Yeah was annoying that. Tbf had given up hope of snatching anything by thenwindermereROYAL wrote:It took the keeper a full minute take a fk and gk and the ref added 10 seconds
It’s a graveyard of a place in the league. Different proposition in the cup where Reading have drawn 1 and won 2 of the last 3 visits.Ascotexgunner wrote:Few years back we have had some good wins up there.Royal_jimmy wrote:Would love to nick something here but don't see it. This is a haunted hunting ground for us
Yeah I agree, I think we are seeing a more consistent side now anyway that has improved. I thought about it earlier today, we've suffered some stuffing's like at Rotherham and I'd question whether that would happen now, even the defeat at Blackpool (I know we didn't have our squad finalised by then). I know that can sound like "when you play teams", but I do think we look a lot more stable now.Elm Park Kid wrote:I reckon we're seeing some gradual improvement. In matches before the WC we either overwhelmed weak opponents or got battered by the stronger ones. Now we're becoming much more difficult to beat, not just by parking the bus but by defending well as a team (most of the time). For some reason our forward play has gotten worse, but I'm hoping that will start clicking as we grow in confidence.
Agree with that - though nearly all their chances came earlyZip wrote:Thought Lumley,Yids and Loum did well.
TInce not on his game at all.
If Baba takes his chance we pick up a great point although in fairness they had 6 or 7 very good chances.
Imagine a keeper and ref doing that and supporters getting wound up by it!Hound wrote:Yeah was annoying that. Tbf had given up hope of snatching anything by thenwindermereROYAL wrote:It took the keeper a full minute take a fk and gk and the ref added 10 seconds
by South Coast Royal » 02 Jan 2023 17:29
02 Jan 2023 17:29I keep on reading about next Summer and have been feeling the same way as you so I do hope that we won't be disappointed to find that the anticipated arrivals don't arrive.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Yeah I agree, I think we are seeing a more consistent side now anyway that has improved. I thought about it earlier today, we've suffered some stuffing's like at Rotherham and I'd question whether that would happen now, even the defeat at Blackpool (I know we didn't have our squad finalised by then). I know that can sound like "when you play teams", but I do think we look a lot more stable now.Elm Park Kid wrote:I reckon we're seeing some gradual improvement. In matches before the WC we either overwhelmed weak opponents or got battered by the stronger ones. Now we're becoming much more difficult to beat, not just by parking the bus but by defending well as a team (most of the time). For some reason our forward play has gotten worse, but I'm hoping that will start clicking as we grow in confidence.
Hopefully come the summer when we can bring some players in properly, we can try and add a bit more creativity and we can become a bit more of a threat going forward, that's the next step for us.
There’s a 3 page chat about in in one the threads…but yeah part of the game. Great when Lumley does it, infuriating when the oppo doesRoyalBlue wrote:Imagine a keeper and ref doing that and supporters getting wound up by it!Hound wrote:Yeah was annoying that. Tbf had given up hope of snatching anything by thenwindermereROYAL wrote:It took the keeper a full minute take a fk and gk and the ref added 10 seconds
I don't think it will be a quick fix, so I wouldn't anticipate having 3/4 creative players coming in and revitalising what we do, but just something we can build on each season. I've just watched the first half of the Brentford Liverpool game and I see similarities between our styles and Brentford's. Obviously Brentford have the better quality but sit deep, soak up pressure and launch counter attacks. They've got pace up front which we generally lack and when they have the ball they look to get it wide and get crosses into the box with powerful players. I could just see us going down a similar sort of route to that really.South Coast Royal wrote:I keep on reading about next Summer and have been feeling the same way as you so I do hope that we won't be disappointed to find that the anticipated arrivals don't arrive.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Yeah I agree, I think we are seeing a more consistent side now anyway that has improved. I thought about it earlier today, we've suffered some stuffing's like at Rotherham and I'd question whether that would happen now, even the defeat at Blackpool (I know we didn't have our squad finalised by then). I know that can sound like "when you play teams", but I do think we look a lot more stable now.Elm Park Kid wrote:I reckon we're seeing some gradual improvement. In matches before the WC we either overwhelmed weak opponents or got battered by the stronger ones. Now we're becoming much more difficult to beat, not just by parking the bus but by defending well as a team (most of the time). For some reason our forward play has gotten worse, but I'm hoping that will start clicking as we grow in confidence.
Hopefully come the summer when we can bring some players in properly, we can try and add a bit more creativity and we can become a bit more of a threat going forward, that's the next step for us.
The easy part is putting 10 men behind the ball; the hardest part is creating chances and scoring goals.
so, for now we have to content ourselves with the former but, as others have posted previously, we are a hard watch.
Or we could have viewed this game as a free hit and tried to limit WBA more, in which case we did pretty wellblythspartan wrote:A battling 1-0 defeat and to think we could have snatched a late equaliser. Loum and Lumley were both very good today.
My only negative is that we could have viewed this game as a free hit and tried to attack WBA more. We’d have probably got a pasting tbf, but nonetheless I would have liked to have seen a more attacking performance.
We look a solid Championship outfit now. Lacking flair but awkward to beat. We are no longer a soft touch.Elm Park Kid wrote:I reckon we're seeing some gradual improvement. In matches before the WC we either overwhelmed weak opponents or got battered by the stronger ones. Now we're becoming much more difficult to beat, not just by parking the bus but by defending well as a team (most of the time). For some reason our forward play has gotten worse, but I'm hoping that will start clicking as we grow in confidence.
GoodSnowflake Royal wrote:Completely forgot about this game.
WBA weren’t anything special. They had a lot of the ball but didn’t really look like scoring before the goal, and after the goal despite shots not on target. I’m actually disappointed we didn’t get at least a point from this.Uke wrote:Or we could have viewed this game as a free hit and tried to limit WBA more, in which case we did pretty wellblythspartan wrote:A battling 1-0 defeat and to think we could have snatched a late equaliser. Loum and Lumley were both very good today.
My only negative is that we could have viewed this game as a free hit and tried to attack WBA more. We’d have probably got a pasting tbf, but nonetheless I would have liked to have seen a more attacking performance.
They should have had about 3 in the first 10 minutes, outside of that though, maybe not so much.leon wrote:WBA weren’t anything special. They had a lot of the ball but didn’t really look like scoring before the goal, and after the goal despite shots not on target. I’m actually disappointed we didn’t get at least a point from this.Uke wrote:Or we could have viewed this game as a free hit and tried to limit WBA more, in which case we did pretty wellblythspartan wrote:A battling 1-0 defeat and to think we could have snatched a late equaliser. Loum and Lumley were both very good today.
My only negative is that we could have viewed this game as a free hit and tried to attack WBA more. We’d have probably got a pasting tbf, but nonetheless I would have liked to have seen a more attacking performance.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bazzaballs, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], RG30, WestYorksRoyal and 156 guests