by Snowflake Royal » 14 Jan 2024 10:36
14 Jan 2024 10:36by RG30 » 14 Jan 2024 10:40
14 Jan 2024 10:40by NathStPaul » 14 Jan 2024 10:42
14 Jan 2024 10:42Do you mean wrong time in the Port Vale game or wrong time to do a pitch invasion in general? When is the right time?Snowflake Royal wrote:I think it's a case that most people who argue against the action still respectvthe feelung behind it and support the right to do it.
And you can argue whether it's constructive or the best action as much as you like before it happens to try to influence against it, but once it's happened that's done and its time to send a united front.
I was against tennis ball disruptions during the game, I'd prefer a different protest or timing that doesn't interrupt play. But it did it's job and was mostly well handled, which is worth applauding those who did it.
Same for the pitch invasion. I think it's more harmful than helpful, and now was the wrong time. I didn’t think it should happen. But it has, so now we get behind it.
by Ten Bobsworth » 14 Jan 2024 10:44
14 Jan 2024 10:44Get behind it with another futile gesture. That'll show 'em what you're made of.Snowflake Royal wrote:I think it's a case that most people who argue against the action still respectvthe feelung behind it and support the right to do it.
And you can argue whether it's constructive or the best action as much as you like before it happens to try to influence against it, but once it's happened that's done and its time to send a united front.
I was against tennis ball disruptions during the game, I'd prefer a different protest or timing that doesn't interrupt play. But it did it's job and was mostly well handled, which is worth applauding those who did it.
Same for the pitch invasion. I think it's more harmful than helpful, and now was the wrong time. I didn’t think it should happen. But it has, so now we get behind it.
by 72 bus » 14 Jan 2024 10:49
14 Jan 2024 10:49He wasn't even at the game.Snowflake Royal wrote:Were you on the pitch Jimmy?Royal_jimmy wrote:It's about god damn time we had a pitch invasion
by Tom Clancey the II » 14 Jan 2024 10:52
14 Jan 2024 10:52by jd82 » 14 Jan 2024 11:02
14 Jan 2024 11:02leon wrote:What? There was almost a fight in our section yesterday. Kicking off all over the place. You'd have loved it. Being the hard man that you are.Snowflake Royal wrote:Been in every part of the ground, if I want to attend, I'll go with the good, honest, positive and engaged folk of C1871, rather than the stuck up, passive, unengaged dull lot in UWleon wrote:
If you're suffering fomo, you can always upgrade your radio.
by Clyde1998 » 14 Jan 2024 11:03
14 Jan 2024 11:03I think the mainstream media reaction of 'it's only Reading, who gives a toss?' is down to the mainstream media's default position being 'it's not the Premier League, who gives a toss?'.Tom Clancey the II wrote:Genuinely conflicted about yesterday.
Was at the game, I am told that Sky Sports ignored what was going on. Bit of coverage in the papers today but mainstream reaction seems to be; 'Its only Reading who gives a toss'.
Downside will be match given to Vale, further points deduction and games being played behind closed doors. So has the protest shot itself in both feet?
EFL have a lot to answer for in terms of approving the current owner despite the obvious Red Flags at the time, but they are going to wash their hands and carry on kicking us in the cojones, as we are an easy target.
Kudos to the guy who got the wooden placard in the ground, couldn't see what it said, was it advertising new Kitchens?
by Mr Sitter » 14 Jan 2024 11:14
14 Jan 2024 11:14by Garry Baldy » 14 Jan 2024 11:20
14 Jan 2024 11:20by leon » 14 Jan 2024 11:26
14 Jan 2024 11:26Yeah it was! Bloke in a leather jacket. Where were you?jd82 wrote:leon wrote:What? There was almost a fight in our section yesterday. Kicking off all over the place. You'd have loved it. Being the hard man that you are.Snowflake Royal wrote: Been in every part of the ground, if I want to attend, I'll go with the good, honest, positive and engaged folk of C1871, rather than the stuck up, passive, unengaged dull lot in UW![]()
Was that the guy arguing with people in the ‘club’ section in the middle. Never seen the UW get so feisty.
by Snowflake Royal » 14 Jan 2024 11:27
14 Jan 2024 11:27Invasion and abandonment comes with the risk of points deductions, fines and matches behind closed doors. All things that currently hurt the club badly.NathStPaul wrote:Do you mean wrong time in the Port Vale game or wrong time to do a pitch invasion in general? When is the right time?Snowflake Royal wrote:I think it's a case that most people who argue against the action still respectvthe feelung behind it and support the right to do it.
