had a midfielder in space. They closed us down superbly. Their third goal was outstanding.Royalcop wrote:I also left with 20 mins to go; entirely obvious we were never getting back into that game once their third went in. Genuinely baffled by where that performance came from - the polar opposite of the performance v Stoke. No passion, commitment or understanding between the players. Sunderland weren’t even any good, we gifted them those three points.
Worst performance I have ever seen from a Reading team. We looked like a non League team. I have no issues with us losing if we give it a go but losing like that tonight was simply unacceptable.
Roberts and Clarke showing the merits of taking on a man and creating danger through pace. For the thousandth time, Yiadom is not a wing back and Rahman offers nothing in this system, a waste of time. How were we meant to get back in the game with those two as our outball? Dreadful management
My girlfriend, who knows next to nothing about football, commented that it looked like "the team in red have an extra player".leon wrote: ffs Ince learn to change it when it’s not working. Tonight that was at about 10 mins in.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bazzaballs, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Houlton11, Marcel, RG30, WestYorksRoyal and 141 guests