And you can argue whether it's constructive or the best action as much as you like before it happens to try to influence against it, but once it's happened that's done and its time to send a united front.
I was against tennis ball disruptions during the game, I'd prefer a different protest or timing that doesn't interrupt play. But it did it's job and was mostly well handled, which is worth applauding those who did it.
Same for the pitch invasion. I think it's more harmful than helpful, and now was the wrong time. I didn’t think it should happen. But it has, so now we get behind it.
by Lower West » 14 Jan 2024 11:32
14 Jan 2024 11:32Seems to have been forgotten why pitch invasions were made illegal. Not always peacefull. With match officials, players and other supporters at risk of harm. There's plentry of mindless morons in this world unfortunately who attach themselves to football clubs and call themselves supporters.Mr Sitter wrote:
I still think any punishment which affects the club financially could be very damaging and the long term benefits of the abandonment to the cause remain to be seen but at least those fans yesterday did something and I’m feeling more comfortable with it now it’s happened.
by jd82 » 14 Jan 2024 11:57
14 Jan 2024 11:57A couple of rows back from him, just the other side of the barrier.leon wrote:Yeah it was! Bloke in a leather jacket. Where were you?jd82 wrote:leon wrote:
What? There was almost a fight in our section yesterday. Kicking off all over the place. You'd have loved it. Being the hard man that you are.![]()
Was that the guy arguing with people in the ‘club’ section in the middle. Never seen the UW get so feisty.
(wasn't you was it? I did suggest he/you stop being "such a cnut you fcuking twat)
by St Pauli » 14 Jan 2024 11:59
14 Jan 2024 11:59The people are becoming more radicalised!Clyde1998 wrote:I wonder what it would've been prior to this week's events. We've gone from the tennis balls being supported by a sizeable minority to getting games abandoned being in the majority very quickly.Brogue wrote:So far it seems most fans were in favourWestYorksRoyal wrote:This poll is going to end 52-48 isn't it?
by Royal_jimmy » 14 Jan 2024 12:00
14 Jan 2024 12:00YupSnowflake Royal wrote:Were you on the pitch Jimmy?Royal_jimmy wrote:It's about god damn time we had a pitch invasion
by Snowflake Royal » 14 Jan 2024 12:01
14 Jan 2024 12:01A little part of me would very much like a little bit of mob justice for Mr Dai Yongge, no matter how much it goes against what I think of as right and acceptable.St Pauli wrote:The people are becoming more radicalised!Clyde1998 wrote:I wonder what it would've been prior to this week's events. We've gone from the tennis balls being supported by a sizeable minority to getting games abandoned being in the majority very quickly.Brogue wrote:
So far it seems most fans were in favour
It won’t be long until we have a sizeable majority supporting an armed terror campaign against Dai and the EFL.
I’m happy to stockpile weapons and rockets in my school for SBWD. Just hit me up over PM.
by Royal_jimmy » 14 Jan 2024 12:03
14 Jan 2024 12:03Good lad and good on the ones who didn't leave. I never want a match abandoned but it was a way of sticking 2 fingers up to the EFL and get media attention. Don't think it'll have a big impact on Dai.RG30 wrote:I was on the pitch and I couldn’t have been any happier I got on as enough is enough.
I’ve not thrown a tennis ball or gone on the match pre Pompey but last week’s news was the final act in what has been a disasterous ownership by the Yongge family and like others I fear the end is near.
It was good to see a few current/ex nobbers on as well.
by St Pauli » 14 Jan 2024 12:06
14 Jan 2024 12:06You cannot sit on the sidelines Ian. You are either with us or against us.Snowflake Royal wrote:A little part of me would very much like a little bit of mob justice for Mr Dai Yongge, no matter how much it goes against what I think of as right and acceptable.St Pauli wrote:The people are becoming more radicalised!Clyde1998 wrote: I wonder what it would've been prior to this week's events. We've gone from the tennis balls being supported by a sizeable minority to getting games abandoned being in the majority very quickly.
It won’t be long until we have a sizeable majority supporting an armed terror campaign against Dai and the EFL.
I’m happy to stockpile weapons and rockets in my school for SBWD. Just hit me up over PM.
by paddy20 » 14 Jan 2024 12:09
14 Jan 2024 12:09Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 393 guests